期刊文献+

《说文》籀文讹形例释

A Study on the Erroneous Changes among Zhou-wen(籀文) as Seen in Shuo-wen Jie-zi(说文解字)
下载PDF
导出
摘要 籀文出自《史籀篇》。《史籀篇》早佚,迄今能确证为籀文者,仅《说文》所录籀文225字。然《史籀篇》由西周传写至汉,字形或已非原貌,加以《说文》流传已久,籀文在其中传钞和刊刻的过程中产生讹误,亦不足为奇。文章结合出土古文字材料,为《说文》籀文中部分舛误的形体作了考订。籀文中的讹形,有部分源于笔误,也有部分是受晚周文字写法影响致讹的。 Zhou-wen (籀文) is generally considered as the form of written characters of Shi-Zhou-pian (说文解字). However, Shi-Zhou-pian was lost in early period, only 225 characters of Zhou-wen were preserved by Xu Shen's Shuo-wen Jie-zi (说文解字). As Shuo-wen Jie-zi was written in the Eastern Han Dynast, there would be erroneous changes on the characters during circulation in the past 2000 years. This paper is a comparative study on Zhou-wen and different ancient Chinese characters, aiming at identifying the erroneous characters among Zhou-wen. The finding of this paper is that, to certain extent, there are erroneous changes on some characters of Zhou-wen. These changes were caused by mistakes of the copier, and also the influence of the script of the late Zhou period.
作者 李咏健
出处 《南阳师范学院学报》 CAS 2012年第2期35-39,共5页 Journal of Nanyang Normal University
关键词 籀文 《史籀篇》 《说文》 讹变 Zhou-wen (籀文) Shi-Zhou-pian (史籀篇) Shuo-wen(说文解字) erroneous changes
  • 相关文献

参考文献24

  • 1潘玉坤.籀文字数考索[J].古籍研究,2002(2):79-81. 被引量:1
  • 2香港中文大学中国文化研究所开发“汉达文库”,香港:香港中文大学中国文化研究所,1998.
  • 3《史籀篇疏证》,《海宁王静安先生遗书》,台北:台湾商务印书馆,1979,第5册,页2071、2121、2133、2136.
  • 4许慎撰,段玉裁注.《说文解字注》,上海:上海古籍出版社,2006,第2版,页314—315.
  • 5《古文字构形学》,福州:福建人民出版社,2006年,第274页.
  • 6孙诒让.孙籀庼先生集(第1册)[M].台北:艺文印书馆,1963.
  • 7叶德辉.说文籀文考证[M].台北:新文丰出版公司,1989.
  • 8王国维.史籀篇疏证[A].海宁王静安先生遗书(第5册)[C].台北:台湾商务印书馆,1979:2067-2142.
  • 9许锬辉.说文重文形体考[M].台北:文津出版社,1973.
  • 10许慎撰.徐铉校定.说文解字[M].北京:中华书局,2003.

二级参考文献2

共引文献33

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部