期刊文献+

Seismic retrofitting of reinforced concrete frame structures using GFRP-tube-confined-concrete composite braces 被引量:1

Seismic retrofitting of reinforced concrete frame structures using GFRP-tube-confined-concrete composite braces
下载PDF
导出
摘要 This paper presents a new type of structural bracing intended for seismic retrofitting use in framed structures. This special composite brace, termed glass-fiber-reinforced-polymer (GFRP)-tube-confined-concrete composite brace, is comprised of concrete confined by a GFRP tube and an inner steel core for energy dissipation. Together with a contribution from the GFRP-tube confined concrete, the composite brace shows a substantially increased stiffness to control story drift, which is often a preferred feature in seismic retrofitting. An analysis model is established and implemented in a general finite element analysis program - OpenSees, for simulating the load-displacement behavior of the composite brace. Using this model, a parametric study of the hysteretic behavior (energy dissipation, stiffness, ductility and strength) of the composite brace was conducted under static cyclic loading and it was found that the area ratio of steel core to concrete has the greatest influence among all the parameters considered. To demonstrate the application of the composite brace in seismic retrofitting, a three-story nonductile reinforced concrete (RC) frame structure was retrofitted with the composite braces. Pushover analysis and nonlinear time-history analyses of the retrofitted RC frame structure was performed by employing a suite of 20 strong ground motion earthquake records. The analysis results show that the composite braces can effectively reduce the peak seismic responses of the RC frame structure without significantly increasing the base shear demand. This paper presents a new type of structural bracing intended for seismic retrofitting use in framed structures. This special composite brace, termed glass-fiber-reinforced-polymer (GFRP)-tube-confined-concrete composite brace, is comprised of concrete confined by a GFRP tube and an inner steel core for energy dissipation. Together with a contribution from the GFRP-tube confined concrete, the composite brace shows a substantially increased stiffness to control story drift, which is often a preferred feature in seismic retrofitting. An analysis model is established and implemented in a general finite element analysis program - OpenSees, for simulating the load-displacement behavior of the composite brace. Using this model, a parametric study of the hysteretic behavior (energy dissipation, stiffness, ductility and strength) of the composite brace was conducted under static cyclic loading and it was found that the area ratio of steel core to concrete has the greatest influence among all the parameters considered. To demonstrate the application of the composite brace in seismic retrofitting, a three-story nonductile reinforced concrete (RC) frame structure was retrofitted with the composite braces. Pushover analysis and nonlinear time-history analyses of the retrofitted RC frame structure was performed by employing a suite of 20 strong ground motion earthquake records. The analysis results show that the composite braces can effectively reduce the peak seismic responses of the RC frame structure without significantly increasing the base shear demand.
出处 《Earthquake Engineering and Engineering Vibration》 SCIE EI CSCD 2012年第1期91-105,共15页 地震工程与工程振动(英文刊)
关键词 BRACE composite confined concrete glass-fiber-reinforced polymer frame nonlinear analysis RETROFIT seismic brace composite confined concrete glass-fiber-reinforced polymer frame nonlinear analysis retrofit seismic
  • 相关文献

参考文献32

  • 1Anagnos T,Comerio MC,Goulet C,Na H,Steele J and Stewart JP(2008),"Los Angeles Inventory of Nonductile Concrete Buildings for Analysis of Seismic Collapse Risk Hazards," Proc.14th World Conf.Earthquake Engrg.,Beijing,China,October 12-17,2008.
  • 2Binici,B and Mosalam KM(2007),"Analysis of Reinforced Concrete Columns Retrofitted with Fiber Reinforced Polymer Lamina," Composites:Part B,38: 265-276.
  • 3Chang GA and Mander GB(1994),"Seismic Energy Based Fatigue Damage Analysis of Bridge Columns: PartⅠ- Evaluation of Seismic Capacity," Technical Report NCEER-94-0006.
  • 4D'Aniello,M.,Corte,GD and Mazzolani FM(2009), "All-steel Buckling-restrained Braces for Seismic Upgrading of Existing Reinforced Concrete Buildings," Proc.STESSA 2009,Behaviour of Steel Structures in Seismic Areas(Edited by Richard Sause,Federico M. Mazzolani,and James M.Ricles),CRC Press 2009.
  • 5Di Sarno,L and Manfred G(2010),"Seismic Retrofitting with Buckling Restrained Braces:Application to an Existing Non-ductile RC Framed Building," Soil Dynamics and Earthquake Engineering,30(11):1279- 1297.
  • 6Fam AZ and Rizkalla SH(2001),"Behavior of Axially Loaded Concrete-filled Circular Fiber-reinforced Polymer Tubes," ACI Struct.J,98(3):280-289.
  • 7Gardone D,Dolce M,Ponzo FC and Coelho E(2004), "Experimental Behaviour of R/C Frames Retrofitted with Dissipating and Re-centering Braces," Journal of Earthquake Engineering,8(3):361-396.
  • 8Ghobarah A and Elfath AH(2001),"Rehabilitation of a Reinforced Concrete Frame Using Eccentric Steel Bracing," Engineering Structures,23:745-755.
  • 9Goel S and Lee H(1990),"Seismic Strengthening of RC Structures by Ductile Steel Bracing System," Proc.4th USNCEE,Palm Springs,CA,Vol.3,May 1990.
  • 10Harries K,J Ricles Sause R,Pessiki S and Walkup L (1998)."Seismic Retrofit of Non-Ductile Reinforced Concrete Building Columns Using FRPC Jackets," Proc.6th USNCEE,Seattle,1998.

同被引文献3

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部