期刊文献+

高阶英语学习者N+N组合概念认知机制研究 被引量:6

A study of cognitive mechanism employed in understanding English N+N combined concepts by advanced Chinese learners of English
原文传递
导出
摘要 本实验考察我国高阶英语学习者理解英语N+N组合概念时,对两个主要组合概念认知机制的调用情况。结果显示:此群体偏向于否定"结构对位"机制建立的"属性映射"N+N概念意义的合理性;主要调用"场景构建"认知机制对N+N概念进行"关系连接"释义。这种偏向性一方面表明"属性映射"N+N概念是英语学习者的认知难点,母语认知机制在英语组合概念理解中有负迁移作用,另一方面提示英语教学不仅要重视英语技能培养,也要加强英语文化体验。 This empirical research attempts to examine how the advanced Chinese learners of English use the two major cognitive mechanisms in understanding English N+N combined concepts.The results manifest that the subjects have a strong tendency to reject the meaningfulness of property mapping N+N concepts built by structural alignment mechanism and they prefer to turn to the scenario creation mechanism for an explanation of English N+N concepts in terms of relation linking.This propensity suggests that N+N concepts in need of property mapping explanation are still a difficult cognitive area for the advanced Chinese learners of English and that the transferred mother tongue cognitive mechanism functions in a negative way in their understanding of English N+N combined concepts.
出处 《外语教学理论与实践》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期21-26,共6页 Foreign Language Learning Theory And Practice
基金 新世纪广西高等教育教学改革工程项目(桂教高教[2008]151号)成果之一 项目负责人:张少林
关键词 英语N+N概念 认知机制 高阶英语学习者 English N+N concept cognitive mechanisms advanced Chinese learners of English
  • 相关文献

参考文献21

  • 1Connell,L.,&Lynott,D.2011.“Interpretation and representation:Testing the embodied conceptual combination(ECCo) theory”.In B.Kokinov,A.Karmiloff-Smith,&N.J.Nersessian(Eds.),Proceedings of the Third European Conference on Cognitive Science.Sofia,Bulgaria:New Bulgarian University Press.
  • 2Costello F.J.&M.T.Keane.1997.“Polysemy in conceptual combination:Testing the constraint theory of combination”.Hillsdale,NJ:Nineteenth Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society.
  • 3Downing,P.1977.“On the creation and use of English compound nouns”.Language 53.pp810-842.
  • 4GagnéC.L.2000.“Relation-based combinations versus property-based combinations:A test of the CARIN theory and the dual process theory of conceptual combination”.Journal of Memory and Language42.pp365-389.
  • 5GagnéC.L.2002.“The competition-among-relations in-nominals theory of conceptual combination:Implications for stimulus class formation and class expansion”.Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior78.pp551-565.
  • 6Gagne,C.L.&E.J.Shoben.1997.“The influence of thematic relations on the comprehension of non-predicating conceptual combinations”.Journal of Experimental Psychology:Learning,Memory,and Cognition 23.pp71-87.
  • 7Jackendoff,R.S.1985.Semantics and Cognition.Cambridge,MA:MIT Press.
  • 8Markman A.B.&Wisniewski E.J.1997.“Similar and different:The differentiation of basic level categories”.Learning,Memory&Cognition23.pp57-70.
  • 9Medin,D.L.1989.“Concepts and conceptual structure”.American Psychologist4.pp1-55.
  • 10Solomon K O,D L Medin&E.Lynch.1999.“Concepts do more than categorize”.Trends in Cognitive Sciences3.pp99-105.

二级参考文献139

  • 1何其莘,殷桐生,黄源深,刘海平.关于外语专业本科教育改革的若干意见[J].外语教学与研究,1999,31(1):25-29. 被引量:598
  • 2毕家驹.大学国际化的实践与展望[J].高教发展与评估,2005,21(2):8-11. 被引量:12
  • 3张晓鹏.美国大学创新人才培养模式探析[J].中国大学教学,2006(3):7-11. 被引量:302
  • 4薛涌.从哈佛教改方案看大学宗旨[J].中国新闻周刊,2006(41):88-88. 被引量:5
  • 5McRae K, Cree G S. Factors underlying category-specific semantic deficits. In: Forde M E, Humphreys G Weds. Category specificity in brain and mind. New York: Psychology Press,2002. 211~249
  • 6Markman A B, Wisniewski E J. Similar and Different: The Differentiation of Basic-level Categories. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 1997, 23(1):54~74
  • 7Estes Z, Glucksberg S. Interactive property attribution in concept combination. Memory & Cognition, 2000, 28(1): 28~34
  • 8Estes Z, Glucksberg S. Similarity and attribution in concept combination: Reply to Wisniewski. Memory & Cognition,2000, 28(1): 39~40
  • 9Bock J S, Clifton C. The role of salience in conceptual combination. Memory & Cognition, 2000, 28(8): 1378~1386
  • 10Costello F J, Keane M T. Efficient Creativity: Constraintguided conceptual combination. Cognitive Science, 2000, 24(2): 299~349

共引文献179

同被引文献78

引证文献6

二级引证文献15

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部