期刊文献+

微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术翻修治疗腰椎退变性疾病 被引量:14

Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion as revision surgery for lumbar degenerative diseases
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的回顾性分析微创经椎间孔腰椎椎间融合术(minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion,MiTLIF)翻修治疗腰椎退变性疾病的临床结果和并发症。方法 2006年3月~2010年11月,对103例已行单纯椎间盘髓核摘除和神经减压复发者,采用MiTLIF翻修治疗并获得随访。男45例,女58例,平均53.4岁。采用MiTLIF和经皮椎弓根螺钉固定,其中单节段97例,双节段6例。收集分析手术时间、术中术后出血量、放射线暴露时间和并发症。采用视觉模拟量表(visual analog scale,VAS)评分和Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI)评估临床结果,末次随访时行腰椎动力位X线片和薄层CT扫描重建检查评价椎间融合情况。结果所有患者随访12~49个月,平均26.1个月。术中出血量为(358±67)mL,术后出血量为(52±20)mL,放射线暴露时间为(42±13)s。术前及末次随访腰痛VAS评分分别为6.3±2.5和0.7±0.3,术前及末次随访腿痛VAS评分分别为7.5±2.4和0.6±0.2,末次随访腰腿痛VAS评分与术前比较差异均有统计学意义(t=2.43及t=2.57,P<0.05)。术前及末次随访ODI分别为41.5±5.3和13.1±2.8,差异有统计学意义(t=4.39,P<0.01)。末次随访椎间融合率为95.2%(98/103)。发生神经根损伤4例,切口表浅感染4例,一过性下肢麻木12例,硬膜撕裂5例。结论针对初次单纯椎间盘髓核摘除和神经减压复发者,MiTLIF是一种安全有效的技术。 Objective To retrospectively analyze the clinical outcomes and complications of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(MiTLIF) as revision surgery in the treatment of lumbar degenerative lumbar diseases.Methods From March 2006 to November 2010,103 patients with recurrent lumbar degenerative diseases after primary discectomy and decompression were treated with MiTLIF and followed up.There were 45 males and 58 females with an average age of 53.4 years.During MiTLIF and percutaneous pedicle screw fixation,single level procedure was performed in 97 patients,and 2 level procedures were performed in 6 patients.The operative time,blood loss,X-ray exposure time and complications were recorded.Clinical outcomes were assessed by visual analog scale(VAS) scores and Oswestry disability index(ODI).Fusion rates were determined by CT scan reconstruction and dynamic lumbar radiography at the final follow-up.Results The average follow-up lasted 26.1 months(range from 12 to 49 months).The intraoperative and postoperative blood losses were(358±67) mL and(52±20) mL,respectively.The average radiation exposure time was(42±13) s.There was significant difference between VAS scores for low back pain before operation and at the final follow up(6.3±2.5 vs.0.7±0.3,t=2.43,P0.05).So were the VAS scores for leg pain and the ODI(7.5±2.4 vs.0.6±0.2,t=2.57,P0.05;41.5±5.3 vs.13.1±2.8,t=4.39,P0.01).The fusion rate at the final follow-up was 95.2%(98/103).New nerve root injury occurred in 4 cases,superficial wound infection in 4 cases,transient leg numbness in 12 cases and dural tearing in 5 cases.Conclusion MiTLIF is a safe and effective procedure for recurrent lumbar degenerative diseases after primary discectomy and decompression.
出处 《脊柱外科杂志》 2012年第1期13-16,共4页 Journal of Spinal Surgery
关键词 腰椎 脊柱融合术 再手术 外科手术 微创性 Lumbar vertebrae Spinal fusion Reoperation Surgical procedures minimally invasive
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Cloward RB.History of PLIF:Forty years of personal experience[M]//Lin PM.Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.First edi-tion.New York:Springfield,Charles C Thomas,1982:58-71.
  • 2Steffee AD,Sitkowski DJ.Posterior lumbar interbody fusion andplates[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,1988,227:99-102.
  • 3Harms J,Jeszenszky D,Stolze D,et al.True spondylolisthesisreduction and more segmental fusion in spondylolisthesis[M]//Harms J.The Textbook of Spinal Surgery.Second edition.Phila-delphia:Lippincott-Raven,1997:1337-1347.
  • 4Humphreys SC,Hodges SD,Patwardhan AG,et al.Comparisonof posterior and transforaminal approaches to lumbar interbodyfusion[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2001,26(5):567-571.
  • 5Isaacs RE,Podichetty VK,Santiago P,et al.Minimally invasivemicroendoscopy-assisted transforaminal lumbar interbody fusionwith instrumentation[J].J Neurosurg Spine,2005,3(2):98-105.
  • 6Schwender JD,Holly LT,Rouben DP,et al.Minimally invasivetransforaminal lumbar interbody fusion(TLIF):technical feasi-bility and initial results[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2005,18Suppl:S1-6.
  • 7Scheufler KM,Dohmen H,Vougioukas VI.Percutaneous transfo-raminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of degenerativelumbar instability[J].Neurosurgery,2007,60(4 Suppl 2):203-212.
  • 8Wang J,Zhou Y,Zhang ZF,et al.Comparison of one-level mini-mally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion indegenerative and isthmic spondylolisthesis grades 1 and 2[J].Eur Spine J,2010,19(10):1780-1784.
  • 9Huskisson EC.Measurement of pain[J].Lancet,1974,2(7889):1127-1131.
  • 10Chow JH,Chan CC.Validation of the Chinese version of theOswestry Disability Index[J].Work,2005,25(4):307-314.

同被引文献160

引证文献14

二级引证文献57

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部