摘要
为探明不同类型烤房对烤后烟叶品质的影响,进行了普通烤房(C1)、普改密烤房(C2)及气流下降式密集烤房(C3)对比试验。结果表明:不同烤房调制的相同部位烟叶收缩率、含梗率均为C1>C2>C3,而叶片厚度和单叶重为C3>C2>C1;C1调制的下部叶、C3调制的中上部叶的外观质量略差;C1调制的下部C叶1化调学制成的分下最部不叶协评调吸,品而质C2最与低C,3C 2的最下高部,叶中化上学部成叶分评接吸近品,质中为部C2叶>C为1>普C C32;>烟C1叶>C综3合,上外部观叶品为质C1、>化C2学>成C3分;及评吸品质为C2>C1>C3;烤后烟叶经济性状指标为C3>C2>C1。
For studying the effects of barn types on cured tobacco leaf quality, the traditional barn (cl) , upgraded conventional curing barns (c2)and down draught bulk curing barn (c3)were compared. The results showed that the barns in the order of the shrinkage and stem percentage of tobacco leaves from the same stalk position were c1〉c2〉c3, while in the order of leaf thickness and single leaf weight were c3〉c2〉cl. The appearance quality of lower leaves cured in cl and that of upper and middle leaves cured in c3 was slightly lower. The chemical composition in lower leaves cured in cl was not as harmonious as that cured in c2 and c3. The barns in the order of chemical harmony for middle leaves were c2〉c1〉c3, for upper leaves were c1〉c2〉c3. The barns in the order of sensory quality for lower leaves were c2〉c3〉cl, for upper and middle leaves were c2〉 c1〉c3. The barns in the order of comprehensive results of appearance quality, chemical composition and sensory quality of tobacco leaves were c2〉c1〉c3, in the order of leaf economic characters were c3〉c2〉cl.
出处
《烟草科技》
EI
CAS
北大核心
2012年第3期75-78,共4页
Tobacco Science & Technology
关键词
烤烟
云烟85
烤房
烘烤
烟叶品质
Flue-cured tobacco
Yunyan85
Barn
Flue-curing
Tobacco leaf quality