期刊文献+

安注方式对设计基准失水事故下元件包壳破损份额影响的分析 被引量:4

Analysis of Safety Injection Manner Influence on Cladding Failure Fraction in Design Basis Loss of Coolant Accident
下载PDF
导出
摘要 以某船用压水堆为研究对象,采用RELAP5/MOD3.2程序,分析了发生在主管道冷端的极限中破口失水事故中,采取冷端、热端安注方式时不同的事故过程。引入临界管概念,确定了包壳破损临界功率因子。对全堆进行精细功率重构,确定每根燃料元件功率因子,最终确定不同安注方式下的元件包壳破损份额,并指出:对破口出现在主管道冷段的设计基准事故,热端安注能减轻事故后果,减少破损份额。 Extreme middle break loss of coolant accident (MBLOCA) occurring at cold leg was analyzed with the RELAP5/MOD3.2 code for a marine reactor, and different accident processes were simulated separately under the conditions of cold leg safety injection and hot leg safety injection. Based on the concept of critical pipe which was introduced in this paper, the critical power factor of fuel cladding failure was given, and then pin power distribution of the whole core was calculated subsequently. Finally, the cladding failure fraction of the xeactor was got. It is pointed that, during the design basis LOCA occurring at cold leg of the main loop, hot leg safety injection can reduce the accident results and the failure fraction.
出处 《原子能科学技术》 EI CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期336-340,共5页 Atomic Energy Science and Technology
基金 国家自然科学基金资助项目(11075212) 海军工程大学博士研究生创新基金资助项目
关键词 船用压水堆 MBLOCA 安注方式 包壳破损 marine reactor MBLOCA safety injection manner cladding failure
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

二级参考文献15

  • 1NEA. Insights into the control of the release of iodine, cesium, strontium and other fission products in the containment by severe accident management, NEA/CSNI/R(2000) 9[R]. Le Seine, France: OECD Nuclear Energy Agency, 2000.
  • 2DINUNNO J J, ANDERSON F D, BAKER R E, et al. Calculation of distance factors for power and test reactor sites, TID-14844[R]. Washington, USA: U.S. Atomic Energy Commission, 1962.
  • 3NRC. Control room habitability at linght water nuclear power reactors, RG 1. 196[R]. Washington, USA: U.S. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 2003.
  • 4CROFF A G. A user's manual for the ORIGEN2 computer code, ORNL/TM-7175 [R ]. Oak Ridge, USA: Oak Ridge National Laboratory, 1980.
  • 5Jae-Jun JEONG; Suk Ku SIM, Sang Yong LEE. Development and Assessment of the COBRA/RELAP5 Code [J]. Journal of Nuclear Science and Technology, 1997, 34 (11): 1087-1098.
  • 6Smith K A, Baratta A J, Robinson G E. Coupled RELAP5 and CONTAIN Accident Analysis Using PVM [J]. Nuclear Safety, 1995, 36(1): 94-108.
  • 7Anis Bousbia Salah, Giorgio M. Galassi, Francesco D'Auria et al. Assessment study of the Coupled Code RELAP5/PARCS Against the Peach Bottom BWR Turbine Trip Test [J]. Nuclear Engineering and Design, 2005, 235:1727-1736.
  • 8Carlson K E. RELAP5/MOD3.3 Code Manual Volume Ⅷ: Programmers Manual[R]. NUREG/CR-5535, 2001.
  • 9Geist A, Beguelin A, Dongarra J, et al. PVM 3 User's Guide and Reference Manual[R]. ORNL/TM-12187, 1994.
  • 10Yang W S,Nucl Sci Eng,1992年,111期,21页

共引文献29

同被引文献13

  • 1胡二邦,王寒,张永义,闫江雨,李正德,辛存田.滨海复杂地形核电厂址高斯烟羽模式有效性检验[J].辐射防护,2004,24(5):289-296. 被引量:6
  • 2朱继洲.核反应堆安全分析[M].北京:原子能出版社,2008.
  • 3Cladding swelling and rupture models for LOCA analysis, NUREG-0630[R]. Washington D. C., US.. Nuclear Regulatory Commission, 1980.
  • 4Accident source terms for light-water nuclear power plants, NUREG-1465[R]. US: Nuclear Regulatory Commission, Office of Nuclear Regu- latory Research, 1995.
  • 5Fuel cladding failure criteria, EUR 19256 EN [R]. Belgium: European Commission, 1999.
  • 6Determination of the in containment source term for a large-break loss of coolant accident,EUR19841 EN[R]. [S. l.]: [s. n.], 2001.
  • 7朱继洲.核反应堆安全分析[M]西安:西安交通大学出版社;北京:原子能出版社,2004.
  • 8DINUNNO J J,ANDERSON F D,BAKER R E. Calculation of distance factors for power and test reactor sites,TID-14844[R].US:NRC,1962.
  • 9NRC. Alternative radiological source terms for evaluating design basis accidents at nuclear power reactors,Regulatory Guide 1.183[M].US:NRC,2000.
  • 10王卫国,蒋维楣,余兴.深圳地区海岸复杂地形下大气输送与扩散模拟[J].环境科学学报,1998,18(1):45-50. 被引量:5

引证文献4

二级引证文献5

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部