期刊文献+

再论中英两国的人治与法治传统──以权利保障方式的不同为分析视角 被引量:3

The Comparison of Tradition between the Chinese Rule of Man and the British Rule of Law:in Perspective of Ways of the Right Protection
原文传递
导出
摘要 以权利保障方式不同为比较视角,可以明显发现中英两国传统社会在治理形态上的差异:自中世纪以来英国人保障权利的方式主要依赖于独立于国王之外的宪政法律制度,国王只是宪政法律制度的守护者、执行者;而在传统中国,权利的保障并不依赖独立于皇帝之外的宪政法律制度而是依赖于好皇帝。将中英两国人治传统与法治传统的差异由历史事实上升到历史认识有利于深层次、整体性地理解中英两国一些制度性安排的不同及其背后理念差异。 We can clearly find the differences between Chinese and British governance patterns in comparative perspective of right protection. Right protection in Britain mainly depends on the constitutional legal systems which are independent from the king since the medieval time. However, in China, right protection is dependent on the emperor. These will contribute to a deep, overall understanding of the difference between Chinese and British about some institutional arrangements and the philosophy behind the ways of the right protection.
作者 魏建国
出处 《中国政法大学学报》 2012年第2期22-31,159,共10页 Journal Of CUPL
基金 黑龙江省普通高校青年学术骨干支持计划项目<诚信社会建设与良法之治关系论>(1155G42) 黑龙江大学杰出青年科学基金项目<诚信社会建设与良法之治互动关系研究>(JC2010W3)之成果
  • 相关文献

参考文献11

同被引文献25

  • 1孟广林.中西封建君主制中的“法治”与“人治”[J].史学理论研究,2008(3):137-146. 被引量:6
  • 2高艳红,戴卫平.英国贵族体制及贵族文化刍议[J].广西社会科学,2007(9):180-183. 被引量:9
  • 3杨国枢.1993,《中国人的社会取向:社会互动的观点》.杨国枢,余安邦主编.《中国人的心理与行为:理论与方法篇》,台北:桂冠图书公司.
  • 4De Cremer D, & Tyler T R. The effects of trust in authority and procedural fairness on cooperation. Jour- nal of Applied Psychology, 2007, 29(3) : 639-649.
  • 5Thibaut J W, & Walker L. Procedural justice: A psy- chological analysis. L. Erlbaum Associates, distributed by the I-Ialsted Press Division of Wiley, 1975.
  • 6Heslin P A, & Walle D V. Performance appraisal pro- cedural justice: The role of a manager's implicit per- son theory. Journal of Management, 2011, 37 (6): 1694-1718.
  • 7van Dijke M, De Cremer D, Mayer D M, et al. When does procedural fairness promote organizational citizenship behavior? Integrating empowering leader- ship types in relational justice models. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2012, 117 (2) : 235-248.
  • 8De Cremer D, & Tyler T R. Managing group behav- ior: The interplay between procedural justice, sense of self, and cooperation. In M. Zanna (Ed.), Advances in experimental social psychology. New York: Aca- demic Press, 2005, (37): 151-218.
  • 9Van den Bos K, Wilke H A M do we need procedural fairness? & Lind E A. When The role of trust inauthority. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1998, 75(6): 1449-1458.
  • 10Colquitt J A, Scott B A, Rodell J B, et al. Justice at the millennium, a decade later: A meta-analytic test of social exchange and affect-based perspectives. Journal of Applied Psychology, 2013, 98 (2): 199- 236.

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部