中西“名实”观对语义悖论消解之比较

A Comparison of the Chinese and Western "Name-Effect" Theory and Different Solutions to Semantic Paradox

名实问题不仅是哲学问题,还涉及语言、逻辑学等领域。无论中国还是西方哲学都对语言与实在的关系问题给予了高度重视,积累了丰富的理论成果。然而,中西方名实观的认知差异导致逻辑学的发展在中西方出现了不同的侧重:西方强调的是分析性的逻辑思维模式;而中国的基本思维模式则是综合性的辩证思维。思维方式的差异,引起了中西方对语义悖论产生根源的不同看法。如何将逻辑思维和辩证思维有机结合,这无疑为语义悖论的消解提供了新的视角和方法。

The study of the relationship between Ming （term） and Shi （object） is always the core of Chinese and Western philosophy. The paper compares the Chinese and Western nameeffect theory and indicates different solutions to semantic paradox based on different logical thinking between the East and the West.