摘要
《中华人民共和国担保法》第28条实际上确立了一个"物的担保范围内保证责任绝对豁免原则",该条所确立的法律原则与《担保法》的立法精神实际形成了尖锐的矛盾冲突。最高人民法院关于《担保法》的司法解释第38条对该条的适用进行了初步限制,但还不尽完善。《中华人民共和国物权法》做出了与《担保法》第28条明显不同的规定,限制了该条的适用,更好地保护了债权人的合法权益。
The article 28 of the Guarantee Law of the People' s Republic of China in tact establishes responsibility to ensure that a range of property for the security principle of absolute immunity, the legal principles establish in that section and the legislative spirit of the security law the actual formation of a sharp conflicts. The Supreme People' s Court judicial interpretation of Article 38 on security application of the article conducted a preliminary restriction, but not perfect. Property Law of the People' s Republic of China has made a significantly different provisions from section 28 of the security law, limiting the application of the article, and better protect the legitimate rights and interests of the creditors.
出处
《河南司法警官职业学院学报》
2012年第1期81-83,共3页
Journal of Henan Judicial Police Vocational College
关键词
担保
保证豁免原则
废除
security
ensure the principle of immunity
repeal