期刊文献+

角度人工颈椎间盘置换对关节突应力的影响 被引量:5

EFFECTS OF NOVEL ANGLED CERVICAL DISC REPLACEMENT ON FACET JOINT STRESS
原文传递
导出
摘要 目的探讨带角度人工颈椎间盘置换后关节突及相邻关节突应力变化。方法选择400名西北地区40岁以上人群颈椎侧位X线片,计算机辅助设计软件测量颈椎间盘角,设计10°人工颈椎间盘;对已建立的C4、C5两节段带椎间盘的正常颈椎有限元模型、C4、5置换0°椎间盘假体和置换10°椎间盘假体后的颈椎模型进行轴向加压、前屈/后伸、侧弯、扭转加载,对比观察C4、5关节突应力变化;对已建立的C4~C6三节段带椎间盘的正常颈椎有限元模型、C4、5置换0°椎间盘假体和置换10°椎间盘假体后的颈椎模型同样方式进行加载,对比置换节段及相邻节段的关节突应力变化。结果 C3~C7椎间盘角分别为:C3、4(9.97±3.64)°,C4、5(9.95±4.34)°,C5、6(8.59±3.75)°,C6、7(8.49±3.39)°,各椎间隙之间椎间盘角两两比较,C3、4与C4、5,C5、6与C6、7差异无统计学意义(P>0.05),其余各椎间隙之间差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。C4、C5两节段模型加载中,轴向加载下三者等效剪应力(Se)无明显差异;前屈/后伸时正常模型Se最大,10°假体置换组最小;侧弯时正常椎体Se最大,10°假体置换组最小;扭转时10°假体置换组更接近正常椎体生理状态力学特性。C4~C6三节段模型加载中,C4、5节段的关节突关节Se在轴向加载、前屈/后伸、侧弯时较正常椎体明显减小;扭转时减小不明显,接近正常状态。相邻下位节段C5、6关节突应力在轴向加载和侧弯时应力明显减小,扭转时应力减小较少,前屈/后伸时无明显改变,接近正常节段力学特性。结论 10°椎间盘假体植入椎间隙对颈椎相邻节段的关节突应力影响小,接近正常颈椎间盘力学性能。 Objective To analyze the biomechanical changes of the adjacent cervical facet joints when the angled cervical prosthesis is replaced.Methods A total of 400 northwestern people were involved,with an age of 40 years or older.The cervical vertebra lateral X-ray films were taken,and the cervical angles were measured by professional computer aided design software,then the cervical intervertebral disc prosthesis with 10° angle was designed.The finite element models of C4,5 and C4-6 segments with intact cervical discs were developed;the C4,5 disc was replaced by the cervical prosthesis with 0° and 10° angle respectively;and then all models were subjected to axial loading,flexion/extension,lateral bending,and torsion loading conditions;the stress effects on adjacent facet joints after replacement were observed by comparing with that of the intact model.Results The cervical angles were(9.97 ± 3.64)° in C3,4,(9.95 ± 4.34)° in C4,5,(8.59 ± 3.75)° in C5,6,and(8.49 ± 3.39)° in C6,7,showing no significant difference between C3,4 and C4,5,C5,6 and C6,7(P 0.05) and showing significant differences between the other cervical angles(P 0.05).When C4,5 model was axially loaded,no significant difference in equivalent shearing stress were observed in intact,0°,and 10° groups;at flexion/extension loading,the stress was biggest in intact group,and was smallest in 10° group;at lateral bending,the stress got the high rank in intact group,and was minimum in 10° group;at torsion loading,the stress state of 10° group approached to the intact one condition.When C4-6 model was loaded,the facet joint stress of the replaced segment(C4,5) decreased significantly at axial loading,flexion/extension,and lateral bending;while no obvious decrease was observed at torsion loading;the stress of the adjacent inferior disc(C5,6) decreased significantly at axial loading and lateral bending condition,while less decrease was observed at torsion loading,no significant change at flexion/extension condition,it approached to that of the intact one.Conclusion The finite element analysis reveals that the biomechanical properties of 10° designed prosthesis is approximate to that of the intact cervical disc,thus the 10° designed prosthesis can meet the requirements of biomechanical function reconstruction of the cervical spine.
出处 《中国修复重建外科杂志》 CAS CSCD 北大核心 2012年第4期390-395,共6页 Chinese Journal of Reparative and Reconstructive Surgery
基金 陕西省科技攻关资助项目[2007k14-01(2)]~~
关键词 颈椎 人工颈椎间盘置换 生物力学 关节突 Cervical spine Artificial vertebral disc replacement BiomechanicsFacet joint
  • 相关文献

