期刊文献+

经尿道反馈微波热疗在高危高龄良性前列腺增生患者中的应用 被引量:3

Application of the transurethral feedback microwave thermotherapy in the high-risk older patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究经尿道反馈式微波热疗(PLFT)治疗高危高龄良性前列腺增生症(BPH)患者的效果并探讨不良事件的发生。方法对68例高危BPH患者,采用PLFT个体化治疗方法,随访12个月。通过分析患者治疗基本参数、前列腺体积变化、IPSS、QOL、Qmax和残余尿来评价治疗效果。结果 68例患者中63例(92.6%)完成了随访,治疗前IPSS、QOL、Qmax和残余尿分别是(28.50±4.30)分、(5.25±0.72)分、(2.80±4.06)ml/s和(190.7±97.2)ml;PLFT治疗后12个月随访的IPSS、QOL、Qmax和残余尿分别是(11.20±3.50)、(1.40±1.30)、(14.60±2.80)ml/s和(34.6±21.2)ml。完成治疗的63例患者治疗前后上述指标差异有统计学意义。结论 PLFT治疗高危高龄BPH患者安全有效,可作为高危高龄BPH患者治疗的优先选择。 To study clinical efficacy and adverse events of the Transurethral Feedback Microwave Thermotherapy (PLFT) in the highrisk older patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). Methods A total of 68 highrisk older patients with BPH were included in this study. Patients were followed up for 12 months after PLFT treatment. The treatment outcome after 12 months was evaluated with the basic treatment parameter, changes of prostate volume, International Prostate Symptom Score (IPSS), quality of life question ( QOL), peak urinary flow rate (Qmax) and postvoid residual urine volume. Results 63 out of 68 patients (92.6%) completed the 12 months followup. The IPSS, QOL, Qmax and postvoid residual urine volume were (28.50 ±4.30) point, (5.25 ±0. 72 ) point, (2.80± 4.06) nd/s, ( 190.00 ± 97.20) ml pretreatment, respectively. The average values of the IPSS, QOL, Qmax and postvoid residual urine volume after PLFT treatment were ( 11.20 ±3.50), ( 1.40 ± 1.30), ( 14.60 ± 2.80) ml/s, ( 34.60 ± 21.20) ml at 12 months. Significant differences were found of these variables between the pretreatment and posttreatment, respectively. Conclusion The clinical outcome of 12 months after PLFT using the CoreTherm device is effective. The PLFT can be used to the high risk elder BPH patients.
出处 《宁夏医学杂志》 CAS 2012年第3期200-202,共3页 Ningxia Medical Journal
基金 宁夏自然科学基金资助项目(NZ07106)
关键词 高危良性前列腺增生 微波热疗 反馈式微波热疗 BPH Microwave thermotherapy PLFT
  • 相关文献

参考文献9

  • 1洪宝发,符伟军,蔡伟,杨勇,陈耀富,展洁,张翠娥.经尿道选择性绿激光前列腺汽化术治疗高龄高危良性前列腺增生[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(1):43-45. 被引量:128
  • 2AUA Practice Guidelines Committee. AUA guidelines on manage- merit of benign prostatic hyperplasia(2003 ) [ J]. J Urol,2003,170 : 530 - 547.
  • 3Eisenberg ER, Badlani GH. Long - term treatment outcomes of core therm microwave feedback thermotherapy[ J]. Curt" Urol Rep,2004, 5:287 - 294.
  • 4Huidobro C, Bolmsj M, Larson T,et al. Evaluation of microwave thermotherapy with histopathology, magnetic resonance imaging and temperature mapping [ J ~. Urol,2004,171:672 - 678.
  • 5De La Rosette JJ,Laguna MP, Gravas S, et al. Transurethral micro- wave thermotherapy:the gold standard for minimally invasive thera- pies for patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia [ J ]. Endourol 2003,17:245 - 251.
  • 6Wagrell L, Schelin S, Nordling J, et al. Three - year follow - up of feedback microwave thermotherapy versus TURP for clinical BPH : a prospective randomized muhicenter study [ J ]. Urology, 2004,64 : 699 - 702.
  • 7高平生,魏希锋,陈世昌,李海涛,屈明伟,王自军.微波热疗中细胞杀死量与前列腺体积变化的关系[J].现代泌尿外科杂志,2010,15(6):447-450. 被引量:6
  • 8Schelin S, Geertsen U, Walter S, et al. Feedback microwave ther- motherapy versus TURP/prostate enucleation surgery in patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia and persistent urinary retention : a prospective, randomized, controlled, muhicenter study [ J ]. Urolo- gy,2006,68 (4) :795 -799.
  • 9Mattiasson A, Wagrell L, Schelin S, et al. Five - year follow - up of feedback microwave thermotherapy versus TURP for clinical BPH : a prospective randomized multicenter study [ J ]. Urology, 2007,69( 1 ) :91 -96.

二级参考文献22

  • 1洪宝发,蔡伟,符伟军,杨勇,王威,陈耀富,展洁,张翠娥,李炎唐,崔胜堂.选择性绿激光汽化术治疗良性前列腺增生的临床研究[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2005,26(1):17-19. 被引量:90
  • 2Uchida T,Ohori M,Soh S,et al.Factors influencing morbidity in patients undergoing transurethral resection of the prostate.Urology,1999 ,53:98-105.
  • 3Anson K.Could the latest generation potassium titanyl phosphate lasers be the ones to make transurethral resection of the prostate an operation of historical interest only? Curr Opin Urol,2004,14:27-29.
  • 4Shingleton WB,Terrell F,Renfroe L,et al.Low-power vs high-power KTP laser:improved method of laser ablation of prostate.J Endourol,1999,13:49-52.
  • 5Hai MA,Malek RS.Photoselective vaporization of the prostate :initial experience with a new 80 W KTP laser for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia.J Endourol,2003 ,17 :93-96.
  • 6Reich O,Bachmann A,Schneede P,et al.Experimental comparison of high power (80 W) potassium titanyl phosphate laser vaporization and transurethral resection of the prostate.J Urol,2004,171 (6 Pt1) :2502-2504.
  • 7Malek RS,Kuntzman RS,Barrett DM.High power potassium-titanyl-phosphate laser vaporization prostatectomy.J Urol,2000,163:1730-1733.
  • 8Te AE,Malloy TR,Stein BS,et al.Photoselective vaporization of the prostate for the treatment of benign prostatic hyperplasia:12-month results from the first United States multicenter prospective trial.J Urol,2004,172(4 Pt 1) :1404-1408.
  • 9Larson TR.Current treatment options for benign prostatic hyperplasia and their impact on sexual function.Urology ,2003,61:692-698.
  • 10Wada S,Yoshimura R,Kyo M,et al.Comparative study of tran.surethral laser prostatectomy versus transurethral electroresection for benign prostatic hyperplasia.Int J Urol,2000 ,7 :373-377.

共引文献132

同被引文献46

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部