期刊文献+

超声双重造影评价胰腺癌侵犯胰周血管的初步应用 被引量:4

Preliminary application of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography to assess the peripancreatic vascular invasion of pancreatic carcinoma
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨超声双重造影(DcEus)在评价胰腺癌侵犯胰周血管中的应用价值。方法经手术病理证实的胰腺癌患者28例,术前行DCEUS检查,观察病灶与周围血管的关系,判断血管受侵犯的程度,并与手术结果进行对比。采用Kappa法对该方法的重复性进行检验。结果28例患者中,术中诊断血管侵犯者21例,无血管侵犯者7例。DCEUS判断胰周血管受侵犯者18例,无血管侵犯者10例,其诊断灵敏度为85.71%,特异度为100%,阳性预测值为100%,阴性预测值为70.00%,准确率为89.29%,且具有较高的重复性(Kappa观察者间=0.75,Kappa观察者内=0.80)。结论DCEUS可以准确、可靠地评价胰腺癌对胰周血管的侵犯情况。 Objective To investigate the clinical value of double contrast-enhanced ultrasonography (DCEUS) in assessing the peripancreatic vascular invasion of pancreatic carcinoma. Methods Twenty-eight patients with pancreatic cancer confirmed by postoperative pathology were examined by DCEUS preoperatively. The relationship between neoplasms and peripancreatic vessels was analyzed for assessing whether vascular invasion of pancreatic cancer had occurred. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value,negative predictive value and accuracy of DCEUS in evaluating vascular involvement were calculated by using the surgical results as a gold standard. Kappa test was used for assessing the intra- and interobserver reliability of DCEUS. Results In total 28 patients,21 cases were diagnosed as vascular invasion, whereas,7 cases were noninvasive by surgical results. By DCEUS, 18 cases were assessed as positive involvement of vessels, whereas, 10 cases were negative. The sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, negative predictive value and accuracy of DCEUS in evaluating vascular involvement were 85.71 %, 100%, 100 0/00,70.00 % and 89.29 % respectively, and with higher reliability (Kappa inter = 0.75, Kappa intra = 0.80). Conclusions DCEUS could be considered as a novel method to assess vascular invasion of pancreatic carcinoma accurately and reliably.
出处 《中华超声影像学杂志》 CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期209-212,共4页 Chinese Journal of Ultrasonography
基金 基金项目:浙江省医药卫生科学研究基金计划(2010KYB059)
关键词 超声检查 微气泡 胰腺肿瘤 血管侵犯 Ultrasonography Microbubbles Pancreatic neoplasms Vascular invasion
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

二级参考文献46

共引文献55

同被引文献39

  • 1l)'Onofrio M. Malago R, Zamboni C-, et al. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography better identifies pancreatic tumor vascularization than helical CT. Pancreatology,2005,5:398-402.
  • 2Shaib YH, Davila JA, EI-Serag HB. The epidemiology of pan- creatic cancer in the United States: changes below the surface [J]. Aliment Pharmacol Ther, 2006, 24(1): 87-94.
  • 3Jemal A, Siegel R, Ward E, et al. Cancer statistics, 2009 [J]. CA Cancer J Clin, 2009, 59(4): 225-249.
  • 4Bottger TC, Boddin J, Duber C, et al. Diagnosing and staging of pancreatic carcinoma-What is necessary? [J]. Oncology, 1998, 55(2): 122-129.
  • 5Bipat S, Phoa SS, van Delden OM, et al. Ultrasonography, computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging for diagnosis and determining resectability of pancreatic aden- ocarcinoma: a meta-analysis [J]. J Comput Assist Tomogr, 2005, 29(4): 438-445.
  • 6DeWitt J, Devereaux B, Chriswell M, et al. Comparison of endoscopic ultrasonography and multidetector computed to- mography for detecting and staging pancreatic cancer [J]. Ann Intern Med, 2004, 141(10): 753-763.
  • 7Legmann P, Vignaux O, Dousset B, et al. Pancreatic tumors: comparison of dual-phase helical CT and endoscopic sonography [J]. AJR Am J Roentgenol, 1998, 170(5): 1315-1322.
  • 8Horwhat JD, Paulson EK, McGrath K, et al. A randomized comparison of EUS-guided FNA versus CT or US-guided FNA for the evaluation of pancreatic mass lesions [J]. Gastrointest Endosc, 2006, 63(7): 966-975.
  • 9Agarwal B, Correa AM, Ho L. Survival in pancreatic carci- noma based on tumor size [J]. Pancreas, 2008, 36(1): e15-20.
  • 10谢晓燕,许尔蛟,徐辉雄,徐作峰,刘广健,郑艳玲,梁瑾瑜,黄蓓,吕明德.超声造影表现在胰腺实性局灶性病变鉴别诊断中的意义[J].中国医学科学院学报,2008,30(1):35-39. 被引量:28

引证文献4

二级引证文献30

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部