期刊文献+

两种不同方法置入Dynesys内固定的早期临床对比研究 被引量:1

Comparative study of early clinical outcomes of two different Dynesys system implantation approaches
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的比较单侧剥离半椎板切除潜行对侧扩大减压联合对侧经多裂肌间隙行Dynesys内固定与双侧剥离全椎板切除Dynesys内固定治疗退行性腰椎椎管狭窄症的早期临床效果和安全性。方法 2010年2月~2011年3月27例退行性腰椎椎狭窄患者(43个节段)行Dynesys内固定手术。15例(24个节段)行症状重侧单侧剥离半椎板切除,潜行对侧扩大减压,对侧经多裂肌间隙安装Dynesys内固定;12例(19个节段)行双侧暴露全椎板切除减压安装Dynesys内固定。通过对患者术前术后疼痛视觉模拟量表(visual analog scale,VAS)评分和腰背、下肢Oswestry功能障碍指数(Oswestry disability index,ODI),摄正侧位和动力位X线片,记录手术切口,术中术后出血量比较2种方法的临床效果和安全性。结果 27例患者得到8~20个月的随访。2组患者对比研究显示单侧剥离组的手术切口、肌肉创伤、术中出血量、术后引流量及术后初次腰痛评分改善程度优于双侧暴露安装组。影像学资料显示2组患者椎间隙前高、后高及椎间孔高度、面积均较术前明显增加。2组患者椎间隙前高、后高和椎间孔高度、面积改变量及术后节段活动度改变量差别不大。结论单侧剥离半椎板切除潜行对侧扩大减压联合对侧经多裂肌间隙行Dynesys内固定同样可以达到足够的减压效果;与双侧剥离全椎板切除减压Dynesys内固定相比,具有创伤小,术中、术后出血少,术后初次腰部疼痛评分优于后者等优点。 Objective To compare the early clinical outcomes and safety of hemilaminectomy with unilateral paravertebral dissection and laminectomy with bilateral paravertebral dissection for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis.Methods From February 2010 to March 2011,27 patients(43 segments) with degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis were treated by Dynesys internal fixation and divided into 2 groups according to the different Dynesys implantation approaches.In unilateral group,15 patients(24 segments) were treated by hemilaminectomy with unilateral paravertebral dissection and the contralateral decompression and Dynesys pedicle screw fixation via paravertebral muscle gaps.In bilateral group,12 patients(19 segments) were decompressed by laminectomy with bilateral paravertebral dissection and Dynesys internal fixation.Visual analog scale(VAS) scores and Oswestry disability index(ODI) were evaluated,and radiograph(anterioposterior,lateral,flexion and extension) were done preoperatively and postoperatively.The length of operative incision and the intraoperative and postoperative blood loss were recorded.Results The follow-up duration ranged from 8 to 20 months for all the patients.Compared with bilateral group,there were shorter operative incision,less muscle injury,less intraoperative and postoperative blood loss,and lower postoperative VAS scores in unilateral group.Radiologic data showed that the ventro and dorso height of intervertebral space and the height and width of intervertebral foramen were significantly increased in all the patients postoperatively.But there were no significant differences in the changes of the ventro and dorso height of intervertebral space,the height and width of intervertebral foramen and range of motion between the 2 groups.Conclusion Hemilaminectomy with unilateral paravertebral dissection followed by Dynesys pedicle screw fixation can achieve the same decompression with laminectomy.However,hemilaminectomy has less operative injury,less intraoperative and postoperative blood loss,and more back pain score improvement in early postoperation by than laminectomy.
出处 《脊柱外科杂志》 2012年第1期42-46,共5页 Journal of Spinal Surgery
关键词 腰椎 椎管狭窄 截骨术 减压术 外科 内固定器 Lumbar vertebrae Spinal stenosis Osteotomy Decompression surgical Internal fixators
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1Dubois G,de Germay B,Schaerer NS,Fennema P.Dynamicneutralization:a new concept for restabilization of the spine[M]//Szpalski M,Gunzburg R,Pope MH.Lumbar segmentalinstability.Philadelphia:Lippincott Williams&Wilkins,1999:233-240.
  • 2Schmoelz W,Huber JF,Nydegger T,et al.Dynamic stabilizationof the lumbar spine and its effects on adjacent segments:an invitro experiment[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2003,16(4):418-423.
  • 3Stoll TM,Dubois G,Schwarzenbach O.The dynamic neutraliza-tion system for the spine:a multi-center study of a novel non-fusion system[J].Eur Spine J,2002,11 Suppl 2:S170-178.
  • 4Schnake KJ,Schaeren S,Jeanneret B.Dynamic stabilization inaddition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degener-ative spondylolisthesis[J].Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2006,31(4):442-449.
  • 5Welch WC,Cheng BC,Awad TE,et al.Clinical outcomes of theDynesys dynamic neutralization system:1-year preliminary results[J].Neurosurg Focus,2007,22(1):E8.
  • 6Magerl FP.Stabilization of the lower thoracic and lumbar spinewith external skeletal fixation[J].Clin Orthop Relat Res,1984(189):125-141.
  • 7Huskisson EC.Measurement of pain[J].Lancet,1974,2(7889):1127-1131.
  • 8Chow JH,Chan CC.Validation of the Chinese version of theOswestry Disability Index[J].Work,2005,25(4):307-314.
  • 9Schaeren S,Broger I,Jeanneret B.Minimum four-year follow-upof spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis treated withdecompression and dynamic stabilization[J].Spine(Phila Pa1976),2008,33(18):E636-642.
  • 10张劲松,杨述华,许伟华,叶树楠.减压结合Dynesys动态稳定治疗退行性腰椎管狭窄症[J].中国矫形外科杂志,2010,18(11):881-883. 被引量:18

