期刊文献+

医学考试中多项选择题设计的可猜测性分析及改进措施 被引量:3

Predictability analysis and improvement suggestion of multiple-choice question design in medical examination
下载PDF
导出
摘要 多选项选择题(Multiple-choice question,MCQ)是当今各种医学考试的主流设置题型,具有便于组织实施,考核结果易于分析的优点,同时存在可猜测性缺陷。设计不合理的选择题可猜测性增加,导致考核效度下降。现就常见引起可猜测性升高的原因举例分析,并推荐了可行的解决方案。 Multiple-choice question (MCQ) is the mostly applied form of tests in medical examinations recently, which has the character of easy to organize, and the test results are convenient to analyze, but there is defect of predictability. Inappropriately designed MCQ has greater predictability leading to the decrease of test validity. This paper presents some examples of MCQ revealing the causes of there elevated predictability, and proposes some applicable improvement suggestions.
机构地区 江苏省中医院
出处 《中国高等医学教育》 2012年第3期59-60,共2页 China Higher Medical Education
关键词 多选项选择题 可猜测性 multiple-choice question predictability medical examination
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献9

  • 1张梅青.医学多选题考试试题质量控制的研究[J].中国考试,2005(7):30-33. 被引量:4
  • 2席峥,郑耀光,柳雯,轩海华.从执业医师考试看医学教育改革[J].中华医学教育杂志,2007,27(1):125-126. 被引量:25
  • 3黄素华.多项选择题出题技巧及应用[M].上海外语教育出版社,1998.177-178.
  • 4Core committee, institute for international medical education. Global minimum essential requirements in medical education[J]. Med Teach. 2002,24(2) : 130-5.
  • 5Massagli TL,Carline JD. Reliability of a 360-degree evaluation to assess resident competence[J]. Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 2007,86 (10) :845-52.
  • 6Berk RA.. A Guide to Criterion-referenced Test Construction[M]. Baltimore: Johns Hopkins University Press, 1984. 227.
  • 7张厚粲,黎坚.心理测量与评估[M].北京:北京师范大学出版社,2006;87-96.
  • 8卫生部国家医学考试中心.医师资格考试命审题手册[M].2000,31-92.
  • 9张鸣,温吉元.我国医师资格考试制度的建立与完善[J].中华医院管理杂志,2001,17(8):453-455. 被引量:31

共引文献12

同被引文献34

  • 1高惠霞,杨君.美国医师执照考试制度对我国医师准入制度的启示[J].中国医学伦理学,2006,19(4):84-85. 被引量:16
  • 2教育部.国家中长期教育改革和发展规划纲要(2010-2020年)[EB/OL].教育部门户网站,2010-2-28.
  • 3梅人朗 陈刚 杨益.医学教育全球标准[M].上海:上海科学技术出版社,2004..
  • 4Bakhsh TM,Sibiany AM,Al-Mashat FM,Meccawy AA,Al-Thubaity FK.Comparison of students' performance in the traditional oral clinical examination and the objective structured clinical examination[J].Saudi Med J.2009,30:555-7.
  • 5Mangold KA,Jeffers JM,Burns RA,et al.An Objective Structured Clinical Examination to Improve Formative Assessment for Senior Pediatrics Residents[J].J Grad Med Educ;DOI:10.4300/JGME-D-14-00777.1,2015,7(3):470-474.
  • 6Bloom-Feshbach K,Casey D,Schulson L,et al.Health Literacy in Transitions of Care:An Innovative Objective Structured Clinical Examination for Fourth-Year Medical Students in an Internship Preparation Course[J].J Gen Intern Med;DOI:10.1007/s11606-015-3513-1,2015,31(2):242-246.
  • 7McEvoy M,Schlair S,Sidlo Z,et al.Assessing third-year medical students’ability to address a patient’s spiritual distress using an OSCE case[J].Acad Med;DOI:10.1097/ACM.0000000000000061,2014,89(1):66-70.
  • 8Bosse HM,Nickel M,Huwendiek S,et al.Cost-effectiveness of peer role play and standardized patients in undergraduate communication training[J].BMC Med Educ;DOI:10.1186/1472-6920-13-102,2015,24;15(1):183.
  • 9Roghieh N,Fateme H,Hamid S,et al.The effect of formative evaluation using“direct observation of procedural skills”(DOPS)method on the extent of learning practical skills among nursing students in the ICU[J].Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res,2013,18(4):290-293.
  • 10Hoseini BL,Mazloum SR,Jafarnejad F,et al.Comparison of midwifery students’satisfaction with direct observation of procedural skills and current methods in evaluation of procedural skills in Mashhad Nursing and Midwifery School[J].Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res,2013,18(2):94-100.

引证文献3

二级引证文献11

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部