期刊文献+

英语构式形成与识解的转喻动因 被引量:6

Metonymy as a Motivation Behind English Construction Formation and Interpretation
原文传递
导出
摘要 本文对英语中三个常见构式——表极性程度的动结构式、TIME-away构式和Way构式进行了分析。研究发现:作为认知能力之一的概念转喻,以不同的形态作用于语言结构,是语言中现存的一些构式的必要识解机制,是它们形成的动因之一,并为一些构式间的继承关系提供了解释。构式作为形义匹配的语言单位,是语言系统与认知能力在一定社会文化情境下互动的产物。 By analyzing three common constructions in English—sultative Construction denoting intensity,TIME-away Construction and Way Construction,this study discovers that metonymy,as a strong motivation behind their formations,works on different language structures with different configurations of metonymic chains,serving as a necessary cognitive mechanism in the interpretations of some constructions and offering an explanation for inheritance links as inter-construction relations.As pairings of form and meaning,constructions are products of interactions between language system and human's cognition under certain social and cultural context.
作者 赵琪
出处 《外语与外语教学》 CSSCI 北大核心 2012年第2期7-11,共5页 Foreign Languages and Their Teaching
基金 上海市哲学社会科学规划课题青年项目"英汉构式生成与识解的转喻动因研究"(项目编号:2010EYY004)的阶段性成果
关键词 转喻动因 极性程度动结式 继承连接 metonymic motivation resultative construction denoting intensity inheritance links
  • 相关文献

参考文献1

二级参考文献17

  • 1刘乃实.关联理论视角中的幽默乖讹与消解[J].解放军外国语学院学报,2005,28(1):16-19. 被引量:47
  • 2Attardo,S.,C.Hempelmann & S.Di Maio.Script Oppositions and Logical Mechanisms:Modeling Incongruities and Their Resolutions[J].Humor,2002,15 (1):3-46.
  • 3Bergen,B.& K.Binsted.The Cognitive Linguistics of Scalar Humor[C] // M.Achard and S.Kemmer.Language,Culture,and Mind.Stanford:CSLI Publications,2003:1-14.
  • 4Bergen,B.& K.Binsted.Embodied Grammar and Humor[Z/OL].(2004-03-19)[2006-12-21].http://www2.hawaii.edu/~ bergen/papers/CogLingHumorBergenBinsted.pdf.
  • 5Br(o)ne,G.& K.Feyaerts.The Cognitive Linguistics of Incongruity Resolution:Marked Reference-point Structures in Humor[C/OL].(2003 -06 -30)[2006-12 -21].http://wwwling.arts.kuleuven.ac.be/iclc/Papers/BroneFeyaerts.pdf.
  • 6Coulson,S.Semantic Leaps:Frame-shifting and Conceptual Blending in Meaning Construction[M].Cambridge:Cambridge University Press,2001:49.
  • 7Giora,R.Understanding Figurative and Literal Language:The Graded Salience Hypothesis[J].Cognitive Linguistics,1997,7:183-206.
  • 8Lakoff,G.& M.Johnson.Philosophy in the Flesh[M].New York:Basic Books,1999.
  • 9Langacker,R.W.Referencepoint Constructions[J].Cognitive Linguistics,1993,4 (1):1-38.
  • 10Radden,G & Z.K(o)vecses.Towards a Theory of Metonymy[C] // Klaus-Uwe Panther & G.Radden.Metonymy in Language and Thought.Amsterdam and Philadelphia:John Benjamins Publishing Company,1999.

共引文献10

同被引文献74

引证文献6

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部