4Chaoman K. The value of serial uhrasounds in the management of recurrent Uterine scar rupture [ J]. Br J Obstet Gynecol, 1994, 101 (6) :549-550.
5Sen S, Malik S, Salhan S. Ultrasonographic evaluation flower uterine segment thickness inpatients of previous cesarean section [ J ]. Gynecol Obstet ,2004,87 ( 3 ) :215-219.
6Hasbargen U, Margarita SM, Peter H, et al. Uterine dehiscence in a nullipara,diagnosed by MRI ,following use of unipolar elect rocautery during laparoscopic myomectomy : Case report[J]. Human Reproduction,2002,17 : 2180-2182.
7Pare E, Quinones JN, Macones GA, et al. Vaginal birth after cesarean section versus elective repeat cesarean section : assessment of maternal downstream health outcomes[ J ]. BJOG, 2006,113 : 75 -85.
9Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada. SOGC clinical practice guidelines. Guidelines for vaginal birth after previous caesarean birth. Number 155 ( Replaces guideline Number 147 ), February 2005 [ J ]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2005,89 ( 3 ) : 319-331.
10Adanu RM ,McCarthy MY. Vaginal birth after cesarean delivery in theWest African setting [ J ]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet, 2007,98 (3) : 2272-2311.
8Boutin A,Jastmw N ,Girard M, et al. Reliability of Two-dimensional- transvaginal Sonographic Measurement of Lower Uterinesegment Thick- ness Using Video Sequences[ J]. Am J Perinatol,2012 ,29 :527-532.
9Naji O, Daemen A, Smith A, et al. Changes in Cesarean Sectionscar Dimensions during Pregnancy : a Prospective Longitudinal Study [ J ]. Ultrasound Obstet Gyneeol,2013 ,41:556-562.
10Sen S, Malik S, Salhan S. Ultrasonographic Evaluation of Lower Uter- ine Segment Thickness in Patients of Previous Cesarean Section[ J]. Int J Gynaecol Obstet,2004,87:215-219.
