期刊文献+

论三种戏剧对话模式 被引量:1

原文传递
导出
摘要 不同风格戏剧作品运用不同模式对话,以三种模式最为常见:日常、法庭与荒诞模式。日常模式与日常对话仿真度高,但同时高于生活,具有隐喻特征;法庭模式集中表现伦理力量的冲突;荒诞模式辅助传递"荒诞"主题意义。日常与法庭模式主要功能为情感、意动与描述,传递叙事意义,体现权势关系,推进情节发展;荒诞模式主要功能为寒暄与诗化。语言模式的转变反映戏剧风格从古典主义到现实主义再到现代主义的转变。
作者 李一坤
出处 《戏剧文学》 北大核心 2012年第4期64-69,共6页
  • 相关文献

参考文献15

  • 1Moncada S, et al. Nitric oxide: Physiology, pathophysiology, and pharmacology. Pharmacol Rev, 1991, 43: 109
  • 2Drazen D L, et al. Reproductive function in female mice lacking the gene for endothelial nitric oxide synthase. Nitric Oxide, 1999, 3: 366
  • 3Dixit V D, et al. Nitric oxide and the control of reproduction. Animal Reprod Sci, 2001, 65: 1
  • 4MILLER,ARTHUR.The Crucible[M]New York:Bantam Books,1959.
  • 5Bu S M, et al. Nitric oxide derived from cumulus cells promotes the meiotic resumption in mouse. Chinese Science Bulletin, 2002, 47: 1730
  • 6WILLIAMS,TENNESSEE.A Streetcar Named Desire[M]New York:Signet,1947.
  • 7Tao Y, et al. Nitric oxide exerts different functions on porcine oocytes cultured in different models, which is affected by beta-mercaptoethanol. Asian-Austr J Anim Sci, 2004, 17: 317
  • 8Chen H W, et al. Nitric oxide as a regulator in preimplantation embryo development and apoptosis. Fertil Steril, 2001, 75: 1163
  • 9艾斯林.荒诞派戏剧[M].石家庄:河北教育出版社,2003.
  • 10Jablonka-Shariff A, et al. Hormonal regulation of nitric oxide synthases and their cell-specific expression during follicular development in the rat ovary. Endocrinology, 1997, 138: 460

二级参考文献27

  • 1杨雪燕.话语分析与戏剧语言文体学[J].外语教学与研究,1991,23(2):17-22. 被引量:26
  • 2俞东明.戏剧文体与戏剧文体学[J].浙江大学学报(社会科学版),1996,26(1):100-103. 被引量:45
  • 3Alter, J. 1979. Coding dramatic efficiency in plays: From text to stage. Semiotica, 28.3/4, 247-258.
  • 4Brown, P & Levinson, S. C. 1987. Politeness: Universals in Language Usage. Cambridge: CUP.
  • 5Egan, R. 1989. Anger and the actor: Another look back. Modern Drama, vol 32, 413-424.
  • 6Elam, K. 1980. The semiotics of theatre and drama. London: Methuen.
  • 7Gilleman, L. M. 1997. The logic of anger and despair: A pragmatic approach the John Osborne's Look Back in Anger. In P. D.Denison ed. John Osborne: A Casebook, pp.71-90. New York and London: Garland Publishing Inc.
  • 8Green, G. M. 1989. Pragmatics and natural language understanding. New York: Laurence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
  • 9Herman, V. 1991. Dramatic dialogue and the systematics of tm-taking. Semiotica, 83.1/2, 97-121.
  • 10Herman, V. 1995. Dramatic discourse: Dialogue as interaction in plays. London: Routledge.

共引文献61

引证文献1

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部