期刊文献+

消费决策中羊群行为的启发式加工及产生根源

Heuristic Processing and Cause of the Herd Behavior in Consumption Decision
下载PDF
导出
摘要 消费决策中的羊群行为是消费市场上的一种典型现象。它是指在不确定情境中,消费者模仿他人进行消费决策的行为。本研究通过两个实验逐步揭示了消费决策中羊群行为的产生根源。实验1研究表明,消费决策中的羊群行为是消费者利用一致性启发式或能力启发式加工信息的结果。实验2通过内隐联想测验进一步研究表明,个体使用两种启发式的原因在于消费者对大众和专家的刻板印象:他们总是认为大众和专家的决策是正确的。 The herd behavior performed by consumers is a typical phenomenon in the consumption decision. It refers to the behavior that consumers follow others' decisions in uncertain situations. We conducted two experiments to explore the cause of herd behavior in consumption decision. The first one demonstrated the herd behavior of consumers was the result of using consensus heuristic or competence heuristic. In the second experiment, we explored the cause of u-sing consensus heuristic and competence heuristic by Brief Implicit Association Test (BIAT). The resuhs suggested that the cause of using the two kinds of heuristic was the stereotypical thinking that people always believe the decision of majority or experts is right.
出处 《应用心理学》 CSSCI 2011年第4期371-377,共7页 Chinese Journal of Applied Psychology
关键词 消费决策 羊群行为 启发式加工 内隐态度 consumption decision herd behavior heuristic processing implicit attitude
  • 相关文献

参考文献2

二级参考文献57

  • 1Bluemke, M., & Friese, M. (2008). Reliability and validity of the Single-Target IAT (ST-IAT): Assessing automatic affect toward multiple political groups. European Journal of Social Psychology, 38, 977-997.
  • 2Brendl, C. M. Markman, A. B., & Messner, C. (2001). How do indirect measures of evaluation work? Evaluating the inference of prejudice in the Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 81, 760-773.
  • 3De Houwer, J. (2003). The Extrinsic Affective Simon Task. Experimental Psychology, 50, 77-85.
  • 4Greenwald, A. G., & Farnham, S. D. (2000). Using the Implicit Association Test to measure self-esteem and self-concept. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 79 (6), 1022-1038.
  • 5Greenwald, A. G., McGhee, D. E., & Schwartz, J. L. K. (1998). Measuring individual differences in implicit cognition: The Implicit Association Test. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74, 1464-1480.
  • 6Greenwald, A. G., Nosek, B. A., & Banaji, M. R. (2003). Understanding and using the Implicit Association Test: I. An improved scoring algorithm. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 85, 197-216.
  • 7Greenwald, A. G., Smith, C. T., Sriram, N., Bar-Arian, Y., & Nosek, B. A. (2009).Implicit race attitudes predicted vote in the 2008 US presidential election. Analyses of Social Issues and Public Policy, 9 (1), 241-253.
  • 8Hofmann, W., Gawronski, B., Oschwendner, T., Le, H., & Schmitt, M. (2005). A meta-analysis on the correlation between the Implicit Association Test and explicit self-report measures. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 31, 1369-1385.
  • 9Karpinski, A., & Steinman, R. B. (2006). The single category implicit association test (SC-IAT) as a measure of implicit social cognition, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 91, 16-32.
  • 10Nosek, B. A. (2005). Moderators of the relationship between implicit and explicit evaluation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134, 565-584.

共引文献160

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部