摘要
目的探讨超声造影反映肝硬化进程中肝血流灌注的变化规律。方法对40例肝硬化患者(病例组)和25例健康人(对照组)进行超声造影检查,应用QLAB分析软件,将肝实质作为感兴趣区绘制时间-强度曲线,测量肝动脉灌注时间(Tap)及肝动脉灌注强度(Iap),肝实质灌注达峰时间(Tpeak)及肝实质灌注峰值强度(Ipeak),门静脉灌注达峰时间(Tpp,Tpp=Tpeak—Taf)及门静脉灌注强度(Ipp,Ipp=Ipeak-Iaf),计算Ipp/Ipeak值。比较两组间Ipp、Ipeak、Ipp及Ipp/Ipeak的差异,并应用受试者操作特性(ROC)曲线进行分析。结果病例组与对照组比较,Iap增大(P〈0.001),Ipp、Ipp/Ipeak均缩小(P〈0.001)。而Ipeak在两组间差异无统计学意义。Ipp、Ipp、Ipp/Ipeak诊断肝硬化的灵敏度分别为67.3%、92.7%、96.4%,特异度分别为80.0%、96.0%、92.3%。结论超声造影参数可以反映肝硬化肝血流灌注的变化,尤其Ipp/Ipeak在肝硬化和正常肝之间存在显著差异。
Objective To evaluate hepatic perfusion assessed by contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (CEUS) for predicting cirrhosis accurately and non-invasively. Methods Forty patients with cirrhosis and twenty-five healthy controls were given CEUS examination, and time-intensity curves were drawn as the regions of interest located in liver parenchyma by using QLAB analyzing soft. The parameters of the two groups as follows; intensity of arterial perfusion (Ipp), intensity of total perfusion of liver parenchyma (Ipeak) ,intensity of portal venous perfusion (Ipp), the ratio of portal venous perfusion and total perfusion (Ipp/Ipeak) were compared by independent-samples t test, and the diagnostic value of parameters were analyzed by receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve. Results Iap was bigger,while Ipp,Ipp/Ipeak were smaller in patients than that in controls( P 〈0. 001). But there was no significant difference on Ipeak between the two groups. When Ipp ,Ipp ,Ipp/Ipeak were used for the diagnosis of cirrhosis, the sensitivity were 67.3%, 92.7%,96.4% and the specificity were 80.0%, 96.0%, 92.3%, respectively. Conclusions CEUS can reflect the changes of the blood perfusion of cirrhotic liver. CEUS parameters Ipp, Ipp, Ipp/ Ipeak are significant different between the two groups and can be the non-invasive diagosis parameters of cirrhosis.
出处
《中华超声影像学杂志》
CSCD
北大核心
2012年第3期201-204,共4页
Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
基金
基金项目:首都临床特色应用研究(D101100050010006)
关键词
超声检查
微气泡
肝硬化
Ultrasonography
Microbubbles
Liver cirrhosis