期刊文献+

日本高等教育质量评价体系研究——基于评价模式的视角 被引量:5

Higher Education Quality Evaluation System Research in Japan——Based on the evaluation mode
原文传递
导出
摘要 评价运动的出现是对大学内外事务问责要求的表达。20世纪末,高等教育质量评价运动国际化趋势愈加明显,而日本也在这样的大背景下汇入高等教育质量评价运动潮流。日本当前高等教育质量评价体系是一个多元化评价模式的有机结合体,这种以问题/方法取向评价模式与改进/绩效取向评价模式为主的结合体克服了实证主义者意识形态与管理者意识形态的弊端。基于评价模式的视角,从评价目标的科学性、过程的合理性、目标的达成度以及效果的长效性四个维度探究日本高等教育质量评价体系的有效性,有利于推动我国高等教育质量评价体系的建立与完善。 The emergence of evaluation movement expresses the requirement for accountability of internal and external affairs of universities. The trend of internationalization of quality evaluation movement in higher education became apparent in the late of 20th century, and Japan also participated in tthe quality evaluation movement trend in higher education under such background.Current higher education quality evaluation system in Japan is a organic combination of multiple evaluation model, mainly combining problem/method orientated evaluation model and improvement/ performance orientated evaluation model, which overcomes the flaw of positivist ideology and managers ideology. Based on the evaluation mode, effectiveness of higher education quality evaluation system in Japan will be explored from evaluation target's, process's rationality, target's degree and effect's long-term, which is helpful for promoting establishment and consummation of higher education quality evaluation system in China.
作者 吴越
出处 《中国高教研究》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第4期41-46,共6页 China Higher Education Research
基金 国家社会科学基金"十一五"规划教育学2008年度一般课题"社会问责视野中的我国高等教育质量评估体系有效性研究"(项目编号:BIA20080027) 四川省教育厅2012年度重点课题"地方本科院校内部质量保障体系研究"的研究成果
关键词 日本高等教育 质量评价体系 评价模式 有效性 Japanese higher education quality evaluation system evaluation mode effectiveness
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1吴越.日本走上高等教育强国的历程及其经验[J].赣南师范学院学报,2009,30(2):51-56. 被引量:5
  • 2Skolnik M L. Quality assurance in higher education as a political process[J].Higher Education Management and Policy, 2010, 22(01): 79-98.
  • 3Toma S G, Naruo S. Quality Assurance in the Japanese Universities[J]. The Amfiteatru Economic Journal, 2009, 11 (26).
  • 4郑晓齐.欧洲地区高等教育质量保障体系研究[M].北京:北京航空航天大学出版社.2007.
  • 5Van Vught F A, Westerheijden D F. Towards a general model of quality assessment in higher education[J ]. Higher Education, 1994, 28(03).
  • 6Kushimoto T. Outcomes assessment and its role in self- reviews of undergraduate education: in the context of Japanese higher education reforms since the 1990s[J]. Higher Education, 2010, 59(05).
  • 7Mori R. Accreditation systems in Japan and the United States: A comparative perspective on governmentalinvolvement[J]. New Directions for Higher Education, 2009, 2009(145).
  • 8Institute for Higher Education Policy. Impact of College Rankings on Institutional Decision Making: Four Country Case Studies. Issue Brief[R]. 2009.
  • 9StufflebeamDanielL,等.评估模型[M].苏锦丽,等.译.北京:北京大学出版社.2007.
  • 10桧国兴.日本高等教育评价制度研究[M].合肥:安徽教育出版社,安徽出版集团,2007:64.

二级参考文献20

共引文献26

同被引文献16

引证文献5

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部