摘要
在《海峡两岸经济合作框架协议》基础上,构建两岸投资保障的法律机制已是现实诉求。在解析海峡两岸法制现状基础上,进一步分析了构建海峡两岸投资保障法律机制的现实意义,并比较分析了大陆与港澳CEPA模式、北美自由贸易协定、中国——东盟自由贸易区模式、WTO中的TRIMs中关于投资保障法律机制的经验,寻求其对两岸投资保障法律机制的启示。构建海峡两岸的投资保障法律机制,首先须理清思路,并提出签署两岸投资保障协议、采用国民待遇和最惠国待遇、建立具有两岸特色的投资争端解决和仲裁机制、提高法律法规透明度等具体措施。
Based on Cross-strait Economic Cooperation Framework Agreement, it is important that we should build the legal mechanisms for the safeguard cross-strait investment. From the present situation, the paper points that the legal system construction of safeguard cross-strait investment has significance and influence. For the sake enlightenment, it successively compares the experience of legal system on safeguard investment for CEPA, NAFTA, China-ASEAN FTA, TRIMs. For the legal system for safeguard cross-strait investment, the paper argues that the thoughts should be cleared up at first, and then suggests that it early sign a cross-strait investment protection agreement, adopt the national treatment and the most-favourednation treatment, build a special dispute settlement mechanism, and improve the transparency of laws and regulations.
关键词
两岸投资
双向投资
投资保障
cross-strait investment
two-way investment
safeguard investment