期刊文献+

血清肿瘤标志物检测在肺癌中的临床价值 被引量:16

The Clinical Value of Serum Tumor Markers in Lung Cancer
下载PDF
导出
摘要 目的研究肺癌患者血清癌胚抗原(carcinoembryonic antigen,CEA)、神经元特异性烯醇化酶(neuron-spe-cific enolase,NSE)、细胞角蛋白19片段(cytokeratin 19 fragments,CYFRA21-1)水平与肺癌分期、近期疗效的关系。方法5例确诊为肺癌的患者均完成4个周期化疗,化疗前后常规检查血清CEA、NSE、CYFRA21-1,评估其变化。结果 5例患者中血清肿瘤标志物表达阳性者占61.8%,其中小细胞肺癌(SCLC)为69.2%,非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)为59.5%;血清CEA、NSE、CYFRA21-1表达阳性率:SCLC分别为30.8%、69.2%及7.7%;NSCLC分别为52.4%、14.3%及54.8%。CEA、NSE、CYFRA21-1表达阳性率SCLC广泛期高于局限期,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05);NSCLCⅢB期与Ⅳ期各组间比较,差异有统计学意义(P<0.05)。化疗后血清肿瘤标志物表达水平变化与近期疗效相关。结论血清肿瘤标志物CEA、NSE及CYFRA21-1与肺癌分期、近期疗效有关。肺癌晚期肿瘤标志物表达水平增高,化疗有效率明显下降。 Objective To study the relationship between the level of serum CEA,NSE and CYFRA21-1 and the stage and short-term curative effect of lung cancer.Methods 55 lung cancer patients completed four cycles of chemotherapy were included in the study.The serum CEA,NSE and CYFRA21-1 were routinely detected before and after chemotherapy.Results Serum tumor markers were positive in 61.8% of the 55 patients.The positive rate was 69.2%(9/13) in small cell lung cancer(SCLC) and 59.5% in non-small cell lung cancer(NSCLC).In SCLC and NSCLC,the serum CEA,NSE and CYFRA21-1 expression rate were 30.8%(4/13) and 52.4%(22/42);69.2%(9/13) and 14.3%(6/42);7.7%(1/13) and 54.8%(23/42),respectively.The positive rate of the tumor markers was significantly higher in SCLC with extensive stage disease than in patients with limited stage disease.In NSCLC,patients with ⅢB disease had significantly higher levels of tumors than patients with stage Ⅳ disease.After chemotherapy,the expression level of serum tumor markers changed.And the changes were related to short-term curative effect.Conclusion Serum tumor markers CEA,NSE and CYFRA21-1 are related to lung cancer stage and the short-term curative effect.
出处 《实用癌症杂志》 2012年第2期141-143,共3页 The Practical Journal of Cancer
关键词 肺肿瘤 肿瘤标记 癌胚抗原 神经元特异性烯醇化酶 细胞角蛋白19片段 Lung cancer Tumor marker Carcinoembryonic antigen(CEA) Neuron-specific enolase(NSE) Cytokeratin 19 fragments(CYFRA21-1)
  • 相关文献

参考文献5

二级参考文献56

  • 1刘晓玲,汪涛,王雯,姜缨,郑伟.SCC-Ag、CEA在肺癌患者血清中的表达及临床意义[J].西安交通大学学报(医学版),2004,25(5):468-469. 被引量:7
  • 2罗素霞,马保根,陈小兵,肖毅军.LTA、CYFRA21-1、NSE和CEA联合检测对肺癌诊断及病理分型的价值[J].郑州大学学报(医学版),2005,40(6):1125-1127. 被引量:7
  • 3马建辉.重视实体瘤疗效评价标准的变革——RECIST概要[J].中华泌尿外科杂志,2006,27(2):77-79. 被引量:39
  • 4Karnofsky DA. Meaningful clinical classification of therapeutic responses to anticancer drugs [ J]. Clin Pharmacol Ther, 1961,2: 709-712.
  • 5Miller AB, Hoogstraten B, Staquet M, et al. Reporting results of cancer treatment[ J ]. Cancer, 1981,47 ( 1 ) :207-214.
  • 6Therasse P, Arbuck SG, Eisenhauer EA,et al. New guidelines to evaluate the response to treatment in solid tumors[ J]. J Natl Cancer Inst,2000,92(3) :179-181.
  • 7Mazumdar M, Smith A, Schwartz LH. A statistical simulation study finds discordance between WHO criteria and RECIST guideline [ J]. J Clin Epidemio1,2004,57 (4) :358-365.
  • 8van Klaveren RJ, Aerts JG, de Bruin H, et al. Inadequacy of the RECIST criteria for response evaluation in patients with malignant pleural mesothelioma[ J ]. Lung Cancer,2004,43 ( 1 ) :63-69.
  • 9Tropine A, Dellani PD, Glaser M ,et al. Differentiation of fibroblastic meningiomas from other benign subtypes using diffusion tensor imaging[J]. J Magn Reson Imaging,2007,25(4) :703-708.
  • 10Choi H, Charnsangavej C, de Castro-Faria S,et al. CT evaluation of the response of gastrointestinal stromal tumors after imatinib mesylate treatment: A quantitative analysis correlated with FDG PET findings [ J ]. A JR Am J Roentgenol,2004,183 (6) : 1619-1628.

共引文献69

同被引文献119

引证文献16

二级引证文献92

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部