期刊文献+

舒芬太尼预防小儿全麻苏醒期躁动的观察 被引量:2

下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察术毕前10min静注不同剂量舒芬太尼预防小儿全麻苏醒期躁动的有效性和安全性。方法选择全麻下行腭裂修复术患儿80例,随机分为舒芬Ⅱ组,舒芬Ⅱ组,舒芬Ⅲ组和生理盐水组,每组20例。四组分别于术毕10min时静注:舒芬太尼0.05μg/kg,舒芬太尼0.15μg/kg,舒芬太尼0.25μg/kg,生理盐水3mL,观察记录各组手术结束后自主呼吸恢复时间,意识恢复时间,拔管时间,苏醒期躁动评分,术后不良反应发生率。结果与生理盐水组比,舒芬I组舒芬Ⅲ组在自主呼吸恢复时间,意识恢复时间以及拔管时间上无统计学差异(P>0.05),而舒芬Ⅲ组在三个时间上有一定延迟,有统计学意义(P<0.05);与生理盐水组比,舒芬I组在躁动评分上无统计学差异(P>0.05),而舒芬Ⅱ组和舒芬Ⅲ组在躁动评分上明显小,有统计学意义(P<0.05);与生理盐水组比,舒芬I组舒芬Ⅱ组不良反应发生率均无统计学差异(P>0.05),而舒芬Ⅲ组部分患儿出现嗜睡(P<0.05),有3例出现一过性血压降低。结论术毕前10min静注舒芬太尼0.15μg/kg或0.25μg/kg均能明显降低小儿全麻苏醒期躁动发生率,且因舒芬太尼0.15μg/kg不影响拔管时间,不增加术后不良反应发生率,而更为适合。
作者 赵志娟 王宏
出处 《中国医学工程》 2011年第11期36-37,共2页 China Medical Engineering
  • 相关文献

参考文献6

二级参考文献23

  • 1刘仁玉,吴安生.术后躁动[J].国外医学(麻醉学与复苏分册),1995,16(1):35-37. 被引量:60
  • 2Castagnini HE,van Eijs F,Salevsky FC,et al.Sevoflurane for interventional neuroradiology procedures is associated with more rapid early recovery than propofol[J].Can J Anesth,2004,51(5):486-488.
  • 3CHIA Yuan-yi, CHOW Lok-hi, HUNG Chun-ehieh, et al. Gender and pain upon movement are associated with the requirements for postoperative patlent-controlled iv analgesia: a prospective survey of 2,298 Chinese patients [J]. Canadian Journal of Anesthesia, 2002, 49(3): 249 -255.
  • 4CEPEDA M S, CARB D B. Women experience more pain and require more morphine than men to achieve a similar degree of analgesia [J].Anesth Analg, 2003, 97(5): 1464 - 1468.
  • 5CICCONE G K, HOLDCROFT A. Drugs and sex differences: a review of drugs rehting to anaesthesia [J]. Br J Anaesth, 1999, 82(2):255 - 65.
  • 6VAN DEN BERG A A, HONJOL N M, MPHANZA T, et al. Vomiting,retching, headache and restlessness after halothane, isoflurane and enflurane-based anaesthesia. An Analysis of pooled data following ear,nose throat and eye surgery [J] . Acta Anaesthsiol Scand, 1998, 42(6): 658 -663.
  • 7BEADY L B. Acute pain: lessons learned from 25, 000 patients [J].Beg Ancsth Pain Med, 1999, 24(6): 499-505.
  • 8Glass PSA, Sharer SL, Reves JG. Intravenous drug delivery system. In: Miller RD, eds. Anesthesia. 5th ed. New York: Churchill Livingstone, 2001. 377-411.
  • 9Campistol JM, Sacks SH. Mechanisms of nephrotoxicity. Transplantation, 2000, 69 : SS5-10.
  • 10Dennis MJ, Foster MC, Ryan J J, et al. The increasing importance of chronic rejection as a cause of renal allograft failure. Transpl Int,1989, 2:214-217.

共引文献380

同被引文献17

引证文献2

二级引证文献9

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部