2Thomas Sterner&Lena Hoglund Isaksson.2006.Refunded emission payments theory,distribution of costs,and Swedish experience of Nox abatement.ecological economics 57(2006),.
3Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.2000.The Swedish charge on nitrogen oxides-cost effective emission reduction.information facts.
4Swedish Environmental Protection Agency.2007.economic instruments in environmental policy.summary of a government assignment report.
5Swedish environmental protection agency.2008.database of information from annual surveys of plants regulated by the Swedish Nox charge.data used by kind permission of the Swedish Environmental Protecton Agency.
6Buchanan J. M. The Economics of Earmarked Taxes [J]. Journal of Political Economy, 1963.
7Xavier Delache. Implementing ecotaxes in France: some issues, Environmental Taxes & Charges: National Experiences & Plans [R]. Dublin, 1996.
8Craig Brett and Michael Keen. Political uncertainty and the earmarking of environmental taxes [ J]. Journal of Public Economics, Volum 75, March 2000.
10Smets Henri. COSCA: a complementary system for compensation of accidental pollution damage [ A ]. in Westterstein Peter ed. Harm to the Environment : The Right to Compensation and the Assessment of Damages [ C ]. New York: Oxford University Press Inc. , 1997.
