期刊文献+

有毒化学品泄漏事故应急防护行动决策探讨 被引量:4

Decision making of emergency protective actions for leakage accidents from toxic chemicals
下载PDF
导出
摘要 当发生有毒化学品泄漏事故时,为保护公众和工人的安全和健康,需要快速地选择合适的应急防护行动。通常采用的应急防护行动有疏散、隐蔽、使用个人防护装备和服用解毒剂等。决策者必须权衡大量影响因素间的相互作用,如化学品的释放特征、事故现场的气象条件及影响范围内的人群分布等来进行应急防护行动决策。本文在分析应急防护行动决策过程关键要素的基础上,详细总结了影响应急防护行动决策的因素,介绍了应急决策常用的方法,以便在有毒化学品泄漏事故的应急过程中有效决策,最大限度地减少人员伤亡。 Selecting appropriate protective actions quickly in case of leakage accidents from toxic chemicals is very important for protection of the safety and health of public and worker.Protective actions have been in general classified as shelter-in-place,evacuation and other measures such as providing personal protective equipment and specific medicines.In order to decide whether to recommend evacuation or shelter-in-place,decision makers must weigh the interactions of numerous factors including characteristics of the released chemical,potential meteorological conditions,and distribution of people that may be affected.On the basis of analyzing critical components of protective actions decision process,some factors were summarized in this paper.Methods of emergency decision making were described to prepare for effective decision making during an emergency of toxic chemicals leakage.
出处 《中国安全生产科学技术》 CAS 2012年第2期93-96,共4页 Journal of Safety Science and Technology
关键词 应急防护行动决策 疏散 隐蔽 有毒化学品泄漏 emergency protective actions decision making evacuation shelter-in-place leakage of toxic chemicals
  • 相关文献

参考文献12

  • 1重庆市安全生产应急救援指挥中心.重庆天原化工总厂“4.16”事故抢险救援情况[R].重庆,2004:2-6.
  • 2S.L.Cutter.Airborne toxic releases:are communitiesprepared?[J].Environment.1987,29(6):12-17.
  • 3王炜,张云龙,刘茂.基于决策树的危险化学品泄漏应急防护行动多级决策分析[A].2010年应急管理国际研讨会论文集[C].北京:2010:843-849.
  • 4J.Sorensen,B.Shumpert,B.Vogt.Planning for pro-tective action decision making:evacuate or shelter-in-place[J].Journal of Hazardous Materials.2004,A109:1-11.
  • 5M.S.Mannan,D.L.Kilpatick.The pros and cons ofshelter-in-place[J].Process Safety Progress.2000,19(4):210-218.
  • 6T.S.Glickman,A.M.Ujihara(Eds.).Evacuation/in-place protection decision[A].Proceedings of the Confer-ence on In-place Protection During Chemical Emergencies[C].U.S.Center for Risk Management,1989:226-239.
  • 7P.R.Jann.Evaluation of Temporary Safe Havens[A].Prepared for the 81st Annual Air Pollution Control Associ-ation Meeting[C],Dallas,Texas,1988:1236-1242.
  • 8D.J.Wilson,B.Morrison.Ordering Shelter or Evacua-tion During an Outdoor Toxic Gas Release Incident[A].The C.A.F.C.Decision Flow Chart Presented at Fire-Rescue Canada 2000[C].Montreal:2000:13-18.
  • 9R.J.Engelmann,W.R.Pendergast,J.R.White,etal.The effectiveness of stationary automobiles asshelters in accidental releases of toxic materials[J].Atmospheric Environment.1992,26a(17):3119-3125.
  • 10B.Fletcher,C.J.Saunders.Air change rates in sta-tionary and moving vehicles[J].Journal of HazardousMaterials.1994,38:243-246.

二级参考文献9

  • 1Rogers G. O. , Watson A. P. , Sorenson J. H. 1990. Evaluating protective actions for chemical agent emergencies[R]. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Oak Ridge, Tenn. 1990.
  • 2Sorensen J, Shumpert B, Vogt B. Planning Protective action decision-making: evacuate or shelter-in-place [ R ]. Oak Ridge National Laboratory. Oak Ridge, Tenn. 2002
  • 3Southworth, F. Regional Evacuation Modeling: A State-of-the-Art Review [ R ]. Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Term, 1991.
  • 4Gwynne, S. , et al. A Review of the Methodologies used in the Computer Simulation of Evacuation from the Built Environment. Building and Environment, 34 ( 1999), 741 - 749.
  • 5Sorensen J. H. , Vogt B. M. , Interactive Emergency Evacuation Guidebook [ R ]. 2006
  • 6Frieser B. I. Probabilistic evacuation decision model for river floods in the Netherlands [ R ]. Delft University of Technology, 2004
  • 7Dotson L. J, Jones J. "Identification and Analysis of Factors Affecting Emergency Evacuations" [ R ]. Sandia National Laboratory,2005
  • 8重庆市安全生产应急救援指挥中心.重庆天原化工总厂“4.16”事故抢险救援情况[R].重庆,2004
  • 9重庆市公安消防总队.重庆市公安消防总队关于天原化工总厂“4.16”事故处置情况的报告[R].重庆,2004

共引文献14

同被引文献20

  • 1李建华.灾害抢险救援技术[M].廊坊:中国人民武装警察部队学院,2005:9.
  • 2辛晶.基于区间层次分析法的核事故应急决策方案优选[J].辐射防护,2007,27(5):282-285. 被引量:17
  • 3Levy J K,Taji K. Group decision support for hazards planning andemergency management: a Group Analytic Network Process(GANP) approach [J]. Mathematical and Computer Modeling,2007,46(7):906-917.
  • 4Narzisi G, Mysore V,Mishra B. Multi-objective evolutionary opti-mization of agent based models: an application to emergency re-sponse planning [ C]//Proceedings of the IASTED InternationalConference on Computational Intelligence, ACTA Press, 2006.
  • 5Paraskevi S Georgiadou, Ioannis A Papazoglou, Chris T Kiranou-dis,et al. Multi— objective evolutionary emergency response opti-mization for major accidents [J]. Journal of Hazardous Materials,2010,178(1):792—803.
  • 6Sorensen J,Shumpert B,Vogt B. Planning for protective action de-cision making: evacuate or shelter-in-place [J]. Journal of Hazard-ous Materials, 2004,109(1) :1 —11.
  • 7Mannan M S, Kilpatick D L. The pros and cons of shelter-in-place[J]. Process Safety Progress,2000,19(4) :210 —218.
  • 8Lean Yu, Kin Keung Lai. A distance-based group decision-makingmethodology for multi-person multi-criteria emergency decisionsupport[J]. Decision Support Systems, 2011,51(2) :307 —315.
  • 9孙启悦,修光利,张大年.CAMEO在突发性环境污染事故应急中的应用[J].安全与环境学报,2008,8(3):145-149. 被引量:27
  • 10姜长杰,韦献兰.TransCAD与TransModeler在港口突发特大事故应急交通疏散问题方面的研究与应用[J].水运工程,2008(6):60-63. 被引量:5

引证文献4

二级引证文献13

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部