关于完善我国商标确权制度司法程序的思考

Thinking about How to Improve Our Judicial Procedure System for Trademark Rights Confirmation

对商标评审委员会商标确权行为的法律性质进行了分析,认为根据所使用公权力类型的不同可分为行政复议和行政裁决,并对其中存在的问题进行了阐述。由于目前我国《商标法》和有关法律法规对这两类案件的诉讼程序的规定还不够完备,导致在实践中出现很多问题,因此提出对于属于行政裁决的商标评审案件诉讼程序可以借鉴日本"当事人诉讼"制度的相关做法,在立法上作出一个特殊规定,规定这类行政裁决案件的一方当事人可以另一方当事人为被告提起诉讼,法院应当在提起诉讼时通知商标评审委员会,而诉讼的类别仍然是行政诉讼。另外,应当赋予法院对这类案件所涉行政行为的司法变更权,以保证公权力的完整、有效,以及避免权力冲突引发的问题。

To analysis the the action of trademark right confirmation of the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board,consider of under the use of two different types of public power,the action of trademark right confirmation can be divided into two types of administrative actions,administrative review and administrative rulings,and to discuss the problems from which.Because China＇s ＂Trademark Law＂ and relevant laws and regulations are not complete on those litigation proceedings,results a lot of problems in practice.Propose the litigating proceedings of Trademark Review and adjudication action which belongs to administrative rulings may to draw lessons from Japanese ＂party litigation＂ system for reference,to make a special provision,one party of the administrative ruling cases can sue the other party as a defendant,and the court should notify the Trademark Review and Adjudication Board,but still defined the suit as administrative litigation.In addition,courts should be given the judicial variation right upon administrative actions in such cases to ensure the integrity of public power,effective,and to avoid power conflicts.