期刊文献+

重新思考NGOs问责 被引量:4

Rethinking NGOs Accountability
下载PDF
导出
摘要 NGOs问责的涵义可以从控制-交待、外部-内部、过程-机制三个不同的视角来理解。这就形塑了不同的NGOs问责型态,如等级问责和整体问责、功能问责和战略问责、外部控制和内部回应为基础的问责矩阵等等。这些问责型态不仅在理论上存在瑕疵,而且导致不合理的NGOs问责实践。可以根据问责的来源和问责关注的期限这两个维度建立一个整合的NGOs问责框架。该框架包含四种问责型态:效益问责、使命问责、结果问责和发展问责。这个新的理论框架进一步发展了NGOs问责的涵义,同时能够帮助利益相关者调整观察NGOs活动的关注点以提升NGOs的问责性,也有助于NGOs看清不同的问责力量,并判断怎样才能对自身的行为负责。研究的主要局限在于,提出的理论框架是一般意义上的,在实际应用中需要根据不同的NGOs类型及其运行的外部环境对框架的内容和侧重点进行调整。 The objective of this research is to rethink NGOs accountability and propose a new accountability framework. The paper is framed within a theoretical conception of NGOs accountability and is mainly literature-based. The research finds that seen from three different aspects, the meaning of NGOs accountability is so distinct that multiple types of NGOs accountability are shaped,such as hierarchical and holistic accountability,functional and strategic accountability,accountability matrix based on external control-internal response,and so on. Those types not only have flaws in theory,but also lead to irrational and unreasonable NGOs accountability in practice. According to two dimensions of accountability source and time limit's concern,an integral NGOs accountability framework is built. The framework is made up of efficacy accountability,mission accountability,outcome accountability and development accountability. The principal limitation of the study is that it proposes a general framework,which ought to be further carve in practice in the light of different kinds of NGOs and environment which they operate in. The important implications relate to:a more wider and comprehensive angle of view on NGOs accountability, and the impelling appearance of more rich insights of the NGOs accountability literature. The proposed theoretical framework can help stakeholders rectify the focus of examining NGOs activity so as to promote NGOs accountability,and make NGOs identify clearly different accountability strengths and judge how to hold responsible for their actions. The concept of NGOs accountability is further developed by examination of the three perspective of understanding NGOs accountability. And the new NGOs accountability framework proposed can also remedy deficiencies of the previous research literature.
作者 傅金鹏
出处 《公共管理学报》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期94-103,127,共10页 Journal of Public Management
关键词 NGOS 问责 问责型态 NGOs, Accountability, Accountability Framework
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1EBRAHIM A. Making Sense of Accountability:Conceptual Perspectives for Northern and Southern Nonprofits[J]. Nonprofit Management and Leadership ,2003,14(2) : 191-212.
  • 2里贾纳·E·赫兹琳杰.公众对非营利组织和政府的信任可以恢复吗?[C]//里贾纳·E·赫兹琳杰,等.非营利组织管理.北京:中国人民大学出版社,2004.
  • 3JORDON L,TUILI V P. Rights and Responsibilities in the Political Landscape of NGO Accountability:Introduction and Overview [M]//JORDON L,TUILI P. NGO Accountability:Polities, Principles and Innovations. London: Sterling VA, 2006.
  • 4O'DWYER B, UNERMAN J. The Paradox of Greater NGO Accountability:A Case Study of Amnesty Ireland [J]. Accounting, Organizations and Society, 2008, 33 (7-8): 801-824.
  • 5BOVENS M. Analysing and Assessing Accountability:A Conceptual Framework [ J ]. European Law Journal, 2007, 13 (4) : 447-468.
  • 6BRETI? A E. Voluntary Agencies as Development Organiza- tions:Theorizing the Problem of Efficiency and Accountability [J]. Development and Change, 1993, 24(2): 269-303.
  • 7MULGAN R. Accountability:An Even-Expanding Concept? [J]. Public Administration, 2000, 78(3) : 555-573.
  • 8KEARNS P K. The Strategic Management of Accountability in Nonprofit Organizations: An Analytical Framework I J]. Public Administration Review, 1994, 54(2): 185-192.
  • 9JEPSON P. Governance and Accountability of Environmenta N GOs[J]. Environmental Science & Policy, 2005 (8): 515- 524.
  • 10KOPPELL G S J. Pathologies of Accountability:ICANN and the Challenge of "Multiple Accountabilities Disorder" [J]. Public Administration Review, 2005, 65(1 ): 94-108.

共引文献1

同被引文献51

  • 1朱英.戊戌时期民间慈善公益事业的发展[J].江汉论坛,1999(11):66-71. 被引量:29
  • 2王卫平.论中国传统慈善事业的近代转型[J].江苏社会科学,2005(1):212-217. 被引量:35
  • 3邓国胜.非营利组织评估体系研究[J].中国行政管理,2001(10):41-43. 被引量:62
  • 4邓国胜.慈善组织培育与发展的政策思考[J].社会科学研究,2006(5):119-123. 被引量:42
  • 5范宝俊.慈善组织建设和慈善事业的发展.慈善,2010,.
  • 6孙炳耀.中国社会团体官民二重性问题.中国社会科学季刊,1994,(1):17-23.
  • 7T.Shanin,E.U.Weizsacher.《避免有害的二元论:介于政府与企业之间的市民社会》,(德)魏伯乐等:《私有化的局限》,王小卫等译,上海三联出版社,2006年.第493-496页.
  • 8(美)莱斯特·M.萨拉蒙.《公共服务中的伙伴-现代福利国家中政府与非营利组织的关系》,田凯译,商务印书馆,2008年,第40页.
  • 9(英)亚当·斯密.《国民财富的性质和原因的研究》(下卷),郭大力,王亚南译,商务印书馆,2003年,第253页.
  • 10(英)埃德蒙·惠特克.《经济思想流派》,徐宗士译,社会人民出版社,1974年,第155页.

引证文献4

二级引证文献7

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部