摘要
法学界,既判力、一事不再理和禁止双重危险的界定一向不尽清晰,在理论与实践中均造成了一定的混乱。既判力的基本目的乃是确保实体判决之确定性和终局性,禁止法院就既决事项进行相互矛盾的实体审判,具有实体法的效果,客观上产生一事不再理的效果;一事不再理仅具有程序性效力,约束就同一诉讼标的再行起诉或审理;禁止双重危险主要是保护人民的权利,间接达到确保判决终局性的目的,不以实体判决为前提,且具有争点效。三者有很大不同,不能相互替代、混同使用。
In legal circles,adjudged force and non bis in idem ond prohibition of double jeopa^ly is not the clear,in judicial prac- tice has caused some confusion.The basic purpose of adjudged force but to ensure that the entity of certainty and finality of the judgment,adjudged force prohibited the court conflicting entity trial,with the effect of substantive law,bis in idem effect of an ob- jective;Things are no longer only reason the effectiveness of the procedural constraints on the same subject matter of litigation fiar- ther. prosecution or proceedings;prohibition of double jeopardy protection of the rights of the people,and indirectly to achieve the purpose of ensuring the finality of the Judgment,not physical judgment,and has a point of contention effect.This three are very dif- ferent,so can not substitute and confused with each other.
出处
《行政与法》
2012年第3期80-84,共5页
Administration and Law
关键词
既判力
一事不再理
禁止双重危险
辨析
adjudged force
bis in idem
prohibition of double jeopardy
discrimination