期刊文献+

孕鼠与非孕鼠重症急性胰腺炎多器官损伤的对比 被引量:1

Comparative experimental study on multiple organ damage between pregnant rats and non-pregnant rats with severe acute pancreatitis
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的观察孕鼠和非孕鼠重症急性胰腺炎(SAP)各器官的功能和组织病理变化。方法SD孕鼠分为孕鼠组和孕鼠SAP组,非孕雌鼠分为SO组和SAP组,分别设立3、6、12h时间点,各时间点8只。检测血清淀粉酶(AMY)、肝功能酶学指标[丙氨酸转氨酶(ALT)、天冬氨酸转氨酶(AST)]、肾功能[肌酐(Cr)、尿素氮(BUN)],观察胰腺、肝脏、肾脏、肺和心脏组织病理变化。结果孕鼠SAP组AMY和胰腺组织病理评分在3、6h显著高于SAP组(P〈0.05),肝、肾功能在3.6、12h均高于SAP组[3h AIJT(128.38±24.92)比(99.75±16.27)U/L,AST(261.25±64.98)比(194.50±49.00)U/L,Cr(52.38±8.99)比(41.88±7.28)μmol/L,BUN(8.63±1.24)比(7.11±1.29)mmol/L,P〈0.05],肝脏和肾脏组织病理评分(6h肝脏2.13±0.44比1.56±0.49,肾脏5.25±1.28比3.88±1.13),在6、12h,肺脏组织病理评分在12h显著高于SAP组(5.00±0.85比3.75±0.49,P〈0.05)。结论孕鼠较非孕鼠胰腺炎发病要急且病情进展更快,并发多器官损伤时间更早且损伤程度更重。 Objective To observe the functional changes and the histopathological changes of mul- tiple organs in pregnant rats and non-pregnant female rats with severe acute pancreatitis (SAP). Methods Pregnant SD rats were randomly divided into pregnancy group and SAP group, and non-pregnant female rats were randomly divided into sham operation group (SO group) and SAP group. Rats were killed at 3rd, 6th and 12th h. Serum amylase (AMY), liver function [ alanine transaminase (ALT), aspartate aminotrans- ferase (AST)], and renal function [creatinine (Cr), blood urea nitrogen (BUN)] were detected. The pathological changes in the pancreas, liver, kidney, lung and heart tissues were observed. Results Amylase and histological scores of the pancreas at 3rd, and 6th h were higher significantly in SAP group of pregnant rats than those in SAP group (P 〈 0. 05). Liver function levels at each time point were higher significandy in SAP group of pregnant rats than those in SAP group [3 h: ALT ( 128.38±24. 92) vs (99.75±16.27) U/L, AST (261.25±64.98) vs (194.50±49.00) U/L, Cr (52.38 ±8.99) vs (41.8±7. 28 ) Ixmol/L, BUN ( 8. 63±1.24 ) vs ( 7.11 ±1.29 ) mmol/L, P 〈 0.05 ]. Histological scores of the liver and kidneys at 3rd and 6th h (6 h: liver 2. 13 ±0. 44 vs 1.56±0.49, kidney 5.25±1.28 vs 3.88±1.13 ,P 〈0. 05), and those of the lungs at 12th h (5.00±0. 85 vs 3. 75 ±0. 49,P 〈0. 05) were higher significantly in SAP group of pregnant rats than in SAP group. Conclusion Compared with non-pregnant rats, the pancreatitis occurring in pregnant rats is more acute and more severe, and multiple organ damage occurs earlier and more severe.
出处 《中华实验外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期674-677,共4页 Chinese Journal of Experimental Surgery
基金 湖北省教育厅科学技术研究计划指导性项目(B20102106)
关键词 妊娠 重症胰腺炎 多器官损伤 Pregnancy Severe pancreatitis Multiple organ injury
  • 相关文献

参考文献8

  • 1Or~a A, Ocampo C, Zandalazini H, et al. Internal drainage of giant a- cute pseudocysts:the role of video-assisted pancreatic necroseetomy. Arch Surg,2000,135 : 136-140 ; discussion 141.
  • 2Schmidt J, Rattner DW, Lewandrowski K, et al. A better model of acute pancreatitis for evaluating therapy. Ann Surg, 1992,215:44-56.
  • 3Camargo CA Jr, Madden JF, Gao W, et al. Interleukin-6 protects liver against warm ischemia/reperfusion injury and promotes hepatocyte proliferation in the rodent. Hepatology, 1997,26:1513-1520.
  • 4Yekebas EF, Strate T, Zolmajd S, et'al. Impact of different modalities of continuous venovenous hemofiltration on sepsis-induced alterations in experimental pancreatitis. Kidney Int ,2002,62 : 1806-1818.
  • 5Rona G, Chappel CI, Balazs T, et al. An infarct-like myocardial lesion and other toxic manifestations produced by isoproterenol in the rat. AMA Arch Pathol, 1959,67:443-455.
  • 6孙备,白雪巍,孟庆辉,王刚,许军,姜洪池.核转录因子抑制剂对重症急性胰腺炎的影响[J].中华实验外科杂志,2006,23(2):179-181. 被引量:16
  • 7杨祖菁.妊娠合并急性胰腺炎对母儿的危害[J].实用妇产科杂志,2009,25(6):326-328. 被引量:7
  • 8庄岩,杨尹默,王维民,万远廉,黄延庭.急性胰腺炎鼠白细胞介素(IL)1β、IL-18、肿瘤坏死因子α、IL-1β转化酶的表达[J].中华实验外科杂志,2005,22(1):71-72. 被引量:34

