期刊文献+

日间与夜间靶控输注异丙酚镇静效果的比较 被引量:10

Comparison of the hypnotic effect of propofol administered by TCI during day-time and night-time
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的通过比较日间与夜间靶控输注异丙酚的镇静效果,探讨近日节律对异丙酚镇静效果的影响。方法局部或臂丛神经阻滞下行急诊手部小手术的男性患者65例,ASA分级Ⅰ或Ⅱ级,年龄18~55岁,BMI18.5~24.9kg/m2,根据患者手术时间分为日间组(07:01至19:oo)和夜间组(19:01至07:00)。行臂丛或局部神经阻滞,确认麻醉效果完善后开始靶控输注异丙酚,靶控输注过程采用阶梯给药方式,设定4个目标效应室靶控浓度,依次为0.8、1.2、2.0和4.0μg/ml。当异丙酚效应室浓度达到预设值后,维持5min,记录该浓度下的BIS值。靶控输注过程中每分钟进行1次警觉镇静评分(OAA/S评分),并记录OAA/S评分为2分(患者意识消失)时的BIS值和异丙酚效应室浓度。结果共有58例患者完成研究,其中日间组28例,夜间组30例。与日间组比较,夜间组BIS基础状态、异丙酚效应室浓度1.2和2.0μg/ml时BIS值降低(P〈0.05),异丙酚效应室浓度0.8和4.0μg/ml时BIS值差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05),OAA/S2分时异丙酚效应室浓度降低(P〈0.05)而BIS值差异无统计学意义(P〉0.05)。结论近日节律可影响患者异丙酚的镇静效果,表现为夜间镇静效果强于日间。 Objective To compare the hypnotic effect of propofol administered by target-controlled infusion (TCI) during day-time and night-time, in order to explore the effect of circadian rhythms on the sedative effect of propofol. Methods Sixty-five male ASA 1 or I1 patients aged 18-55 yr undergoing emergency minor hand surgery were divided into 2 gorups according to the time of the day when they received propofol TCI : day-time group (from 7:01 to 19:00) and night-time group (from 19:01 to 7:00). The pharmacokinetic parameters proposed by Schnider which predict effect-site concentration (Ce) were used. Four effect-site concentrations of propofol were set: 0.8, 1.2, 2.0 and 4.0 μg/ml. Ce was increased step by step and each Ce was maintained for 5 min. The level of sedation at each Ce was assessed by BIS and OAA/S scores. BIS value and Ce of propofol were recorded and compared between the 2 groups when the patients lost c9nsciousness (OAA/S score = 2). Results There was 28 and 30 patients in day-time and nigher-time groups respectively. When Ce = 1.2 and 2.0 μg/ml, the BIS values were significantly lower in night-time group than in day-time group. There was no significant difference in BIS value between the 2 groups when Ce = 0.8 and 4.0 μg/ml. When the patients lost consciousness (OAA/S = 2), the BIS value was comparable between the 2 groups, but Ce was significantly lower in night-time group than that in daytime group. Conclusion The hypnotic effect of propofol is greater during night-time than during day-time.
出处 《中华麻醉学杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第1期57-59,共3页 Chinese Journal of Anesthesiology
基金 江苏省教育厅开放课题(KJS07004)
关键词 生物节律 二异丙酚 清醒镇静 Circadian rhythm Propofol Conscious sedation
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

