中国非英语专业本科生和研究生书面语体的多特征多维度调查被引量：41

MF and MD analysis of written texts produced by Chinese non-English major undergraduates and graduates

导出

摘要本研究采用多维度宏观分析和多特征微观分析相结合的方法,从五个维度对比分析四个中国英语学习者书面语语料库与LOCNESS之间的语体差异。研究发现:与美国大学生议论文相比,中国学习者书面语体的交互性和说服性较强,信息性、叙事性、指代明确性和抽象性都偏低。研究揭示出中国学习者的整体信息整合能力比较薄弱,也证实中国学习者作文确实存在明显的"口语化"倾向。在使用与特定交际功能相关的语言特征时,中国学习者表现出不同程度的偏离。研究还显示出学习者内部的语体意识差异很大。 By applying a multi-feature and multi-dimensional analysis,this study compares the stylistic differences between four corpora of written texts by Chinese learners and the LOCNESS corpus.It is found that,the Chinese learner corpora are high in Interactive and Persuasive dimensions,but low in Informative,Narrative,Explicit and Abstract dimensions.It reveals the common weaknesses of Chinese learners in terms of information integration and testifies to the oral-style features in Chinese learners' writing.Compared with LOCNESS,Chinese learners show different degrees of deviations when they use function-related language features.The study also demonstrates the internal variations in each group of learners.

作者潘璠

机构地区湖北省武汉市华中科技大学外国语学院

出处《外语教学与研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期220-232,320,共13页 Foreign Language Teaching and Research

基金教育部人文社科项目“基于MD/MF的中外期刊论文语体特征对比研究”(12YJA740060) 华中科技大学自主创新研究基金(2011WC029)的部分成果

关键词多特征多维度分析语料库书面语语体特征

分类号 H319.3 [语言文字—英语]

引文网络
相关文献

参考文献22

1Biber, D. 1988. Variation across Speech and Writing [M]. Cambridge: CUP.
2Biber, D. 2009. Multidimensional approaches [A]. In A. Liideling & M. Kyto (eds.). Corpus Linguistics: An International Handbook [C]. Berlin.. Walter de Gruyter. 822-855.
3Callies, M. 2009. Information Highlighting in Advanced Learner English [M]. Amsterdam.. John Benjamins.
4Cobb, T. 2003. Analyzing late interlanguage with learner corpora: Quebec replications of three European studies [J]. Canadian Modern Language Review 59.. 393-423.
5Connor, U. 1995. Examining syntactic variation across three English speaking nationalities through a multifeature/multidimensional approach [A]. In D. Rubin (ed.). Composing Social Identity in Written Language [C]. Hillsdale, N.J. : Lawrence Erlbaum. 75-87.
6Flowerdew, J. 2005. A taxonomy of learner errors in signalling nouns [R]. Paper presented at ICAME 26, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, 12-15 May, 2005.
7Grabe, W. & D. Biber. 1987. Freshmen student writing and the contrastive rhetoric hypothesis [R]. Paper presented at the Second Language Research Forum, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, February 1987.
8Granger, S., L. Jacques&S. Petch-Tyson (eds.). 2007. Corpus-basedApproaches to Contrastive Linguistics and Translation Studies [C]. Beijing.. Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
9Nesselhauf, N. 2005. Collocations in a Learner Corpus [M]. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
10Reppen, R. 1994. Variation in Elementary Student Language: A Multi-dimensional Perspective [D]. Ph.D. Dissertation, Northern Arizona University.