二级参考文献9

  • 1Mews P, Philips P, Fahmy R, et al. Pancreatic stellate cells respond to inflammatory cytokines: Potential role in chronic pancreatitis. Gut,2002, 50 : 535-542.
  • 2Xingpeng Wang, Bingxian Wang, Jianxin Wu. Pancreatitis-associated protein-1 mRNA expression in mouse pancreas is upregulated by lipopolysaccharide independent of cerulein-pancreatitis. J Gast Hepa,2001,16:79-87.
  • 3Bustin S A.Quantification of mRNA using real-time reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) : trends and problems. J Mole Endo, 2002, 29 : 23-39.
  • 4Chen F,Csstranova V,Shi X New insights into the role of nuclear facter-κB,aubiquitous transcription factor in the initiation of diseases.Clin Chem,1999,45:7-17.
  • 5Gross V,Andreesen R,Leser HG Interleukin-8 and neutrophil activation in acute pancreatitis.Eur J Chin Invest,1992,22:200-203.
  • 6Weber CK,Adler G.From acinar cell damage to systemic inflammatory response:current concepts in pancreatitis.Pancreatology,2001,1:356-362.
  • 7秦仁义,邹声泉,吴在德,裘法祖.丹参对胆源性胰腺炎的防治作用[J].中华实验外科杂志,2000,17(4):333-334. 被引量:31
  • 8孙备,姜洪池,许军,朴大勋,赵金朋.重症急性胰腺炎手术治疗的经验[J].中华肝胆外科杂志,2001,7(9):536-539. 被引量:44
  • 9孙备,李哈莉,许军,姜洪池.早期改善胰腺微循环对重症急性胰腺炎的影响[J].临床外科杂志,2002,10(6):337-338. 被引量:10

共引文献52

同被引文献9

  • 1Ducarme G, Maire F, Chatel P,et al. Acute pancreatitis during preg- nancy :a review[ J ]. J Perinato1,2014,34(2) :87-94.
  • 2Faria MR, Heshida MS, Ferro EAV,el al. Spatiotemporal patterns of ma,'rophage migration inhibitory faclor (Mif) expression in the mouse placenta[ J ]. Reprod Biol Endocrino1,2010,8:95.
  • 3Leng L, Melz CN, Fang Y,et al. MIF signal tran,tuction initiated by binding to CD74 [ J ]. J Exp Med ,2003,197 ( 11 ) : 1467-1476.
  • 4Sehmid/J, Rattner DW, Lewandrowski K, el al. A heller model of a- cute pancreatitis hr ewaluating therapy[ J ]. Ann Surg, 1992,215 ( 1 ) : 44-56.
  • 5Camargo CA, Madden JF,(,ao W,cl al. lntcrleukin-6 prntects liwr a- gainst warm ischemia/reperfusion injury and promotes hepatocytc pro- liferation in the rdent[ J ]. tlepatology, 1997,26( 6 ) : 1513-1520.
  • 6Eddy JJ,Gideonsen MD, Song JY, et al. Pancreatitis in pregnancy : a 10 year retrospective of 15 Midwest hospitals[ J ]. Obsletr Gynecol, 2008,112(5) :1075-1081.
  • 7He ZJ, Matikainen MP, Alho H,ct al. Extrapam.'rcatic organ impair- merit in caerulein induced pancreatitis[ J ]. Ann Chit Gynaecol, 1999, 88(2) :112-117.
  • 8letta F, Wu Y, Romagmli R, ct al. Oxygen regulation of macrophage migration inhibitory fat,!or in human plm:enta[ J]. Am J Physiol Endo- crinol Metab,2007,292( 1 ) : E272-E280.
  • 9Shi X, Leng L, Warren K, ct al. CIM4 is the signaling component ff the macrophage migration inhibitory tactor-CD74 reeeptor complex [ J ]. hnmunity ,2006,25 (4) :595-606.

引证文献1

二级引证文献3

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部