摘要
金融犯罪中,有一些典型的罪数问题容易混淆。盗窃信用卡并使用属于想象竞合而不是法条竞合。伪造并出售该伪造的货币,成立吸收犯而非牵连犯。伪造有价证券等并将其用于诈骗的,成立牵连犯而非吸收犯,更不是结合犯。本文分析了金融犯罪中若干典型的罪数问题,并就想象竞合与法条竞合、牵连犯与吸收犯、结合犯之间的区别进行了理论探讨,对结合犯的认定提出了自己的观点。
On financial-crime,something in the quan- tity of crime is confused. Stealing credit card and us- ing it is not a coinciding-two-articles crime but a imaginative coincidental offence. Forge and sell the counterfeit currency constitute not implicated offence but absorbable offence o Forged negotiable securities and using it in defrauding is nether absorbable offence nor combinative crime but implicated offence. This pa- per analyzed some typical problem in quantity in fi nancial-crime ,and discussed the distinguish in theory between imaginative coincidental offence, coinciding- two -articles crime,implicated offence,absorbed of- fence and combinative crime, and state my view on combinative crime.
出处
《特区经济》
2012年第3期270-272,共3页
Special Zone Economy
基金
湖南省哲学社会科学基金项目"罪数理论研究"(项目编号:2010YBB330)的阶段性研究成果
关键词
金融犯罪
罪数
法条竞合
牵连犯
结合犯
financial crime
the quantity of crime
acoinciding-two-articles crime
implicated offence
com-binative crime