期刊文献+

慧超《往五天竺国传》笺释拾遗

An Omission of Notes and Commentaries of the Hui chao's Diary: Memoir of the pilgrimage to the Five Regions of India
下载PDF
导出
摘要 《往五天竺国传》的作者确为新罗人慧超 ,慧超传中“当土是胡 ,所以信也”一语表明 :慧超已明确指出大勃律国、杨同国、娑播慈国人的衣着言音人风信仰与吐蕃不同 ,因为他们是胡人 ,三国在人种上可能同于印度或中亚的胡人 ,即可能是来自大夏的大月氏人的后裔 ;慧超更有可能在大食境内旅行过 ,这与当时中亚的政治形势有关。本文对大食国小拂临国条中的一句笺释提出了自己的看法。 The author of memoir of the pilgrimage to the five regions of India is really Huichao who was an ancient Korean. A sentence of 'the natives are people, so they believe in Buddha' in the Huichao's diary makes clear: Huichao has exactly pointed out that those of the Great Pulu, Yang Tong and Shapoz differed from Tibetan in clothing, language and custom, because they are Hu people, the three states are similar in race to Hu people in India or central Asia, that is to say, possibly descendants who originated from the Great Yueh Chin in Bactria. He has probably traveled in the territory of the caliphate, It's concern of political situation of central Asia. This paper also makes comment on a note of the Little Fulin and Tajik in the Memoir.
作者 张文德
出处 《徐州师范大学学报(哲学社会科学版)》 2000年第1期118-121,共4页 Journal of Xuzhou Normal University(Philosophy and Social Sciences Edition)
基金 韩国由泉奖学文化财团提供资助
关键词 佛教 传记 慧超 往五天竺国传 胡人 大食国 Huichao Memoir of the pilgrimage to the five regions of India Hu people Tajik(the Caliphate)
  • 相关文献

相关作者

内容加载中请稍等...

相关机构

内容加载中请稍等...

相关主题

内容加载中请稍等...

浏览历史

内容加载中请稍等...
;
使用帮助 返回顶部