期刊文献+

砂岩基质酸化中酸岩反应数学模型 被引量:6

Acid/sandstone reaction modeling for sandstone-matrix acidizing
原文传递
导出
摘要 建立了砂岩基质酸化时酸液沿井筒径向流动以及关井反应的数学模型,考虑温度对反应速度的影响,进行了数值求解,研究了酸岩反应规律,可以对酸化效果进行预测.计算结果表明:沿井筒径向HF酸浓度下降很快,其作用范围只有0.4m左右;次生H2SiF6与HF的溶解能力相当,并且是HF的有益补充,0.4~0.9m范围内快速反应矿物的消耗主要是由H2SiF6溶解,增加了土酸的穿透深度;硅胶Si(OH)4沉淀随着反应时间的增长而逐渐增加,酸化结束后一定时间内残酸必须彻底返排,否则容易形成2次沉淀,影响酸化效果;地层温度越高HF酸消耗越快,有效作用距离越短,生成的硅胶Si(OH)4浓度越大;提高注酸速度有利于提高酸化穿透距离,解除地层深部伤害. Mathematical models for acid injection and shut-in reaction periods were established during acidization of sandstone-matrix by considering the effect of temperature on reaction rate. The models were solved by numerical method, and the reaction between acid and sandstone was studied. The results can predict the effect of the acid/sandstone reaction. The calculation re- sults show that the concentration of HF decreased quickly during the acidization of sandstone- matrix in radical direction with HF operating range of less than 0.4 m. The dissolving capacity of the secondary H2 SiF6 was equal to HF, which is a beneficial complement for HF. Rapid re- action mineral in the range of 0.4 to 0.9 m is mainly dissolved by Hz SiF6. It increases acidizing penetration depth. The deposition of Si(OH)4 increases with time, but a flowback of the reac- ted acid is needed after the reaction for some time, otherwise secondary precipitation will oc- cur, which affects the acidization of sandstone-matrix. The rate of HF consumption increases with the formation temperature, which reduces the operating range of HF. The concentration
出处 《中国矿业大学学报》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第2期236-241,共6页 Journal of China University of Mining & Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(50876115) 山东省自然科学基金项目(Y2007F14)
关键词 砂岩 基质酸化 酸岩反应 数学模型 模拟 sandstone matrix acidizing acid/sandstone reaction mathematical model simula-tion
  • 相关文献

参考文献14

  • 1AHMED I R,AHMED M G,HISHAM A N.HCl-formic in-situ gelled acid for carbonate acidizing:coreflood and reaction rate study[C]//2011Society ofPetroleum Engineers.SPE Production and Opera-tions Symposium.Oklahoma:Society of PetroleumEngineers,2011:1-20.
  • 2YUSUF H,FOGLER H S,MCCUNE C C.The ra-dial movement of permeability fronts and multiple re-action zones in porous media[J].SPE Journal.1982,22(1):99-107.
  • 3GDANSKI R D.Experience and research show bestdesigns for foam-diverted acidizing[J].Oil&GasJournal,1993:85-89.
  • 4ZHOU Z H,ROSSEN W R.Applying fractionalflow theory to foams for diversion in matrix acidiza-tion[J].SPE Production&Facilities,1994,9(1):29-35.
  • 5TAHA R,HILL A D,SEPEHRNOORI K.Simula-tion of sandstone-matrix acidizing in heterogeneousreservoirs[J].Journal of Petroleum Technology,1986,38(7):753-767.
  • 6BRYANT S L.A improved model of mud acid/sand-stone chemistry[C]//1991Society of Petroleum En-gineers.SPE Annual Technical Conference and Exhi-bition.Dallas:Society of Petroleum Engineers,1991:1-25.
  • 7THOMAS R L,ALI S A,ROBERT J A.Field vali-dation of a foam diversion model:a matrix stimula-tion case study[C]//1998Society of Petroleum Engi-neers.SPE Formation Damage Control Conference.Lafayette:Society of Petroleum Engineers,1998:1-16.
  • 8GUICHARD III J A,ALLIISON D,GDANSKI RD,et al.An overview of HF acid as applied to thewilcox sand in Reddell field,southwest Louisiana[C]//1996 Society of Petroleum Engineers.SPEFormation Damage Control Symposium.Lafayette:Society of Petroleum Engineers,1996:1-5.
  • 9GDANSKI R R.Kinetics of the secondary reaction ofHF on alumino-silicates[C]//1997Society of Petro-leum Engineers.International Symposium on OilfieldChemistry.Houston:Society of Petroleum Engi-neers,1997:1-13.
  • 10NASR-EL-DIN H A,HOPKINS J A,SHUCHA-RT C E,et al.Aluminum scaling and formationdamage due to regular mud acid treatment[C]//1998Society of Petroleum Engineers.SPE Forma-tion Damage Control Conference.Lafayette:Societyof Petroleum Engineers,1998:1-9.

同被引文献52

  • 1俞英珍,金鲜花,傅佳亚.钙离子螯合力测试方法及比较[J].印染助剂,2006,23(12):40-42. 被引量:22
  • 2李海涛,王永清,谭灿.砂岩储层清水和污水混注对储层损害的实验评价[J].石油学报,2007,28(2):137-139. 被引量:21
  • 3陈钢,魏建军,王树军,刘建伟,焦力强.砂岩油藏注水井深部酸化技术[J].石油钻采工艺,2007,29(3):45-48. 被引量:4
  • 4PANGA M K R, ZIAUDDIN M, BALAKOTAIAH V.Two-scale continuum model for simulation of wormholesin carbonate acidization[J]. American Institute ofChemical Engineers, 2005, 51(12): 3231-3248.
  • 5FREDD C N, MILLER M J. Validation of carbonatematrix stimulation models[R]. SPE 58713, 2000.
  • 6KALIA N, BALAKOTAIAH V. Modeling and analysis ofwormhole formation in reactive dissolution of carbonaterocks[J]. Chemical Engineering Science, 2007, 62(4):919-928.
  • 7LI C. Fine scale sandstone acidizing core flood simulation[D]. Austin: University of Texas, 2004.
  • 8THOMAS R L, NASR-EL-DIN H A, LYNN J D, et al.Channel vs. matrix sandstone acidizing of a HT/HPreservoir in Saudi Arabia[C]//International Symposiumand Exhibition on Formation Damage Control, 2002.
  • 9WEHUNT C D, Van ARSDALE H, WARNER J L, et al.Laboratory acidization of an eolian sandstone at 380F[R].SPE 25211, 1993.
  • 10KALFAYAN L J, METCALF A S. Successful sandstoneacid design case histories: Exceptions to conventionalwisdom[R]. SPE 63178, 2000.

引证文献6

二级引证文献27

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部