摘要
逻辑作为一门科学 ,一向被认为是全人类的、普遍的 ,并且是唯一的。本文通过对语言影响思维、逻辑推理 ,进而影响逻辑学的论证 ,提出了不同民族因语言不同 ,因而产生和发展、引申的逻辑也不尽相同 ,墨子不是亚里士多德 ,中国古代的逻辑理论与思想也不是西方传统的形式逻辑。所以 ,受语言等因素影响的在不同民族中独立引申、发展起来的逻辑也必然具有其个性。
Being a science,logic was ever regarded as universal, and unique. By demonstrating that languages influent the thinking、logic reasoning, and logic, this artical advances a new suggestion: different nations emerge and develop idfferent logics because of different languages.Mozi was not Aristotel.Chinese acient theories and thoughts of logic was not western traditional formal logic. So, because of language's influenting,logics must have their different specific characters in different nations.
出处
《徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》
2000年第1期73-77,共5页
Journal of Xuzhou Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)