期刊文献+

派自己人监督:上级股东与公司的代理成本 被引量:5

Send One of Us to Supervise:Superior Shareholder and the Agency Cost of Corporation
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文在细分出公司中与终极控制人关系最为密切的三类股东并将其界定为上级股东的基础上,集中考察了上级股东在降低第一类代理问题方面的治理功能。研究发现,更高的代理冲突下,公司对上级股东的参与有着更高的需求,而上级股东的介入也能够降低公司的代理成本。进一步的研究还表明,上级股东的上述监督行为符合收益最大化的理性行为框架。并且,如果按传统股权制衡研究的范式将所有非第一大股东视为一个整体,并不能观测到上述结果。 Based on the recognizing of three types of blockholders who are mostly closed to the ultimate controller and defining them as superior shareholders,this article examines their governance effects on the agency problems between shareholder and manager.This paper argues that no matter from the perspective of ability or intention to consider,the superior shareholder,which is most closed to the ultimate controller,can be a better supervisor compares with other shareholders.And using the data of listed companies during 2001-2007 in Chinese securities market,using whether the ultimate controller of the company is direct holding as the proxy of the severity of agency problem between shareholder and manager,and measuring the agency cost by the pay for performance sensitivity of managers,this paper put forward the empirical evidence which is consistent with such inference.Specifically,this paper shows that,there is a significantly higher demand for superior shareholder when the agency problem of companies is more pronounced,and the introducing of superior shareholder can actually mitigate this kind of agency cost subsequently.Further study also reveals that the supervise behavior of superior shareholder is consistent with the framework of rational economic man.That’s to say,the governance effects of the superior shareholder are significantly positively related to the net benefits of his supervise behavior.And if we take all non-controlling shareholders as a whole,just like most of the existing research on the ownership structure,results mentioned above cannot be observed.Our findings indicate the effects of different relationship between stockholders and ultimate controller on their governance role,and reinforce the determinants of the governance effects of blockholders in Chinese listed firms are not their different nature as the research based on developed capital market declared,but the different relationship between stockholders and the ultimate controller.Thus,this paper sheds light on the further study on ownership structure of Chinese listed companies.
作者 孙亮 刘春
出处 《南开管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期4-12,共9页 Nankai Business Review
基金 国家自然科学基金项目(70972075) 中山大学青年教师起步计划项目(3281401)资助
关键词 股东关系 上级股东 代理成本 Shareholder Relations Superior Shareholder Agency Cost
  • 相关文献

参考文献28

  • 1Cronqvist H.,Fahlenbrach R.,Large Shareholders and Corpo-rate Policies.The Review of Financial Studies,2009,22(10):3941-3976.
  • 2Johnson S.,R.LaPorta,F.Lopez-de-Silanes,A.Shleifer.Tun-neling.American Economic Review,2000,90(2):22-27.
  • 3Fan J.P.H.,T.J.Wong,T.Y.Zhang.Institutions and Organiza-tional Structure:The Case of State-Owned Corporate Pyramids.Working Paper,The Chinese University of Hongkong.2009.
  • 4Rajan R.G.,J.Wulf.The Flattening Firm:Evidence on the Changing Nature of Firm Hierarchies from Panel Data.The Review of Economics and Statistics,2006,88(4):759-773.
  • 5Demsetz H..The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm.Journal of Law and Economics,1983,26(2):375-390.
  • 6Jensen M.,W.H.Meckling.Specific and General Knowledge and Organizational Structure.Journal of Applied Corporate Finance,1995,8(2):4-18.
  • 7Bebchuk L.A.,J.M.Fried.Executive Compensation as an Agency Problem.The Journal of Economic Perspectives,2003,17(3):71-92.
  • 8Gomes A.,W.Novaes.Sharing of Control as a Corporate Gover-nance Mechanism.Working Paper,The Wharton School.2003.
  • 9朱红军,汪辉.“股权制衡”可以改善公司治理吗?——宏智科技股份有限公司控制权之争的案例研究[J].管理世界,2004,20(10):114-123. 被引量:220
  • 10邓建平,曾勇,何佳.利益获取:股利共享还是资金独占?[J].经济研究,2007,42(4):112-123. 被引量:75

二级参考文献157

共引文献1829

引证文献5

二级引证文献54

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部