期刊文献+

氨磷汀联合化疗治疗Ewing肉瘤/PNET的临床观察 被引量:2

Efficacy of amifostine combined with chemotherapy for patients with Ewing sarcoma or PNET
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的探讨氨磷汀联合化疗治疗Ewing肉瘤/PNET的疗效、不良反应和安全性。方法 32例Ewing肉瘤/PNET患者分为化疗加氨磷汀组(观察组)及单纯化疗组(对照组),观察组12例,对照组20例。行IFO-IFO-DDP-ADM化疗2周期后评价疗效、不良反应。结果观察组完全缓解(CR)及非常好的部分缓解率(VGPR)为91.6%,对照组为90.0%,两组比较差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。比较两组各种Ⅰ度~Ⅳ度不良反应发生率,差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。比较两组发生的Ⅳ度不良反应,观察组Ⅳ度白细胞减少为25.0%,对照组为70.0%;观察组Ⅳ度粒细胞减少25.0%,对照组为75.0%,差异均有统计学意义(P<0.05)。结论氨磷汀联合化疗治疗Ewing肉瘤/PNET不改变化疗疗效,不增加各种常见不良反应发生率;可以明显减少化疗后Ⅳ度白细胞及粒细胞减少的发生率,安全性好。 Objective To investigate the efficacy and adverse reactions of chemotherapy combined with amifostine for patients with Ewing sarcoma or primary neuroectodermal tumor(PNET).Methods Thirty-two patients with Ewing sarcoma/PNET were divided into Group A(amifostine group,n=12) and Group B(control group,n=20).After two cycles of IFO-IFO-DDP-ADM chemotherapy,the efficacy and adverse reaction of chemotherapy were observed.Results The rate of complete remission(CR) and very good partial response(VGPR) was 91.6% in Group A,and 90.0% in Group B(P 0.05).There was no significant difference in rate of adverse reaction Ⅰ~Ⅳ between two groups(P 0.05).The rate of Ⅳ leukopenia in Group A was 25.0% and 70.0% in Group B(P0.05).The rate of Ⅳ neutropenia in Group A was 25.0% and 75.0% in Group B(P0.05).Conclusion Amifostine combined with chemotherapy for patients with Ewing sarcoma/PNET may not change the efficacy or adverse reaction,while the rate of Ⅳ leukopenia and neutropenia would be reduced.
出处 《实用肿瘤杂志》 CAS 2012年第2期188-191,共4页 Journal of Practical Oncology
基金 杭州市卫生局项目(2008B0037)
关键词 肉瘤 Ewing/药物疗法 氨磷汀/治疗应用 氨磷汀/副作用 抗肿瘤联合化疗方案/治疗应用 神经外胚瘤 原始/药物疗法 治疗结果 amifostine/therapeutic use amifostine/adverse effects antineoplastic combined chemotherapy protocols/therapeutic use neuroectodermal tumors primitive/drug therapy sarcoma Ewing′s/drug therapy treatment outcome
  • 相关文献

参考文献13

二级参考文献66

共引文献92

同被引文献15

  • 1郭卫,汤小东,唐顺,杨毅.三氧化二砷联合化疗治疗Ⅲ期成骨肉瘤、尤文肉瘤的初步报告[J].中华外科杂志,2006,44(12):805-808. 被引量:26
  • 2Anninga JK, Gelderblom H, Fiocco M, et al Chemotherapeutic adjuvant treatment for osteosarcoma where do we stand [ J] ? Eur J Cancer, 2011,47 ( 16 ) 2431 - 2445.
  • 3Kager L, Zoubek A, Potschger U, et al. Primary metastatic osteosarcoma : presentation and outcome of patients treated on neoadjuvant Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group protocols [J]. J Clin Oncol,2003,21 ( 10 ) : 2011 - 2018.
  • 4Hatting MT,Blakely ML,Jaffe N,et al. Long-term survival after aggressive resection of pulmonary metastases among children and adolescents with osteosarcoma [ J ]. J Pediatr Surg,2006,41 ( 1 ) : 194 - 199.
  • 5Ozger H, Eralp L, Atalar AC, et al. Survival analysis and the effects of prognostic factors in patients treated for osteosarcoma[ J]. Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc, 2007,41 (3) :211 -219.
  • 6Ferrari S, Bertoni F, Mercuri M, et al. Predictive factors of disease-free survival for non-metastatic osteosarcoma of the extremity: an analysis of 300 patients treated at the Rizzoli Institute [ J ]. Ann Oncol, 2001,12 ( 8 ) : 1145 - 1150.
  • 7Bramer JA, Abudu AA,Tillman RM, et al. Pre- and post- chemotherapy alkaline phosphatase levels as prognostic indicators in adults with localised osteosarcoma[ J]. Eur J Cancer,2005,41 (18) :2846 -2852.
  • 8胡永成.第二届全国骨肉瘤新辅助化疗专家研讨会会议纪要[J].中华骨科杂志,2008,28(10):870-874. 被引量:8
  • 9牛晓辉,丁易.合并病理骨折骨肉瘤的治疗[J].中华外科杂志,2008,46(22):1730-1733. 被引量:4
  • 10王翌庆,丁克峰.大剂量甲氨蝶呤多药联合治疗骨肉瘤不良反应的处理和分析[J].实用肿瘤杂志,2009,24(4):407-410. 被引量:5

引证文献2

二级引证文献8

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部