期刊文献+

基于熵权的并购绩效可拓物元综合评价 被引量:4

基于熵权的并购绩效可拓物元综合评价
下载PDF
导出
摘要 并购是资本市场永恒的主题,是优化上市公司资源配置、实现经济结构调整和产业升级的一种常用手段。传统的并购绩效评价方法以单一的财务指标为基础,并不能真正反映并购的实际效果。根据并购的经典理论,并结合我国上市公司的实际情况,并购绩效评价应采用综合评价方法,评价角度应从战略、财务和社会三个层面进行。综合评价方法既能全面反映并购实际的和长期的效果,也能体现我国当前大多数企业的性质和所应承担的责任,这使得并购绩效评价更有针对性和方向性。 M&A is the eternal theme of capital market of our country, and is a kind of common means of optimizing resource distribution, restructuring economic structure and upgrading industry of listed companies. The traditional approach of M&A performance evaluation set a single financial indicators as foundation, which can not truly reflect the actual effect of mergers and acquisi- tions. According to classical M&A theory, M&A performance should be evaluated from the three aspects of strategy, finance and society. A method of comprehensive evaluation can more completely reflect the actual acquisition and long - term effects, and be able to reflect the nature of majority of enterprises and their responsibilities so as to make the M&A performance e- valuation more clearly.
作者 周业旺
出处 《企业经济》 北大核心 2012年第3期76-79,共4页 Enterprise Economy
基金 湖北省教育厅科学技术项目"基于循环经济的湖北省物流可持续发展评价指标和方法研究"(批准号:2011bc053) 湖北省教育厅人文社科项目"中部经济欠发达地区物流与经济系统协调发展研究"(批准号:2011jyty096) 黄冈师范学院博士基金项目"中部经济欠发达地区物流与经济系统协调发展研究"(批准号:2011cd226)
关键词 并购 绩效 评价 可拓 M&A performance evaluation expandable
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献58

共引文献451

同被引文献21

  • 1汤文仙,朱才斌.国内外企业并购理论比较研究[J].经济经纬,2004,21(5):63-67. 被引量:21
  • 2蔡文,石勇.可拓学的科学意义与未来发展[J].哈尔滨工业大学学报,2006,38(7):1079-1086. 被引量:78
  • 3Sabatier V, Mangematin V, Rousselle T. From recipe to dinner: business model portfolios in the European biopharmaceutical industry [ J ]. Long Range Planning, 2010, 43 (2) : 431 - 447.
  • 4Golmohammadi A, Pajoutan M. Meta heuristics for dependent portfolio selection problem considering risk [ J ]. Expert Systems with Applications, 2011, 38 (5) : 5642 - 5649.
  • 5Carazo A F, G6mez T, Molina J, et al. Solving a comprehensive model for muhiobjective project portfolio selection[J]. Computers & operations research, 2010, 37 (4) : 630 - 639.
  • 6Araszo J A, Pajares J, Lopez-Paredes A. Simulating the dynamic scheduling of project portfolios[ J]. Simulation Modelling Practice and Theory, 2010, 18(10) : 1428 - 1441.
  • 7Smith-Perera A, Garcia-Mel6n M, Poveda-Bautista R, et al. A Project Strategic Index proposal for portfolio selection in electrical company based on the Analytic Network Process[ J]. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, 2010, 14(6) : 1569 - 1579.
  • 8Iamratanakul S, Shankar R, Dimmitt N J. Improving project portfolio management with strategic alignment[ C]//Management of Engineering & Technology, 2009. PICMET 2009. Portland International Conference on. IEEE, 2009 : 1290 - 1300.
  • 9Titus Jr V K, Covin J G, Slevin D P. Aligning strategic processes in pursuit of firm growth [ J ]. Journal of Business Research, 2011, 64(5): 446-453.
  • 10Gurtner A, Tschan F, Semmer N K, et al. Getting groups to develop good strategies: Effects of reflexivity interventions on team process, team performance, and shared mental models [ J ]. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 2007, 102(2) : 127 - 142.

引证文献4

二级引证文献12

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部