期刊文献+

从“Three Ds”看英语中的性别歧视 被引量:3

"Three Ds" and Sexism in English
下载PDF
导出
摘要 语言是由社会结构所决定的社会实践。受父权文化的影响,男女两性之间的地位差异和对女性的歧视在英语中有着或隐或显的反映,这些性别歧视可以用"Three Ds"加以概括,即Dismissing(指女性在语言中的"缺席"或"消失"),Defining(指女性的地位由她的职业、家庭婚姻等方面的地位而决定)和Deprecating(即语言中对女性带歧视、藐视的那些语词)。从两性差异的角度对英语做细致的分析能帮助我们了解语言与文化的现实,了解性别与性别身份是如何通过语言得到再现和确认的,从而有利于提高跨文化交际的能力与效果。 Language is social practice determined by social structures.There are covert or overt reflections of sexism in English owing to the influence of patriarchal culture.These reflections can be generalized as "Three Ds",i.e.dismissing(dismissing females by using male phrases and terms),defining(a woman ' s status is defined by her place in occupations and relationships),and deprecating(There are many terms or expressions in English referring to women in which women are trivialized and derogated).A subtle analysis of the language from the perspective of gender can be helpful for us in understanding better the linguistic and cultural reality,and knowing how gender and identity is represented and established through language,and therefore help raise our cross-cultural performance and efficiency.
作者 刘霞敏
出处 《外国语文》 CSSCI 北大核心 2011年第6期64-69,共6页 Foreign Languages and Literature
基金 湖南省教育厅科研项目"英语的社会性别区分"的阶段性成果(项目编号:02C500)
关键词 英语 THREE DS 性别歧视 English Three Ds sexism
  • 相关文献

参考文献16

  • 1Benokraitis,Nijole V.Marriage and Families[M]. Engle-wood Cliffs,New Jersey:Prentice Hall,1993.
  • 2Cameron,Deborah&Don Kulick.Language and Sexuality[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,200.
  • 3Eckert,P.&S.McConnell-Ginet.Language and Gender[M]. Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2003.
  • 4Fairclough,Norman.Language and Power[M]. Edin-burgh:Oearson Education Limited,2001.
  • 5Gee,J.Paul.An Introduction to Discourse Analysis:Theoryand Method[M]. London:Routledge/Beijing.
  • 6Gibbon,Margaret.Feminist Perspectives on language[M]. London and New York:Longman,1999.
  • 7Lee,D.Competing Discourse:Perspective and Ideology inLanguage[M]. London:Longman,1992.
  • 8Mills,Sara.Feminist Stylistics[M]. London and NewYork:Routledge,1995.
  • 9Pearson,J.C.et al.Gender and Communication[M]. Dubuque,IA,USA:Wm.C.Brown Publishers,1991.
  • 10Strunk,Jr.W.&E.B.White.The Elements of Style[M]. New York:Macmillan Publishing Co.,Inc.,1979.

共引文献27

同被引文献39

  • 1牛励强,于逢春.英语语言中性别歧视现象探究[J].吉林大学社会科学学报,1997,37(2):55-58. 被引量:8
  • 2乔治·爱略特.米德尔马契[Z].项星耀译.北京:人民文学出版社,1987.
  • 3约翰·罗尔斯.正义论[M].北京:中国社会科学出版社,1988..
  • 4休谟.人性论[M].北京:商务出版社.1996:226.
  • 5LAKOFF G, M JOHNSON. Metaphors We Live By [ M ]. Chicago : The University of Chicago Press, 1980.
  • 6GEERAERTS D. Ten Lectures on Cognitive Sociolinguis- tics [M]. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Re- search Press,2010.
  • 7COLSTON H, S LEE. Gender differences in verbal irony use [ J ]. Metaphor and Symbol, 2004,19 (4) : 289 - 306.
  • 8FONTECHA A, R CATALAN. Semantic derogation in an- imal metaphor: A contrastive - cognitive analysis of two male/female examples in English and Spanish [J]. Jour- nal of Pragmaties, 2003, 35:771 -797.
  • 9VELASCO - SACRISTAN M. Metonymie grounding of i- deological metaphors: Evidence from advertising gender metaphors [ J ]. Journal of Pragmatics, 2010,42 : 64 - 96.
  • 10JESPERSEN O. Language: Its Nature, Development and Origin [ M]. London: Allen and Unwin,1922.

引证文献3

二级引证文献4

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部