期刊文献+

单侧微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合内固定治疗腰椎退变性疾病 被引量:16

Unilateral minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar diseases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨采用单侧微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合(minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,MiTLIF)内固定治疗腰椎退变性疾病的临床效果。方法 2009年1月~2011年4月采用微创单侧椎弓根钉棒联合单Cage固定经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗表现为单侧下肢神经根症状的腰椎退行性变患者36例,观察手术时间、术中出血量及并发症发生情况,影像学观察椎间隙高度及椎间融合情况,采用疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analoguescale,VAS)评分和日本骨科学会(Japanese Orthopaedic Association,JOA)评分评估临床效果。结果 36例患者平均手术时间为90 min;术中平均出血量为150 mL。3例出现并发症,硬脊膜撕裂2例,术中予以修补,其中1例出现脑脊液漏,经对症处理术后6 d内脑脊液漏停止;1例术后出现神经缺失症状加重,通过及时血肿清除、神经根减压后损伤症状消失。所有患者平均随访18.6个月。末次随访矢状面X线片示椎间隙高度从术前(5.78±1.92)mm增至(10.35±1.21)mm,椎间融合率为94.4%。末次随访腰痛VAS评分及腰腿痛VAS评分与术前相比显著改善,差异有统计学意义(P<0.01),JOA改善率为84.4%。结论单侧MiTLIF内固定治疗腰椎退变性疾病对腰椎后部结构破坏小,术中出血少,椎间隙高度恢复满意,并发症发生率低,手术疗效好,是一种有效的治疗方法。 Objective To evaluate the clinical outcomes of unilateral minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MiTLIF) for degenerative lumbar diseases.Methods From January 2009 to April 2011,36 patients with degenerative lumbar diseases combined with unilateral lower extremity radicular symptoms underwent MiTLIF.Operation time,blood loss and complications were recorded.Intervertebral height and fusion rate were observed by radiographic data.Visual analogue scale(VAS) and Japanese Orthopaedic Association(JOA) scores were used for clinical assessment.Results The average operation time was 90 min and average intraoperative blood loss was 150 mL in the 36 patients.Complications were noted in 3 patients.Spinal dura matter tearing occurred in 2 patients and was repaired during the operation;of them,one had leakage of cerebrospinal fluid,which ceased 6 d after symptomatic treatment.Nerve root irritation developed postoperatively in one patient and was resolved after evacuation of hematoma and decompression.The mean follow-up was 18.6 months.X-ray films at the final follow-up showed that the intervertebral height increased from preoperative(5.78±1.92) mm to postoperative(10.35±1.21) mm and the fusion rate was 94.4%.The VAS scores of low back pain and leg pain were significantly decreased at the final follow-up,and the differences between preoperative and the final follow-up VAS scores had statistical significance(P0.01).The improvement rate of JOA was 84.4%.Conclusion With little disorganization of posterior lumbar vertebra,less intraoperative blood loss,satisfactory intervertebral height recovery and low incidence rate of complications.Unilateral MiTLIF is an effective method for degenerative lumbar diseases.
出处 《脊柱外科杂志》 2012年第1期9-12,共4页 Journal of Spinal Surgery
关键词 腰椎 椎间盘移位 椎管狭窄 脊柱融合术 内固定器 外科手术 微创性 Lumbar vertebral Intervertebral disk displacement Spinal stenosis Spinal fusion Internal fixators Surgical procedures minimally invasive
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Wang J,Zhou Y,Zhang ZF,et al.Comparison of one-level mini-mally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion indegenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2[J].Eur Spine J,2010,19(10):1780-1784.
  • 2Scheufler KM,Dohmen H,Vougioukas VI.Percutaneous transfo-raminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerativelumbar instability[J].Neurosurgery,2007,60(4 Suppl 2):203-212.
  • 3Suk SI,Lee CK,Kim WJ,et al.Adding posterior lumbar inter-body fusion to pedicle screw fixation and posterolateral fusion afterdecompression in spondylolytic spondylolisthesis[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),1997,22(2):210-220.
  • 4Huskisson EC.Measurement of pain[J].Lancet,1974,2(7889):1127-1131.
  • 5Fukui M,Chiba K,Kawakami M,et al.Japanese OrthopaedicAssociation Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire.Part 2.Verifica-tion of its reliability:The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain andCervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Commit-tee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association[J].J Orthop Sci,2007,12(6):526-532.
  • 6Harms J,Rolinger H.A one-stager procedure in operative treat-ment of spondylolistheses:dorsal traction-reposition and anteriorfusion(author’s transl)[J].Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb,1982,120(3):343-347.
  • 7Yan DL,Pei FX,Li J,et al.Comparative study of PILF andTLIF treatment in adult degenerative spondylolisthesis[J].EurSpine J,2008,17(10):1311-1316.
  • 8蔡明,郦志文,何腾峰,李方财,陈其昕.经椎间孔单枚融合器植骨椎体间融合术治疗腰椎疾患[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2010,20(6):520-521. 被引量:10
  • 9Foley KT,Holly LT,Schwender JD.Minimally invasive lumbarfusion[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2003,28(15 Suppl):S26-35.
  • 10Schwender JD,Holly LT,Rouben DP,et al.Minimally invasivetransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF):technical feasi-bility and initial results[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2005,18Suppl:S1-6.

