摘要
在由河北大学校园车祸所引发的"李启铭案"中,肇事人李启铭的一句"我爸是李刚"深深地触动着整个中国社会的神经。经河北省望都县人民法院审理,此案已作出一审判决,伴随刑法学界的支持声音,该判决给人以一个"公正判决"印象。但是,通过对整个案件过程的梳理,在对可能适用的罪名相关理论进行对比及其具体适用的再思考后,结合在审判过程出现的李刚央视大哭、叛三缓三的网上传言和"自我审查"的影响等事件,对"李启铭案"给出了另一种解读。
The ＂LI Qiming case＂ was caused by a traffic accident in Hebei University. The wrecker Li Qiming said ＂My father is Li Gang＂, which deeply hurt the whole Chinese society＇ s nerve. Through the trial of the People＇ s Court in Wangdu County, Hebei province, the decision made the consequence clear. To be accompanied by the criminal law professional circle＇ s applause for the jud- ges＇ decision, this was regarded as a ＂fair judgment＂. However, through examining the whole case, after comparing with related criminal law theory and giving the thought of its application, a new inter- pretation viewpoint can be found. Along with the Li Gang＇ s crying in CCTV, the rumors online of three-year sentence, suspended for three years, and the effects of self censorship, this paper gave an- other interpretation on ＂LI Qiming Case＂.
出处
《重庆理工大学学报（社会科学）》
CAS
2012年第3期70-75,共6页
Journal of Chongqing University of Technology（Social Science）
基金
上海交通大学研究创新能力培养专项基金(Z-190-002)资助
关键词
李启铭案
醉酒驾车
言论“沉寂化”
自我审查
李刚
LI Qiming case
drunken driving
＂silencing dynamic＂ of speech
self censorship
LI Gang
