摘要
在中国政治学研究中,总结与反思频繁出现,反映出这一学科在发展进程中内含着张力。从反思的内容来看,学者们在中国政治学的历程、学术与实践的关系、本土化与国际化、科学化与规范性等重大问题上存在歧见与争论,形成了两种研究路向和学术流派。两种流派在关乎中国政治学的根本问题上常常针锋相对,却又渴望达成共识,使得中国政治学"焦灼中前行"。这种状况在中国政治学研究的人员构成、研究机构和学术期刊的结构中得到加强,在短时期内难以改变。
China's political studies witness regular summaries and reflections on the academic discipline,which is a manifestation of the internal tension in the discipline development.From the reflections it can be found that scholars have disputes and controversies on fundamental questions like history of the discipline,relationship between academics and practices,localization and internationalization,scientific orientations and norms,according to which two research approaches and schools have emerged.The schools attack each other in fundamental issues and are eager to reach agreement.This puts China's political studies "marching with anxiety".Such a situation would be intensified in the pattern of researchers and the structure of research institutes and academic journals,hardly possible to be changed in short term.
出处
《井冈山大学学报(社会科学版)》
2012年第2期71-81,共11页
Journal of Jinggangshan University(Social Sciences)
基金
国家社科基金项目"西方共和主义公共利益理论研究(项目编号:11CZZ006)"
关键词
研究反思
实践性
科学化
内在张力
research reflections
practice-utility
scientific orientation
internal tension