期刊文献+

控制权、租金保护与组织形式 被引量:2

Control Rights, Rent Protection and Organization Form
下载PDF
导出
摘要 本文首先扩展了Bennedsen和Wolfenzon的模型,分析了多个大股东并存的股权结构达到稳定性需要的条件,并发现了在法律制度不是很完善的情况下低成本的替代治理机制的存在才可能促进该种股权结构实现稳定。然后结合士兰微从建立至今12年股权结构演变的深度案例证明了适当的替代治理机制可以使得多个大股东并存的股权结构达到稳定的状态这一结论 ;但是,这种机制的选择也受到我国的制度背景和法律环境的影响。 This paper firstly extends the model of Bennedsen and Wolfenson(2000),and analyzes the conditions that assure the stability of ownership structure with multiple large shareholders.Two variables are critical to the stability of multiple large shareholders governance structure.They are implementation cost of substitute governance mechanism and the extent to which the relative legal system is effective and efficient.As pointed out in the paper,there are three different areas in which the multiple shareholders governance structure will be stable(instable).When the legal system is sufficiently effective,as in area B,the multiple shareholders governance structure will be definitely stale.When the legal system is to some extent inefficient and the implementation cost of substitute governance mechanism is sufficiently high,the multiple shareholders governance structure will be definitely instable,and the shareholders will compete for the control rights because of the private benefits.This is the case in area C.When the implementation cost of substitute governance mechanism is mildly high,and the legal system is to some extent efficient,the multiple shareholders governance structure will be stable if the right substitute governance structure is chosen.This is the case in area A.Furthermore,the analysis shows that the only mechanism assuring stability of this ownership structure must be a low-implementationcost one under the imperfect legal environment.The in-depth case study of Hangzhou Silan Microelectronics Co.,Ltd’s ownership structure evolution process of the past 12 years strongly supports the paper’s theoretical results.That is,ownership structure with multiple large shareholders will keep stable and will not necessarily result in the battle among the shareholders as long as there exists a reasonable system,which is influenced by the particular institutional backgrounds and the legal environments.At the end of the paper,some implications are developed for Chinese enterprises and government supervision departments.
出处 《南开管理评论》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第1期24-32,53,共10页 Nankai Business Review
基金 教育部新世纪优秀人才支持计划(NCET-07-0001)资助
关键词 控制权 租金保护 组织形式 控制权私人收益 Control Rights Rent Protection Organization Form Private Benefits of Control
  • 相关文献

参考文献18

  • 1Berle,A.,G.Means.The Modern Corporation and Private Property,New York,Macmillan,1932.
  • 2Grossman S.J.,Hart O.D..One Share-One Vote and The Mar-ket for Corporate Control,Journal of Financial Economics,1988,20(Jan-Mar):175-202.
  • 3Michael C.Jensen,William H.Meckling.Theory of The Firm:Managerial Behavior,Agency Costs and Ownership Structures.Journal of Financial Economics,1976,3(4):305-360.
  • 4Shleifer.A.,R.Vishny,Large Shareholders and Corporate Control,Journal of Political Economy,1986,94(3):461-488.
  • 5Burkart,M.,Gromb,D.,Panunzi,F..Agency Conflicts in Pub-lic and Negotiated Transfers of Corporate Control.Journal of Finance,2000,55(2):647-677.
  • 6Barclay,M.,C.G..Holderness,Private Benefits from Control of Public Corporations.Journal of Financial Economics,1989,25(2):371-395.
  • 7石水平.控制权转移、控股股东与大股东利益侵占──来自上市公司高管变更的经验证据[J].暨南学报(哲学社会科学版),2009,31(4):93-104. 被引量:9
  • 8Lehmann,E.,J.Weigand.Does the Governed Corporation Per-form Better?Governance Structure and Corporate Performance in Germany.European Finance Review,2000,4(2):157-195.
  • 9Johnson,S.,Rafael La Porta,Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes and Andrei Shleifer,Tunneling.American Economic Review,2000,90(2):22-27.
  • 10La Porta,R.,F.Lopez-De-Silanes,A.Shleifer.Corporate Owner-ship Around The World.Journal of Finance,1999,54(2):471-517.

二级参考文献46

共引文献227

同被引文献13

引证文献2

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部