摘要
目的探讨早产儿配方奶及水解蛋白奶在住院早产低出生体重儿喂养过程中,在胃肠保护作用方面有无差异,以期进一步有效指导入院低体重儿乳制品的合理选择。方法收集新生儿科NICU 2008年2月-2010年8月收治的早产低出生体重儿156例,采用回顾性调查分析方法,通过翻阅病历收集新生儿的性别、孕周、出生体重、开奶日龄、持续喂养天数以及所患疾病。按照喂养开奶类型不同分为水解蛋白奶喂养组(A组,111例)和早产儿配方奶喂养组(B组,45例)。结果两组患儿性别、开奶日龄、持续喂养天数、胎龄、疾病分布上均无统计学差异(P>0.05),A组和B组的胃肠功能障碍各临床特点发生概率无统计学差异。结论在住院生命体征相对稳定的早产低出生体重儿,无论是早产儿配方奶喂养还是水解蛋白奶喂养,其患儿的喂养不耐受发生情况无统计学差异。
Objective To investigate the difference between hydrolyzed protein milk and formula milk fed to preterm low-birth-weight neonatal in the protection of stomach and intestine, so that better diary product can be chosen for hospitalized low-birth-weight baby. Methods We retrospectively analyzed the basic information of 156 low–birth-weight babies treated in our hospital from February 2008 to August 2010. Data like gender of the baby, gestational age, birth weight, age of first milk feeding, days of continuous feeding, and diseases were collected. Based on different milk, we divided the babies into two groups: the hydrolyzed protein milk group (group A, n=111) and the formula milk group (group B, n=45). Results There was no significant difference in gender, gestational age, the age of first milk feeding, days of continuous feeding and disease type between the two groups (P 〉 0.05). and there was also no significant difference in the characteristics of gastrointestinal disorders between the two groups. Conclusion For preterm low-birth-weight neonatal, there is no significant difference in the incidence of feeding intolerance between formula milk and hydrolyzed protein milk feeding.
出处
《华西医学》
CAS
2012年第3期368-371,共4页
West China Medical Journal
关键词
早产低体重儿
胃肠不耐受
喂养
Low-birth-weight neonatal
Feeding intolerance
Feeding