二级参考文献13

  • 1李超,乔济民,干阜生,张广信,乔颖刚.开窗减压术治疗中央型腰椎管狭窄症[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,1993,3(4):145-148. 被引量:20
  • 2尚培中,张振海.腰椎管狭窄症病理学研究进展[J].中国矫形外科杂志,1996,3(3):214-215. 被引量:5
  • 3刘郑生,侯克东,王岩,朱守荣,张永刚,肖嵩华,王征,陆宁,张雪松.老年退行性腰椎管狭窄症的手术疗效分析[J].中国脊柱脊髓杂志,2006,16(1):19-22. 被引量:26
  • 4Niosi CA, Zhu QA, Wilson DC,et al. Biomechanical characterization of the three - dimensional kinematic behaviour of the Dynesys dynamic stabilization system : an in vitro study [ J ]. Eur Spine J, 2006,15 : 913 -922.
  • 5Beastall J, Karadimas E, Siddiqui M, et al. The Dynesys lumbar spinal stabilization system:a preliminary report on positional magnetic resonance[ J]. Spine ,2007,32:685 - 690.
  • 6Putzier M, Schneider SV, Funk JF, et al. The surgical treatment of the lumbar disc prolapse: nucleotomy with additional transpedicular dy-namic stabilization versus nucleotomy alone [ J ]. Spine, 2005,30 : 109 -114.
  • 7Schnake K J, Schaeren S, Jeanneret B. Dynamic stabilization in addition to decompression for lumbar spinal stenosis with degenerative spondylolisthesis [ J ]. Spine ,2006,31:442 - 449.
  • 8Grob D, Benini A, Junge A,et al. Clinical experience with the Dynesys semirigid fixation system for the lumbar spine:surgical and patient - oriented outcome in 50 cases after an average of 2 years [ J ] . Spine ,2005,30:324 - 331.
  • 9Bothmann M, Kast E, Boldt GJ, et al. Dynesys fixation for lumbar spine degeneration[ J]. Neurosurg Rev, 2008, 31:189- 196.
  • 10付敦凯,涂胜.椎板间开窗减压术治疗腰椎管狭窄症[J].现代保健(医学创新研究),2007(08Z):56-56. 被引量:11

共引文献21

同被引文献11

  • 1CanaleST,BeatyJH.坎贝尔骨科手术学[M].王岩等主译.11版.北京:人民军医出版社,2009:1388-1452.
  • 2赫考维茨.腰椎外科学[M].海涌,郑召民,陈仲强,主译.3版.济南:山东科学技术出版社,2006:449-455.
  • 3BABB A, CARLSON W O. Spinal stenosis[J]. S D Med, 2006, 59(3) : 103 -105.
  • 4PRATT R K, FAIRBANK J C, VIRR A. The reliability of the Shuttle Walking Test, the Swiss Spinal Stenosis Questionnaire, the Oxford Spinal Stenosis Score, and the Oswestry Disability Index in the assessment of patients with lumbar spinal stenosis [ J ]. Spine, 2002, 27(1) : 84 -91.
  • 5EISEN A, HOIRCH M. The electrodiagnostic evaluation of spinal root lesions[J]. Spine, 1983, 8(1) : 98 -106.
  • 6WEINER B K, WALKER M, BROWER R S, et al. Microdecom- pression for lumbar spinal canal stenosis [ J ]. Spine ( Phila Pa 1976), 1999, 24(21) : 2268 -2272.
  • 7GEPSTEIN R, ARINZON Z, ADUNSKY A, et al. Decompression surgery for lumbar spinal stenosis in the elderly: preoperative ex- pectations and postoperative satisfaction [ J ]. Spinal Cord, 2006, 44(7) : 427 -431.
  • 8KATZ J N, LIPSON S J, LARSON M G, et al. The outcome of deeompressive laminectomy for degenerative lumbar stenosis [ J ]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 1991, 73(6) : 809 -811.
  • 9WARD S R, KIM C W, ENG C M, et al. Architectural analysis and intraoperative measurements demonstrate the unique design of the multifidus muscle for lumbar spine stability[ J]. J Bone Joint Surg Am, 2009, 91 ( 1 ) : 176 - 185.
  • 10FAN S W, HU Z J, ZHAO F, et al. Muhifidus muscle changes and clinical effects of one - level posterior lumbar interbody fusion : minimally invasive procedure versus conventional open approach [J]. Eur Spine J, 2010, 19(2): 316 -324.

引证文献1

二级引证文献22

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部