  • 1Smolensky MH, Haus E. Circadian rhythms and clinical medicine with applications to hypertension. Am J Hypertens ,2001,14(9 Pt 2) : 280S-290S.
  • 2Haus E, Smolensky MH. Biologic rhythms in the 'immune system. Chronobiol Int, 1999,16(5) :581-622.
  • 3Hans E, Cusulos M, Sackett-Lundeen L, et al. Circadian variations in blood coagulation parameters, alpha-antitrypsin antigen and plate- let aggregation and retention in clinically healthy subjects. Chronobiol Int, 1990,7 (3) : 203-216.
  • 4Bruguerolle B. Chronopharmacokinetics. Current status. Clin Phar- macokinet, 1998,35 (2) : 83-94.
  • 5Challet E, Gourmelen S, Pevet P, et al. Reciprocal relationships be- tween general (propofol) anesthesia and circadian time in rats. Neu- ropsychopharmacology,2007, 32(3) :728-735.
  • 6Sato Y, Seo N, Kobahashi E. The dosing-time dependent effects of intravenous hypnotics in mice. Anesth Analg, 2005, 101 (6) : 1706- 1708.
  • 7Irwin MG, Thompson N, Kenny GN. Patient-maintained propofol se- dation. Assessment of a target-controlled infusion system. Anaesthe- sia, 1997,52(6) :525-530.
  • 8Casati A, Fanelli G, Casaletti E, et al. Clinical assessment of tar- get-controlled infusion of propofol during monitored anesthesia care. Can J Anaesth, 1999,46(3) : 235-239.
  • 9Janzen PR, Hall WJ, Hopkins PM. Setting targets for sedation with a target-controlled propofol infusion. Anaesthesia, 2000, 55 (7) : 666- 669.
  • 10Furukawa T, Manabe S, Watanabe T, et al. Sex difference in the- daily rhythm of hepatic P450 monooxygenase activities in rats is regu- lated by growthhormone release. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol, 1999, 161 (3) : 219-224.

同被引文献80

  • 1郑瑞强,刘玲,邱海波.《2004严重感染和感染性休克治疗指南》系列讲座(7) 严重感染的镇静和血糖控制等治疗[J].中国危重病急救医学,2005,17(1):4-6. 被引量:57
  • 2陈勇,佘守章,闫焱,许学兵.腰-硬联合麻醉患者异丙酚不同镇静深度下半数有效的浓度、脑电双频指数和听觉诱发电位指数[J].中华麻醉学杂志,2005,25(2):105-107. 被引量:12
  • 3Leslie K, Clavisi O, Hargrove J. Target-controlled infusion ver- sus manually-controlled infusion of propofolfor general anaesthesia or sedation in adults. Anesth Analg,2008,107 ( 6 ) : 2089. doi: 10. 1213/ANE. 0b013e3181891464.
  • 4Milne SE, Kenny GN, Schraag S. Propofol sparing effect of remifentanil using closed-loop anaesthesia. Br J Anaesth,2003 , 90 ( 5 ) : 623-629.
  • 5Yufune S,Takamatsu i, Masui K, et al. Efiect of remifen- tanil on plasma propofol concentration andbispectral index during propofol anaesthesia[J].Br J Anesth, 2011,106 (2) :208-214.
  • 6Gambus P,Jenesn E W, Jospin M, et al. Modeling theef- fects of propofol and remifentanil combinations fur seda- tion-anaglgesia in endoscopic procedures using an adap- tive neuro fuzzy inference system (ANFIS) [ J ]. Anesth- Analg,2011, 112 (2) :331-339.
  • 7Liang C, Cang J,Wang H,et al. Propofol attenuates ce-re- bral ischemia/reperfusion injury partially using heme oxy- genase-1 [ J ]. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol, 2013,25 ( 3 ) : 311-316.
  • 8Panda S, H ogenesch JB,Kay SA. Circadian rhythms from flies to human[J]. Nature, 2002,417(6886) : 329.
  • 9Amigoni A,Mozzo E,Brugnaro L, et al . Assessing sedation in a pediatric intensive care unit using Comfort Behavioural Scale and bispectral index:these tools are different[J]. Minerva Anestesiol, 2012,78(3), 322.
  • 10Furukawa T,Manabe S,Watanabe T. Sex difference in thedaily rhythm of hepatic P450 monooxygenase activities in rats is regu- lated by growthhormone[J]. Release, 1999,161 (3) : 219.

引证文献10

二级引证文献14

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部