摘要
本文侧重考察"好了"和"行了"在言谈交际中所表达的话语功能,通过对二者所表达的相近话语功能,即话题结束、话题开启和情态表达功能的对比分析发现,"好了"和"行了"在具体使用时,言者的语气语调、话语标记的位置、言谈双方的角色地位等存在一定差异。这些差异源于言者的交互主观性,即"好了"基于平等关系,"行了"则基于非平等关系。
Based on nalysis, investigated authentic oral data,this paper,by employing the theories of discourse athe discourse functions of discourse markers "haole" and "xingle". We found that the two markers shared great similarities in the functions of topic-ending, discourse-opening and empathy features. But they couldn't be replaced by each other. With both qualitative and quantitative methods,this paper compared the two markers with each other. And then we found that the two markers differ in the speakers' intersubjectivity. This conclusion stems from careful observation of the context.
出处
《汉语学习》
CSSCI
北大核心
2012年第2期54-61,共8页
Chinese Language Learning
基金
安徽省高校优秀青年人才基金项目"江淮官话洪巢片句式研究"(项目编号:2012SQRW014)
安徽大学省高校博士后岗位资助项目"汉语话语标记功能及相关理论研究"
安徽大学博士科研启动经费项目"现代汉语‘X了’类话语标记功能研究"(项目编号:33190069)的部分研究成果
关键词
话语标记
好了
行了
话语功能
交互主观性
Key words: discourse markers
"hao/e" ( ~ T )
"xingle" ( ~ T )
discourse function
in-tersubjectivity ~ 61 ~