二级参考文献31

  • 1范顺武,方向前,赵兴,赵凤东,虞和君.微创经椎间孔腰椎椎体间融合术治疗下腰椎疾病[J].中华骨科杂志,2007,27(2):81-85. 被引量:54
  • 2Humphreys SC, Hodges SD, Patwardhan AG, et al. Comparison of posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbody fusion [J]. Spine, 2001,26:567-571.
  • 3Harms JG, Jeszenszky D. The unilateral, transforaminal approach for posterior lumbar interbody fusion[ J]. Orthop Traumatol, 1998, 6:88 - 99.
  • 4Moskowitz A. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [ J ]. Orthop Clin North Am ,2002,33:359 - 366.
  • 5Burak MO, Kevin Y, et al. Minimally - invasive technique for transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) [JJ. Eur Spine J,2005,14 : 887 - 894.
  • 6Christopher P, Ames A, Frank L,et al. Biomeehanical eomparision of posterior lumbar interbody fusion and transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion performed at 1 and 2 levels [ J ]. Spine ,2005,19:562 -566.
  • 7Annette K, Werner S, Erich K. In vitro stabilizing effect of a transforaminal compared with two posterior lumbar interbody fusion cages [ J]. Spine, 2005,22:665 - 670.
  • 8Haid RWJr, McLaughlin MR, Fessler RG. Lumbar interbody fusion techniques : cages, dowels and grafts [ M ]. St. Louis : Quality Medical Publishing, 2003,227-234.
  • 9Hackenberg L, Henry H, Viola B,et al. Transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a safe technique with satisfactory three to five year resuits[ J]. Spine ,2005,14:551 - 558.
  • 10CHIN Z, Zhao J, LIU A. Surgical treatment of recurrent lumbar disc heniation by transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion [ J ]. International Orthopaedics, 2008, 21:12.

共引文献27

同被引文献143

  • 1孟繁星,彭嘉斌.腰椎间盘突出症单纯髓核摘除术术后复发的相关因素研究[J].总装备部医学学报,2014(1):10-13. 被引量:5
  • 2金柏军,钱宇,徐国健.下腰痛患者与腰椎前凸度及骶骨倾斜度的关系[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2004,14(6):364-365. 被引量:21
  • 3王文军,王麓山,胡文凯,姚女兆.内窥镜下髓核摘除术常见问题与对策(附570例分析)[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2005,13(23):1779-1781. 被引量:4
  • 4周跃,王健,初同伟,李长青,王卫东,郑文杰,张正丰,郝勇,潘勇.经皮椎弓根螺钉固定、内窥镜下腰椎管减压、椎间融合的临床应用[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2007,17(5):333-336. 被引量:55
  • 5Oppenheimer JH, DeCastro I, McDonnell DE. Minimally invasive spine technology and minimally invasive spine surgery: a histori- cal review[ J]. Neurosurg Focus, 2009, 27 (3) : E9.
  • 6Young S, Veerapen R, O' Laoire SA. Relief of lumbar canal ste- nosis using multilevel subarticular fenestrations as an alternative to wide laminectomy : preliminary report [ J ]. Neurosurgery, 1988, 23 ( 5 ) :628-633.
  • 7McCulloch JA, Young PH. Essentials of spinal microsurgery [ M ]. Philadelphia, PA : Lippincott-Raven, 1998.
  • 8Huskisson EC. Measurement of pain [J]. Lancet, 1974, 2 (7889) :1127 - 1131.
  • 9Fukui M, Chiba K, Kawakami M, et al. Japanese Orthopaedic Association Back Pain Evaluation Questionnaire. Part 2. Verifica- tion of its reliability : The Subcommittee on Low Back Pain and Cervical Myelopathy Evaluation of the Clinical Outcome Commit- tee of the Japanese Orthopaedic Association [ J ]. J Orthop Sci, 2007, 12(6) :526 -532.
  • 10Schizas C, Tzinieris N, Tsiridis E, et al. Minimally invasive ver- sus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: evaluating initial experience[J]. Int Orthop, 2009, 33(6) :1683-1688.

引证文献16

二级引证文献95

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部