期刊文献+

土壤饱和导水率空间预测的不确定性分析 被引量:17

Uncertainty analysis for spatial prediction of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当土壤转换函数应用于土壤水力性质估计时,对于预测值的不确定性往往容易被忽视。为了有针对性地提出减少这种不确定性的方法和措施,提高土壤转换函数的实际应用能力,以两种现有的土壤转换函数(Vereecken和HYPRES模型)为例,将其应用于山东省平度市土壤饱和导水率的空间预测,并利用拉丁超立方抽样(LHS)方法对预测结果的不确定性进行了分析。结果表明,饱和导水率空间预测的不确定性主要来源于土壤基本性质的空间插值误差和土壤转换函数自身的预测误差。当Vereecken模型应用于饱和导水率空间预测时,预测结果的不确定性主要由土壤基本性质空间插值误差所决定,土壤转换函数预测误差的影响较小,而HYPRES模型则是受二者的双重影响。 Pedotransfer functions are commonly used to predict soil hydraulic characteristics.However,the analysis of prediction uncertainty is often ignored by researchers.In an attempt to reduce the prediction uncertainty and to improve the applicability of pedotransfer functions,two existing pedotransfer functions are used to predict the spatial distribution of soil saturated hydraulic conductivity in the Pingdu city of Shandong Province.The two functions are the Vereecken's pedotransfer function and the database of HYdraulic PRoperties of European Soils(HYPRES).The Latin hypercube sampling method is applied to estimate the uncertainty in predicting soil saturated hydraulic conductivity.Results show that there are two major sources of uncertainty,which are:(1) the uncertainty in the spatial interpolation of basic soil properties using Kriging;and(2) the uncertainty associated with the use of pedotransfer functions to predict soil saturated hydraulic functions.The Kriging error is the major source of uncertainty in predicting soil saturated hydraulic conductivity using the Vereecken's pedotransfer function.While,the prediction results are affected by both HYPRES and Kriging.
出处 《水科学进展》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期200-205,共6页 Advances in Water Science
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(40725010 41030746)~~
关键词 土壤转换函数 饱和导水率 不确定性 KRIGING插值 拉丁超立方抽样 pedotransfer functions saturated hydraulic conductivity uncertainty Kriging interpolation Latin hypercube sampling
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1徐绍辉,刘建立.土壤水力性质确定方法研究进展[J].水科学进展,2003,14(4):494-501. 被引量:53
  • 2刘继龙,马孝义,张振华.土壤入渗特性的空间变异性及土壤转换函数[J].水科学进展,2010,21(2):214-221. 被引量:34
  • 3陈效民,Bouma,J.应用一次出流法结合SFIT模型对土壤水力性质的研究[J].土壤学报,1994,31(2):214-219. 被引量:37
  • 4CHIRICO G B, MEDINA H, ROMANO N. Uncertainty in predicting soil hydraulic properties at the hillslope scale with indirect methods [ J]. Journal of Hydrology, 2007, 334 : 405-422.
  • 5DENG H L, YE M, SCHAAP M G, et al. Quantification of uncertainty in pedotransfer function-based parameter estimation for unsaturated flow modeling[ J]. Water Resources Research, 2009, 45: W04409. [ doi: 10. 1029/2008WR007477 ].
  • 6JOURNEL A G, HUIJBREGTS CH J. Mining geostatisties[ M]. London: Academic Press, 1978: 303-343.
  • 7KITANIDIS P K. Introduction to geostatistics: Applications in hydrogeology[ M ]. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1997 : 86 -95.
  • 8CRESSIE N. Statistics of spatial data[M]. New York: John Wiley, 1991: 386-389.
  • 9DEUTSCH C V, JOURNEL A G. GSLIB-geostatistical software library and user's guide[ M]. Oxford:Oxford University Press, 1998: 207 -209.
  • 10MCKAY M D, CONOVER W J, BECKMAN R J. A comparison of three methods for selecting values of input variables in the analysis of output from a computer code[ J ]. Technometrics, 1979, 21:239-245.

二级参考文献108

共引文献137

同被引文献214

引证文献17

二级引证文献82

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部