期刊文献+

铜绿假单胞菌对耐甲氧西林表皮葡萄球菌和粪肠球菌的体外抑菌作用研究 被引量:3

Study of in vitro inhibitory activity of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis and Enterococcus faecalis
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的观察铜绿假单胞菌抗菌物质对耐甲氧西林表皮葡萄球菌(methicillin-resistant Staphylococcusepidermidis,MRSE)和粪肠球菌的体外抑菌活性。方法用交叉条带实验方法进行铜绿假单胞菌对10株MRSE和11株粪肠球菌的体外抑制活性的测定。结果铜绿假单胞菌抗菌物质对MRSE和粪肠球菌的体外抑菌活性良好,10株铜绿假单胞菌对MRSE和粪肠球菌的抗菌作用,其中第3、4、5、6号和8、9号铜绿假单胞菌对MRSE的抑制率均达到了100%,第1、3、4、6号铜绿假单胞菌对粪肠球菌抑制率也达到了100%。结论铜绿假单胞菌抗菌物质对10株MRSE和11株粪肠球菌具有良好的抗菌活性,无疑对MRSE和粪肠球菌的抗菌药物研究方面开辟了新的思路。 Objective To evaluate the in vitro inhibitory activity of antibacterial material of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against methieillin-resistant Staphylococcus epidermidis(MRSE), and Enterococeus faecalis. Methods The in vitro inhibitory activity of antibacterial material of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against 10 MRSE, and 12 Enteroeoccus faecalis was performed by using the cross streak assay. Results The in vitro inhibitory activity of antibacterial material of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against MRSE, and E. faecalis was good. The inhibition rates of No. 3,4,5,6 and 8,9 of P. aeruginosas against MRSE were up to 100 %, and No. 1,3,4, and 6 of P. aeruginosas against E faecalis up to 100%, too. Conclusion The antibacterial material of Pseudomonas aeruginosa against 10 MRSE, and .11 E faecalis had strong antibacterial activity,which brings the potential to open a new train of thoughts for the antibiotics research of MRSE, and Enterococcus infections.
出处 《临床荟萃》 CAS 2012年第7期581-584,F0003,共5页 Clinical Focus
关键词 假单胞菌 铜绿 葡萄球菌 表皮 肠球菌 微生物敏感试验 Pseudomonas aeruginosa Staphylococcus epidermidis Enteroeoccus faecalis microbial sensitivitytests
  • 相关文献

参考文献10

  • 1Sood S,Malhotra M,Das BK,et al.Enterococcal infections&antimicrobial resistance[J].Indian J Med Res,2008,128(2):111-121.
  • 2Kondo S,Sato N,Yamada T,et al.Antibiotic activity of P.aeruginosa against MRSA and Candida albicans[J].Kansenshogaku Zasshi,2002,76(4):231-237.
  • 3Holt JG.Bergey’s manual of derminative bacteriology[M].9thed.Biltimore:Williams&Wilkins,1994:151-157.
  • 4Garrity GM.Bergey’s manual of systematic bacteriology[M].2nd ed.vol.2.New York:Springer,2005:323-359.
  • 5Murray PR.Manual of clinical microbiology[M].9th ed.Washington DC:American Society for Microbiology,2007:1762-1766.
  • 6Stephen HG,Hawkey MP.Principles and practice of clinicalbacteriology[M].2nd ed.Birmingham:John Wiley and SonsLtd,2006:427-443.
  • 7Dénervaud V,TuQuoc P,Blanc D,et al.Characterization ofcell-to-cell signaling-deficient Pseudomonas aeruginosa strainscolonizing intubated patients[J].J Clin Microbial,2004,42(2):554-562.
  • 8葛宜和,赵彦宏,陈丽娟,缪静,温鲁.藤黄绿脓菌素的自诱导及假单胞菌M18抗生物质代谢相关性初步分析[J].微生物学报,2007,47(3):441-446. 被引量:10
  • 9Upadhyay RK,Mukerji KG,Chamola BP.Biocontrol potentialand its exploitation in sustainable agriculture:crop diseases,weeds,and nematodes[M].New York:Springer,2001:56-59.
  • 10李湘民,胡白石,许志刚,T.W.MEW.拮抗细菌菌株Pseudomonas fluorescens 7-14在水稻植株上的时间、空间定殖型[J].植物病理学报,2003,33(5):468-473. 被引量:7

二级参考文献38

  • 1葛宜和,黄显清,王素莲,张雪红,许煜泉.假单胞菌gacA插入突变对藤黄绿脓菌素和吩嗪-1-羧酸合成代谢的差异性调控[J].微生物学报,2004,44(6):761-765. 被引量:3
  • 2陈晓斌.[D].杭州:浙江大学,2000.
  • 3Bahme J B, Schroth M N. Spatial-temporal colonization patterns of a rhizobacterium on underground organs of potato [ J ]. Phytopathology, 1987,77: 1093- 1100.
  • 4Weller D M, Cook R J. Suppression of take-all of wheat by seed treatments with fluorescent pseudomonads [ J ]. Phytopathology, 1983, 73 :465 - 469.
  • 5Weller D M. Biological control of soilborne plant pathogens in the rhizosphere with bacteria [ A ]. Annu Rev Phytopathol [ M ]. St Paul, MN:American Phytopathological Society, 1988. 26: 379-407.
  • 6Bull C T. Wheat root colonization by disease suppressive or nonsuppressive bacteria and the effect of population size on severity of take-all cased by Gaeumannomyces graminis var. tritici [ D ]. Pullmam: Washington State University , 1987.
  • 7Loper J E , Suslow T V, Schroth M N. Lognormal distribution of bacterial populations in rhizosphere [J]. Phytopathology, 1984, 74: 1454-1460.
  • 8Leben C, Draft G C, Willson J D, et al. Field tests for disease control by an epiphytic bacterium[J]. Phytopathology, 1965, 55:1375 - 1376.
  • 9Stockwell V O, Johnson K B, Loper J E. Compatibility of bacterial antagonists of Erwinia amylovora with antibiotics used to control fire blight [J]. Phytopathology, 1996,86:834 - 840.
  • 10Lindow S E, McGoukrty G, Elkins R. Interactions of antibiotics with Pseudomonas fluorescens strain A506 in the control of fire blight and frost injury to pear [J]. Phytopathology, 1996,86:841 - 848.

共引文献12

同被引文献9

引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部