期刊文献+

诸葛亮北伐目的新论——以多重战略目的及其实现程度为中心 被引量:3

A New Discussion on the Northern Expeditions of Zhuge Liang
下载PDF
导出
摘要 在"隆中对"中,诸葛亮已经提出刘备跨有荆益后北伐的目的是"成霸业"、"兴汉室"。后来法正建议刘备北伐汉中时提到了包括"尊奖王室"、"蚕食雍、凉"在内的三重目的,这对诸葛亮应会有影响。诸葛亮秉政期间北伐的目的应有三大层次:兴复汉室、推进统一为第一层次;扩大占领区、联络氐羌、搜罗人才、疲敝魏国等为第二层次;以弱示强、以攻为守、凝聚内部等为第三层次。就北伐的成效看,第一层次的目的远未实现,第二层次的目的或多或少有所实现,第三层次的目的大致实现。诸葛亮的北伐就目的来说,与孙权的北伐有明显区别;就后果而言,与姜维的北伐也有重要差异。 In Longzhong strategic discussions, Zhuge Liang suggested the objectives of the northern expedition of Liu Bei would be "the rise of the hegemony" and "the renaissance of the Han dynasty" after he occupied Jingzhou and Yizhou. Later, when he suggested that Liu Bei should launch the northern expedition to Hanzhong, Fa Zheng mentioned the triple objectives of the expedition, "respecting the emperor" and "encroaching on Yongzhou and Liangzhou" included, which might have influenced Zhuge Liang. When he monopolized the power of the Shu Kingdom, the objectives of the northern expeditions of Zhuge Liang could be divided into three classes: the renaissance of the Han Dynasty and promoting the unification of China; expanding the occupied areas, establishing contact with Di and Qiang, scouting for talents, and exhausting the Wei Kingdom; defending by attacking and increasing internal cohesion. As to the results of the northern expeditions, the first class objectives were far from being achieved, the second class objectives were partly achieved, and the third class objectives basically achieved. The objectives of Zhuge Liang were markedly different from those of Sun Quan, and the results were markedly different from those of Jiang Wei.
作者 林榕杰
出处 《东方论坛(青岛大学学报)》 2012年第1期114-120,共7页 Eastern Forum(JOURNAL OF QINGDAO UNIVERSITY)
基金 2011年福建省社会科学规划项目<儒道思想双重转型研究--以魏晋时期为中心> 本人为项目主持人
关键词 诸葛亮 刘备 孙权 蜀汉 魏国 北伐 Zhuge Liang Liu Bei Sun Quan the Shu Kingdom the Wei Kingdom the Northern Expedition
  • 相关文献

参考文献7

  • 1陈寿.三国志[M].北京:中华书局,1982..
  • 2赵昆生.蜀汉政治新论[J].许昌学院学报,1992(2X):12-16. 被引量:1
  • 3《三国志》卷二六《牵招传》,第732页.
  • 4朱大渭、梁满仓.《诸葛亮大传》,北京:中华书局2007年版,第612页.
  • 5《三国志》卷六四《诸葛恪传》.
  • 6《三国志》卷三五《诸葛亮传》.
  • 7岳玉玺.评诸葛亮北伐的战略错误[J].聊城大学学报(社会科学版),1992(4):35-41. 被引量:1

共引文献458

同被引文献20

  • 1达世亮,达世新.“苏伊士运河是我们的!”——1956年纳赛尔的冒险之举[J].航海,1997,0(6):30-32. 被引量:1
  • 2王国民.浅论蜀汉政治目标对社会经济的影响[J].周口师范学院学报,2006,23(4):44-46. 被引量:1
  • 3张大可.论诸葛亮[J].社会科学(甘肃),1986(1):92-99. 被引量:1
  • 4(美)肯尼思·华尔兹(KennethN.Waltz)著,信强.国际政治理论[M]上海人民出版社,2003.
  • 5李兆成.诸葛亮形象的道家化及其影响[J].成都大学学报(社会科学版),2007(6):85-93. 被引量:6
  • 6Andrew Mack.Why Big Nations Lose Small Wars: The Politics of Asymmetric Conflict. World Politics . 1975
  • 7欧曼.收复苏伊士运河前前后后——埃及前经济财政部长谈内幕[J].阿拉伯世界.1986(03)
  • 8Michael P. Fischerkeller.David versus Goliath: Cultural judgments in asymmetric wars[J].Security Studies.1998(4)
  • 9Kenneth W. Thompson.Peace and War Raymond Aron, Peace and War: A Theory of International Relations . Translated from the French by Richard Howard and Annette Baker Fox. (Garden City: Doubleday & Company, Inc., 1966. Pp. xviii, 820. $10.00.)[].The Review of Politics.1968
  • 10Jeffrey Record.Beating Goliath: Why Insurgents Win (and Lose). http://www.au.af.mil/au/awc/awcgate/awc/beating_goliath.pdf . 2007

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部