期刊文献+

综合医院就诊者中焦虑障碍的检出率 被引量:40

Prevalence of anxiety disorders among outpatients in general hospitals
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的:了解综合性医疗机构中门诊就诊者焦虑障碍的检出率及其分布特点,为提高临床诊疗中以人为整体的诊治理念,强化非精神专科诊疗中对焦虑障碍的识别和治疗提供依据。方法:多中心横断面设计,以分别代表中国北部、东部、南部、西部和中部的5个城市(北京、上海、广州、成都和长沙),每个城市各3家,共15家三级甲等综合医院的心血管科、消化科、神经科和妇科的门诊为研究点。有8487例综合医院门诊就诊者完成调查。采用医院焦虑抑郁量表(HADS)筛查,同时完成Sheehan失能量表(SDS),记录主诉和就诊医生的诊疗意见。筛查≥8分的阳性者用简明国际神经精神访谈(MINI)作诊断评估,按DSM-IV标准做出各种焦虑障碍的诊断。诊断阳性者做抑郁自评量表(QIDS-SR16)和焦虑自评量表(SAS)评估症状严重程度。结果:经失访校正后,MINI诊断的焦虑障碍的检出率8.6%,抑郁和焦虑共病的检出率4.1%;亚型中以广泛性焦虑障碍检出率最高(4.2%)。焦虑障碍和抑郁障碍之间的共病比例(49.4%)以及焦虑障碍亚型间共病比例(56.0%)较高。有共病者的SAS和QIDS-SR16评分均高于单一焦虑诊断者(P<0.001),且SDS的3个条目分均高于单一焦虑诊断者(均P<0.05)。神经内科的焦虑障碍检出率最高(11.7%),其次是消化内科(9.4%)和心血管内科(7.8%),妇科最低(5.4%)。女性焦虑障碍的现患和终身检出率均高于男性。结论:焦虑障碍是综合医院就诊者中的常见问题,各种焦虑障碍亚型之间,以及焦虑与抑郁障碍的共病非常普遍且共病者病情更重。 Objectives: To explore the prevalence and distribution of anxiety disorders among outpatients in general hospitals. Methods: A multi-centered, hospital-based cross-sectional study was conducted in 15 tertiary gen- eral hospitals in 5 cities. A total of 8487 subjects were screened with the Hospital Anxiety Depression Scale (HAl)S), Sheehan Disability Scale (SDS), and the medical history review list. They were followed by regular clini- cal visit process. Physicians diagnoses and management was recorded. The Mini International Neuropsychaltric In- terview (MINI) were evaluated by psychiatrists afterwards for subjects scored ≥8 on HADS, and diagnoses of anx- iety disorders were made according to DSM-IV criteria. The self-rating of QIDS-SR16 and Zung's Self-rating Anxi- ety Scale (SAS) were followed by those diagnosed positive on depression or anxiety disorder. Results: The adjusted point prevalence of MINI-diagnosed anxiety disorders, and comorbid depression and anxiety were 8.6% and 4. 1%, respectively. The general anxiety disorder (GAD) was the most common (4. 2% ) among anxiety disorder spectrum. The proportion of comorbidity among anxiety disorders was high, 49. 4% with depression and 56. 0% with two or more anxiety disorders. Subjects on comorbid condition either with depression or with anxiety disorders had higher scores in QIDS-SR16 [(16. 7 +6.5) vs. (11.3 ±5.8), P 〈0.001], SAS [(42.2 ±9. 3) vs. (36.7 ± 8.4), P 〈0. 001], and in each of the three items of SDS [(5.30 ± 3.08) vs. (4. 52 ± 3.26), (4. 37 ± 3.76) vs. (3.53 ±3.63), (4.03 ±3, 50) vs. (2. 88 ±3.26), P 〈0. 05] comparing to those without comorbidity. The preva- lence of anxiety disorders was different across departments with statistical significance. Neurology (11.7%) was the highest, and gynecology (5.4%) was the lowest. Females had higher current and lifetime prevalence (9. 1% and 10. 0% ) than males (7.7% and 8. 2%, P 〈 0. 05). Conclusion: In this study, high prevalence of anxiety disor- der and comorbidity have been found among outpatients presented in general hospitals for physical problems. Those with comorbid conditions are severe on svmntoms and functionality.
出处 《中国心理卫生杂志》 CSSCI CSCD 北大核心 2012年第3期165-170,共6页 Chinese Mental Health Journal
关键词 焦虑障碍 检出率 综合性医院 门诊就诊者 简明国际神经精神访谈 anxiety disorders prevalence general hospital outpatients Mini International Neuropsychi-attic Interview
  • 相关文献

参考文献25

  • 1Devane CL,Chiao E,Franklin M,et al.Anxiety disorders in the 21st century: status,challenges,opportunities,and comorbidity with depression[J]. Am J Managed Care,2005,11(Suppl):344-353.
  • 2付朝伟,徐飚,詹思延,栾荣生,陈维清.中国四城市综合医院神经内科患者抑郁、焦虑现况研究[J].中华流行病学杂志,2006,27(9):803-807. 被引量:76
  • 3Arikian SR,Gorman JM.A Review of the Diagnosis,Pharmacologic Treatment,and Economic Aspects of Anxiety Disorders[J]. Prim Care Companion J Clin Psychiatry,2001,3(3):110-117.
  • 4沈渔邨.精神病学[M].5版.北京:人民卫生出版社,2009:467-468.
  • 5Sheehan DV,Lecrubier Y,Harnett-Sheehan K,et al.The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (M.I.N.I.): The Development and Validation of a Structured Diagnostic Psychiatric Interview[J]. J.Clin Psychiatry,1998,59(suppl 20):22-33.
  • 6Lecrubier Y,Sheehan DV,Weiller E,et al.The Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI).A short diagnostic structured interview: reliability and validity according to the CIDI[J]. Eur Psychiatry,1997,12(5): 224-231.
  • 7Sheehan DV,Lecrubier Y,Harnett-Sheehan K,et al.The validity of the Mini International Neuropsychiatric Interview (MINI) according to the SCID-P and its reliability[J]. European Psychiatry,1997,12(5):232-241.
  • 8司天梅,舒良,党卫民,苏允爱,陈景旭,董问天,孔庆梅,张卫华.简明国际神经精神访谈中文版的临床信效度[J].中国心理卫生杂志,2009,23(7):493-497. 被引量:226
  • 9何燕玲,马弘,张岚,刘哲宁,贾福军,张明园.综合医院就诊者中抑郁焦虑障碍的患病率调查[J].中华内科杂志,2009,48(9):748-751. 被引量:82
  • 10Sheehan DV,Harnett-Sheehan K,Raj BA.The measurement of disability[J]. Int Clin Psychopharmacol,1996,11(suppl 3):89-96.

二级参考文献85

共引文献742

同被引文献468

引证文献40

二级引证文献780

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部