参考文献23

  • 1Denaro V,Di Martino A.Cervical spine surgery:an historical perspec-tive.Clin Orthop Relat Res,2011,469(3):639-648.
  • 2Cepoiu-Martin M,Faris P,Lorenzetti D,et al.Artificial cervical discarthroplasty(ACDA):a systematic review.Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2011.[Epub ahead of print].
  • 3Shim CS,Lee SH,Park HJ,et al.Early clinical and radiologic outcomesof cervical arthroplasty with Bryan Cervical Disc prosthesis.J SpinalDisord Tech,2006,19(7):465-470.
  • 4Kim HK,Kim MH,Cho DS,et al.Surgical outcome of cervical arthro-plasty using bryan(r).J Korean Neurosurg Soc,2009,46(6):532-537.
  • 5Pal GP,Sherk HH.The vertieal stability of the cervieal spine.Spine(Phila Pa 1976),1988,13(5):447-449.
  • 6Yue WM,Brodner W,Highland TR.Long-term results after anteriorcervical discectomy and fusion with allograft and plating:a 5 to 11 yearradiologic and clinical follow-up study.Spine(Phila Pa 1976),2005,30(19):2138-2144.
  • 7Kowalski RJ,Ferrara LA,Benzel EC,et al.Biomechanics of the spine.Neurosurg,2005,15(1):42-59.
  • 8Hacker RJ,Miller CG.Failed anterior cervical foramianotomy.J Neu-rosurg,2003,98(2 Suppl):126-130.
  • 9van Limbeek J,Jacobs WC,Anderson PG,et al.A systematic literaturereview to identify the best method for a single level anterior cervicalinterbody fusion.Eur Spine J,2000,9(2):129-136.
  • 10Kim SW,Limson MA,Kim SB,et al.Comparison of radiographicchanges after ACDF versus Bryan disc arthroplasty in single and bi-level cases.Eur Spine J,2009,18(2):218-231.

二级参考文献18

  • 1梁秋发,原林,王文军,曹盛俊,刘利乐,朱一平,王麓山,姚女兆,全必春.人工颈椎间盘置换术后颈椎活动与稳定性的评价[J].中国临床解剖学杂志,2005,23(6):664-667. 被引量:6
  • 2Goffin J,Calenbergh FV,Loon JV,et al.Intermediate follow-up after treatment of degenerative disc disease with the Bryan cervical disc prosthesis:single-level and bi-level [J].Spine, 2003,28 (24) :2673-2678.
  • 3Dvorak J,Froehlieh D,Penning L,et al.Funetional radiographic diagnosis of the cervical spine:flexion/ extension[J].Spine, 1988,13(7) :748-755.
  • 4Gore DR,Sepic SB,Gardner GM. Roentgenographic findings of the cervical spine in asymptomatic people[J].Spine,1986,11 (6) :521-524.
  • 5McAfee PC,Cunningham BW,Devine JG,et al.Classification of heterotopic ossification(HO) in artificial disk replacement[J].J Spinal Disord Tech,2003,16(4) :384-389.
  • 6Pfirrmann CW,Metzdorf A,Zanetti M, et al. Magnetic resonance classification of lumbar intervertebral disc degeneration [J].Spine, 2001,26 (17) : 1873-1878.
  • 7Odom GL,Finney W. Cervical disc lesions[J].JAMA,1958,166 ( 1 ) : 23-28.
  • 8Hukuda S,Mochizuki T,Ogata M,et al. Operations for cervical spondylotic myelopathy:a comparison of the results of anterior and posterior proeedures[J].J Bone Joint Surg Br,1985,67(4): 609-615.
  • 9Katz J, Melzack R. Measurement of pain[J]. Surg Clin North Am, 1999,79(2) :231-252.
  • 10Anderson P,Rouleau J.Intervertebral disc arthroplasty[J].Spine, 2004,29 (23) : :2779-2786.

共引文献19

同被引文献80

  • 1舒小秋,万磊,尹东,虞春堂,靳安民.新型形态记忆合金颈椎夹钩的计算机仿真研究[J].南方医科大学学报,2006,26(8):1197-1199. 被引量:7
  • 2Liu F, Cheng J, Komistek RD,等.正常颈椎、前路颈椎融合内固定术后和颈椎人工椎间盘置换术后颈椎运动特性的评价[J].脊柱,2007,32(23),pp2578-2584.
  • 3Ajay J, David AC, Eubulus JK, 等.颈椎人工椎间盘置换未能影响相邻节段退变发生率:三处前瞻性的随机临床试验共93例报告[J].脊柱杂志,2010,10(12):1043-1048.
  • 4Murrey D, Janssen M, Delamarter R,等.食品和药物管理局主持的ProDisc-C颈椎人工椎问盘置换术与前路颈椎融合固定术对单节段颈椎病治疗效果的前瞻性、随机对照的多中心研究结果[J].脊柱杂志,2009,9(4):275-286.
  • 5Galbusera F,Bellini CM,Raimondi MT,等.颈椎椎问盘假体植入后的生物力学[J].医学工程与物理学,2008,30(9):1127-1133.
  • 6Li Xin-Feng, Dai Li-Yang. 颈椎脊髓的三维有限元模型:损伤机制的初步分析结果[J].脊柱,2009,34(11):pp1140-1147.
  • 7Yoganandan N, Kumaresan SC, Pintar FA.颈椎生物力学2:颈椎软组织的力学反应及生物力学模型[J].临床生物力学,2001,16:1-27.
  • 8Yoganandan N, Kumaresan SC, Pintar FA .人体颈椎韧带的几何图形及力学性质[J].生物医学工程学杂志,2000,122(6):623-629.
  • 9Rousseau MA, Bonnet X, Skalli, W.球窝结构的颈椎椎间假体的几何形状的影响:一项有限元实验[J].脊柱,2008,33(1):ppE10-E14.
  • 10Galbusera F, Fantigrossi A, Raimondi MT,等.颈5-6椎间盘髓核假体置换前后的生物力学[J].生物力学和机械生物学模型,2006,5(4):253-261.

引证文献5

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部