期刊文献+

北京市丰台区公众呼吸道传染病相关健康素养及行为调查 被引量:15

A survey on respiratory infectious diseases related health literacy and health behavior in Fengtai district , Beijing
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的评测北京市丰台区公众的呼吸道传染病相关健康素养,分析其影响因素,探索其与健康行为的关系。方法2011年6月在北京市丰台区采用多阶段抽样的方法确定1100名研究对象,对其采用自行设计的问卷进行调查,内容包括社会人口学特征、健康素养测评和健康行为测评3部分。应用SPSS13.0软件,对调查结果进行统计学描述,应用方差或协方差分析对健康素养的影响因素及其与健康行为的关系进行分析。结果收回有效问卷998份,有效应答率为90.7%。调查对象的年龄范围为15-65岁,其呼吸道传染病相关健康素养(以下简称健康素养)得分为(71,3±19.0)分。低(〈60分)、中(60-85分)、高健康素养者(〉85分)所占比例分别为25.7%(256/998)、43.2%(432/998)和31.1%(310/998)。户籍人口、非户籍人口的健康素养得分分别为(74.1±18.9)、(68.4±18.8)分,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。健康素养各题型正确率从高到低依次为视听(77.6%,4647/5988)、网络操作(75.2%,2251/2994)、阅读(74.6%,3724/4990)、识图(68.3%,4090/5988)、计算(65.5%,5230/7984)。经方差分析或协方差分析发现,不同年龄、民族、文化程度、职业、收入水平人群健康素养的差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01),不同性别、婚姻状况人群健康素养的差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。调查对象的呼吸道传染病相关健康行为得分为(69.7±15.5)分。低、中、高健康素养者行为得分依次升高,分别为(64.5.4-15.0)、(70.4±15.6)、(72.5±14.9)分,差异有统计学意义(P〈0.01)。结论北京市丰台区公众具备一定的呼吸道传染病相关健康素养,年龄、民族、文化程度、职业和收入是健康素养水平的影响因素,健康素养水平高的人群其健康行为水平也相应较高。 [ Abstract] Objective This study aims to survey respiratory infectious disease related health literacy (RIDHL) and health behavior (RIDHB) among residents in Fengtai district, Beijing, analyze impact factors of RIDHL , explore the association between RIDHL and RIDHB. Methods Multistage sampting was employed and 1100 respondents were surveyed by self-designed questionnaires, which including social-demographic characteristics and evaluation of RIDHL and RIDHB. The survey results were discribed , the impact factors of RIDHL and the association between RIDHL and RIDHB were analyzed by analysis of variance or covariance. Results A total of 998 qualified questionnaires were recollected with the effective rate of 90.7%. The respondents aged from 15 to 65, scored (71.3 ± 19. 0) points in RIDHL test. Of those respondents, 25.7% ( 256/998 ) , 43.2% (432/998) and 31.1% (310/998 ) were evaluated as low( 〈 60 points), medium (60 -85 points), and high level( 〉 85 points) of RIDHL, respectively. There were significant difference in RIDHL scores between registered and non-registered residents, who scored (74.1 ± 18.9) and (68.4 ± 18.8 ) points, respectively ( P 〈 0.01 ). RIDHL sections were ranked as audiovisual ( 77.6% , 4647/5988 ), internet using ( 75.2% , 2251/2994 ) , reading ( 74.6 % , 3724/4990 ) , map using (68.3% , 4090/5988) and quantitative(65.5% , 5230/7984) according to the accurate rates from high to low. Analysis of variance or covariance showed that RIDHL scores were significantly different among respondents with different ages, nationalities, educational levels, occupations, and incomes (P 〈 0.01 ) , yet no significant differences among those with different genders and marital status ( P 〉 0.05 ). Respondents scored (69.7 ± 15.5) points in RIDHB test. The RIDHB scores ( (64.5 ± 15.0), (70.4 ± 15.6), (72.5 ± 14.9)points, respectively)increased among residents with low, medium and high level of RIDHL ( P 〈 0. 01 ). Conclusion Residents in Fengtai district, Beijing possessed medium level of RIDHL. The non-registered residents showed lower RIDHL than registered residents. Ages, nationalities, educational levels, occupations, and incomes were impact factors of RIDHL. People with higher level of RIDHL also showed a higher level of RIDHB.
出处 《中华预防医学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期237-240,共4页 Chinese Journal of Preventive Medicine
基金 中美新发/再发传染病项目(5U2GGHH000018-02)
关键词 健康素养 传染病控制 健康行为 问卷调查 Health literacy Communicable disease control Health behavior Questionnaires
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

  • 1U.S.National Library of Medicine. Health literacy[EB/OL].http://www.nlm.nih.gov/medlineplus/healthliteracy.html,2011.
  • 2中华人民共和国卫生部.首次中国居民健康素养调查报告[R]北京:中华人民共和国卫生部,2009.
  • 3刘小娜,常春,孙昕霙,杜维婧,田振,张培培.呼吸道传染病健康素养测评工具的开发与评价[J].中国健康教育,2011,27(11):820-823. 被引量:7
  • 4Ad Hoc Committee on Health Literacy for the Council on Scientific Affairs,American Medical Association. Health literacy:Report of the Council on Scientific Affairs[J].Journal of the American Medical Association,1999,(06):552-557.
  • 5Miller DP Jr,Brownlee CD,McCoy TP. The effect of health literacy on knowledge and receipt of colorectal cancer screening:a survey study[J].BMC Family Practice,2007,(08):16.
  • 6Baker DW,Gazmararian JA,Williams MV. Functional health literacy and the risk of hospital admission among Medicare managed care enrollees[J].American Journal of Public Health,2002,(08):1278-1283.

二级参考文献12

  • 1张丽艳,乔磊,苏颖,杨学军,薛锦锋.北京市东城区预防呼吸道传染病宣传月效果评价[J].中国健康教育,2006,22(9):685-686. 被引量:2
  • 2卫生部妇幼保健与社区卫生司,中国健康教育中心/卫生部新闻宣传中心.首次中国居民健康素养调查报告[R].北京:卫生部,2009.
  • 3张敏强.教育测量学[M].北京:人民教育出版社,2002.137.
  • 4Spews C. Health literacy:concept analysis[ J]. Journal of Advanced Nursing,2005,50 ( 6 ) : 633 640.
  • 5McCormaek L, Bamn C, Squiers L, et al. Measuring health literacy : a pilot study of a new skills-based instrument [ J ]. Journal of Health Communication,2010,15 ( Suppl 2) : S51 S71.
  • 6Davis TC, Crouch MA, Long SW, et al. Rapid assessment of literacy levels of adult primary care patients[ J]. Family Medicine, 1991,23 (6) :433-435.
  • 7Paker RM, Baker DW, Williams MV, et al. The test of functional health literacy in aduhs:a new instrument for measuring patients' literacy skills [ J ]. Journal of General Internal Medieine, 1995,10 (10) :53 -541.
  • 8Sudore RI, Yaffe K, Satterfield S, et al. Limited literacy and mortality in the elderly : the health, aging, and body composition study [ J ]. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 2006, 21 ( 8 ) : 806 -812.
  • 9肖瓅,马昱,李英华,胡俊峰,程玉兰,陈国永,陶茂萱.中国城乡居民健康素养状况及影响因素研究[J].中国健康教育,2009,25(5):323-326. 被引量:235
  • 10王萍.国内外健康素养研究进展[J].中国健康教育,2010,26(4):298-302. 被引量:108

共引文献6

同被引文献177

引证文献15

二级引证文献94

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部